ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
The price of uncertainty
Full text PdfPdf (452 KB)
Source
Electronic Commerce archive
Proceedings of the tenth ACM conference on Electronic commerce table of contents
Stanford, California, USA
SESSION: Session 9 table of contents
Pages 285-294  
Year of Publication: 2009
ISBN:978-1-60558-458-4
Authors
Maria-Florina Balcan  Microsoft Research, Cambridge, MA, USA
Avrim Blum  Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
Yishay Mansour  Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGEcom: ACM Special Interest Group on Electronic Commerce
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 24,   Downloads (12 Months): 116,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1566374.1566416
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

We study the degree to which small fluctuations in costs in well-studied potential games can impact the result of natural best-response and improved-response dynamics. We call this the Price of Uncertainty and study it in a wide variety of potential games (including fair cost-sharing games, set-cover games, routing games, and job-scheduling games), finding a number of surprising results. In particular, we show that in certain cases, even extremely small fluctuations can cause these dynamics to spin out of control and move to states of much higher social cost, whereas in other cases these dynamics are much more stable even to large degrees of fluctuation.

We also consider the resilience of these dynamics to a small number of Byzantine players about which no assumptions are made. We show again a contrast between different games. In certain cases (e.g., fair cost-sharing, set-covering, job-scheduling) even a single Byzantine player can cause best-response dynamics to transition to states of substantially higher cost, whereas in others (e.g., the class of beta-nice games which includes routing, market-sharing and many others) these dynamics are much more resilient.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
3
4
 
5
M.-F. Balcan, A. Blum, and Y. Mansour. The price of uncertainty (full version). http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~ninamf/papers/pou-full.pdf.
 
6
 
7
G. Christodoulou, V.S. Mirrokni, and A. Sidiropoulos. Convergence and approximation in potential games. In Proc. 23rd STACS, 2006.
 
8
 
9
B. de Finetti. La prevision: Ses lois logiques, ses sources subjectives. Annales de l'Institut Henri Poincare, 7:1--68, 1937.
10
 
11
M.X. Goemans, L. Li, V.S. Mirrokni, and M. Thottan. Market sharing games applied to content distribution in ad-hoc networks. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communication, 24:1020--1033, 2006.
12
 
13
E. Koutsoupias and C.H. Papadimitriou. Worst-case equilibria. In Proc. 16th STACS, pages 404--413, 1999.
 
14
D. Monderer and L.S. Shapley. Potential games. Games and Economic Behavior, 14:124--143, 1996.
15
 
16
 
17
R.W. Rosenthal. A class of games possessing pure-strategy nash equilibria. Int. Journal Game Theory, 2(1), 1973.
 
18
 
19
L.J. Savage. The Foundations of Statistics. John Wiley and Sons, 1954.
 
20
A. Schrijver. Combinatorial Optimization: Polyhedra and Efficiency. Springer, 2002.
 
21
A. Tversky and D. Kahneman. The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211:453--458, 1981.
 
22
 
23
J. von Neumann and O. Morgenstern. Theory of Games and Economic Behavior. Princeton University Press, 1944.

Collaborative Colleagues:
Maria-Florina Balcan: colleagues
Avrim Blum: colleagues
Yishay Mansour: colleagues