| DataLens: making a good first impression |
| Full text |
Pdf
(458 KB)
|
Source
|
International Conference on Management of Data
archive
Proceedings of the 35th SIGMOD international conference on Management of data
table of contents
Providence, Rhode Island, USA
DEMONSTRATION SESSION: Demonstration session: group D
table of contents
Pages 1115-1118
Year of Publication: 2009
ISBN:978-1-60558-551-2
|
|
Authors
|
|
Bin Liu
|
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
|
|
H. V. Jagadish
|
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
|
|
| Sponsors |
|
| Publisher |
|
| Bibliometrics |
Downloads (6 Weeks): 21, Downloads (12 Months): 87, Citation Count: 0
|
|
|
ABSTRACT
When a database query has a large number of results, the user can only be shown one page of results at a time. One popular approach is to rank results such that the "best" results appear first. This approach is well-suited for information retrieval, and for some database queries, such as similarity queries or under-specified (or keyword) queries with known (or guessable) user preferences. However, standard database query results comprise a set of tuples, with no associated ranking. It is typical to allow users the ability to sort results on selected attributes, but no actual ranking is defined. An alternative approach is not to try to show the estimated best results on the first page, but instead to help users learn what is available in the whole result set and direct them to finding what they need. We present DataLens, a framework that: i) generates the most representative data points to display on the first page without sorting or ranking, ii) allows users to drill-down to more similar items in a hierarchical fashion, and iii) dynamically adjusts the representatives based on the user's new query conditions. To the best of our knowledge, DataLens is the first to allow hierarchical database result browsing and searching at the same time.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
 |
1
|
Eugene Agichtein , Eric Brill , Susan Dumais , Robert Ragno, Learning user interaction models for predicting web search result preferences, Proceedings of the 29th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval, August 06-11, 2006, Seattle, Washington, USA
[doi> 10.1145/1148170.1148175]
|
 |
2
|
|
 |
3
|
|
 |
4
|
|
| |
5
|
|
 |
6
|
|
 |
7
|
|
| |
8
|
L. Kaufman and P. Rousseeuw. Finding groups in data. an introduction to cluster analysis. Wiley Series in Probability and Mathematical Statistics. Applied Probability and Statistics, New York: Wiley, 1990, 1990.
|
| |
9
|
|
| |
10
|
|
| |
11
|
R. Nosofsky and S. Zaki. Exemplar and prototype models revisited: Response strategies, selective attention, and stimulus generalization. Learning, Memory, 28(5):924--940, 2002.
|
| |
12
|
Tianyi Wu , Xiaolei Li , Dong Xin , Jiawei Han , Jacob Lee , Ricardo Redder, DataScope: viewing database contents in Google Maps' way, Proceedings of the 33rd international conference on Very large data bases, September 23-27, 2007, Vienna, Austria
|
 |
13
|
Tian Zhang , Raghu Ramakrishnan , Miron Livny, BIRCH: an efficient data clustering method for very large databases, Proceedings of the 1996 ACM SIGMOD international conference on Management of data, p.103-114, June 04-06, 1996, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
|
|