ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Time series analysis of open-source software projects
Full text PdfPdf (505 KB)
Source ACM Southeast Regional Conference archive
Proceedings of the 47th Annual Southeast Regional Conference table of contents
Clemson, South Carolina
SESSION: Software engineering III table of contents
Article No. 64  
Year of Publication: 2009
ISBN:978-1-60558-421-8
Authors
Liguo Yu  Indiana Univ. South Bend, South Bend, IN
S. Ramaswamy  Univ. of Arkansas at Little Rock, Little Rock, AR
R. B. Lenin  Univ. of Arkansas at Little Rock, Little Rock, AR
V. L. Narasimhan  East Carolina Univ., Greenville, NC
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 11,   Downloads (12 Months): 23,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1566445.1566531
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Open-source software projects are characterized by their loose management property. Most of the activities of their developers are voluntary instead of mandatory. Compared to closed-source software projects, open-source projects are less dependent on external turbulence, but more on its own structure and operation mechanism. In this paper, we assume that the activities of open-source software projects are only dependent on time. We use time series analysis techniques to study the time dependence of open-source software activities. The activities of open-source Software projects are extracted from mailing lists, bug reports, and revision history. Three mailing list (Linux, FreeBSD, and Apache HTTP), two bug archives (Eclipse and Apache Software Foundation), and one revision history (Apache Software Foundation) are mined. Various time series analysis techniques are used. We find that some activities of some open-source projects are cyclic and seasonally dependent, some are cyclic but seasonally independent, and some are acyclic. We build regression models for cyclic activities and analyzed their model accuracy.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
 
3
 
4
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/, 2008.
 
5
6
 
7
Bug reports for Eclipse projects. Internet: https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/, 2008.
 
8
R. B. Cleveland, W. S. Cleveland, J. E. McRae, and I. Terpenning. Stl: A seasonal-trend decomposition procedure based on loess. Journal of Official Statistics, 6:3--73, 1990.
 
9
W. S. Clevland. Robust locally weighted regression and smoothing scatterplots. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74:829--836, 1979.
 
10
J. D. Hamilton. Time Series Analysis. Princenton University Press, 1994.
 
11
E. L. Lehman. Nonparametrics: Statistical Methods Based on Ranks. Pearson Education, 1998.
 
12
R. B. Lenin, S. Ramaswamy, Liguo Yu, and R. B. Govindan. Open-Source Software Systems: Understanding Bug Prediction Software Developer Roles, chapter 22. Handbook of Software Engineering Research and Productivity Technologies: Implications of Globalisation. IGI Global, 2009.
13
 
14
 
15

Collaborative Colleagues:
Liguo Yu: colleagues
S. Ramaswamy: colleagues
R. B. Lenin: colleagues
V. L. Narasimhan: colleagues