A proposal for evidential reasoning about motives

Subscribe (Full Service)


	Search: The ACM Digital Library The Guide

	Feedback

A proposal for evidential reasoning about motives

Full text

Pdf (243 KB)

Source

International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law archive
Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law table of contents

Barcelona, Spain

SESSION: Research abstracts table of contents

Pages 212-213

Year of Publication: 2009

ISBN:978-1-60558-597-0

Authors

Floris Bex	University of Groningen, The Netherlands
Katie Atkinson	University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK

Publisher

ACM New York, NY, USA

Bibliometrics

Downloads (6 Weeks): 6, Downloads (12 Months): 13, Citation Count: 0

Additional Information:

abstract references index terms collaborative colleagues

Tools and Actions:	Request Permissions Review this Article Save this Article to a Binder Display Formats: BibTeX EndNote ACM Ref

DOI Bookmark:	Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1568234.1568259 What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Motives play an important role at every stage of a criminal investigation. In this research abstract we provide an overview of an account of motivations based on a general approach to practical reasoning.

REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

	1	Katie Atkinson , Trevor Bench-Capon, Practical reasoning as presumptive argumentation using action based alternating transition systems, Artificial Intelligence, v.171 n.10-15, p.855-874, July, 2007 [doi>10.1016/j.artint.2007.04.009]
	2	T. J. M. Bench-Capon. Persuasion in practical argument using value based argumentation frameworks. J. of Logic and Computation, 13(3): 429--48, 2003.
	3	F. J. Bex, T. J. M. Bench-Capon, and K. Atkinson. Did he jump or was he pushed? Abductive practical reasoning. Accepted for publication in Artificial Intelligence and Law, 2009. Available online.
	4	F. J. Bex, T. J. M. Bench-Capon, and K. Atkinson. Evidential reasoning about motives: A case study. Technical Report ULCS-09-013, Dept of Computer Science, University of Liverpool, UK, 2009.
	5	F. J. Bex , H. Prakken , B. Verheij, Formalising argumentative story-based analysis of evidence, Proceedings of the 11th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law, June 04-08, 2007, Stanford, California [doi>10.1145/1276318.1276320]
	6	D. Dennett. Intentional systems. In Brainstorms, pages 3--22. Harvester Press, 1979.
	7	P. Thagard. Causal inference in legal decision making: Explanatory coherence vs. bayesian networks. Applied Artificial Intelligence, 18: 231--241, 2004.
	8	D. Walton and B. Schafer. Arthur, George and the mystery of the missing motive: Towards a theory of evidentiary reasoning about motives. International Commentary on Evidence, 4(2): 1--47, 2006.
	9	M. Wooldridge and W. van der Hoek. On obligations and normative ability: Towards a logical analysis of the social contract. J. of Applied Logic, 3: 396--420, 2005.