ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Digital Library logoTake a look at the new version of this page: [ beta version ]. Tell us what you think.
Limited and online supply and the bayesian foundations of prior-free mechanism design
Full text PdfPdf (689 KB)
Source
Electronic Commerce archive
Proceedings of the tenth ACM conference on Electronic commerce table of contents
Stanford, California, USA
SESSION: Session 2 table of contents
Pages: 41-50  
Year of Publication: 2009
ISBN:978-1-60558-458-4
Authors
Nikhil R. Devanur  Microsoft Research, Redmond, WA, USA
Jason D. Hartline  Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGEcom: ACM Special Interest Group on Electronic Commerce
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 6,   Downloads (12 Months): 49,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1566374.1566381
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

We study auctions for selling a limited supply of a single commodity in the case where the supply is known in advance and the case it is unknown and must be instead allocated in an online fashion. The latter variant was proposed by Mahdian and Saberi [12] as a model of an important phenomena in auctions for selling Internet advertising: advertising impressions must be allocated as they arrive and the total quantity available is unknown in advance. We describe the Bayesian optimal mechanism for these variants and extend the random sampling auction of Goldberg et al. [8] to address the prior-free case.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
 
2
M. Babaioff, L. Blumrosen, and A. Roth. Auctions with online supply. Working paper.
 
3
S. Baliga and R. Vohra. Market research and market design. Advances in Theoretical Economics, 3, 2003.
 
4
S. Chakraborty and N. Devanur. An Online Multi-unit Auction with Improved Competitive Ratio. ArXiv e-prints, January 2009.
 
5
U. Feige, A. Flaxman, J. Hartline, and R. Kleinberg. On the Competitive Ratio of the Random Sampling Auction. In Proc. 1st Workshop on Internet and Network Economics, pages 878--886, 2005.
6
 
7
A.V. Goldberg, J.D. Hartline, A. Karlin, M. Saks, and A. Wright. Competitive auctions. Games and Economic Behavior, 55:242--269, 2006.
 
8
 
9
J. Hartline and A. Karlin. Profit maximization in mechanism design. In N. Nisan, T. Roughgarden, É. Tardos, and V. Vazirani, editors, Algorithmic Game Theory, chapter 13, pages 331--362. Cambridge University Press, 2007.
10
11
12
 
13
R. Myerson. Optimal auction design. Mathematics of Operations Research, 6:58--73, 1981.

Collaborative Colleagues:
Nikhil R. Devanur: colleagues
Jason D. Hartline: colleagues