ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Abstract specification of legal contracts
Full text PdfPdf (281 KB)
Source International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law archive
Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law table of contents
Barcelona, Spain
SESSION: Research abstracts table of contents
Pages 218-219  
Year of Publication: 2009
ISBN:978-1-60558-597-0
Authors
Cristian Prisacariu  University of Oslo, Blindern, Oslo, Norway
Gerardo Schneider  University of Oslo, Blindern, Oslo, Norway
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 11,   Downloads (12 Months): 22,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1568234.1568262
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

The paper presents an action-based formal language called CL for abstract specification of legal contracts. The purpose of the language is to be used to reason about legal contracts (and electronic contracts on the long run). CL combines the legal notions obligation, permission, and prohibition from deontic logic with the action modality of propositional dynamic logic (PDL). The deontic modalities are applied only over actions, thus following the ought-to-do approach. The language includes a synchrony operator to model "actions performed at the same time", and a special complementation operation to encode the violation of obligations. The language has a formal semantics in terms of normative structures, specially defined to capture several natural properties of legal contracts. We focus on the informal presentation of the choices made when designing CL, and its semantics.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
J. Carmo and A. Jones. Deontic logic and contrary-to-duties. In Handbook of Philosophical Logic, pages 265--343. Kluwer, 2002.
 
3
P. F. Castro and T. Maibaum. A complete and compact propositional deontic logic. In ICTAC'07, volume 4711 of LNCS, pages 109--123, 2007.
 
4
J.-J. C. Meyer. A different approach to deontic logic: Deontic logic viewed as a variant of dynamic logic. Notre Dame J. Formal Logic, 29(1): 109--136, 1988.
 
5
R. Milner. Calculi for synchrony and asynchrony. Theorethical Computer Science, 25: 267--310, 1983.
 
6
 
7
R. Van der Meyden. Dynamic logic of permission, the. In LICS'90, pages 72--78. IEEE, 1990.
 
8
G. H. Von Wright. An Essay in Deontic Logic and the General Theory of Action. North Holland, 1968.

Collaborative Colleagues:
Cristian Prisacariu: colleagues
Gerardo Schneider: colleagues