ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Robust web extraction: an approach based on a probabilistic tree-edit model
Full text PdfPdf (871 KB)
Source
International Conference on Management of Data archive
Proceedings of the 35th SIGMOD international conference on Management of data table of contents
Providence, Rhode Island, USA
SESSION: Research session 9: data on the web table of contents
Pages 335-348  
Year of Publication: 2009
ISBN:978-1-60558-551-2
Authors
Nilesh Dalvi  Yahoo! Research, Santa Clara, CA, USA
Philip Bohannon  Yahoo! Research, Santa Clara, CA, USA
Fei Sha  University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGMOD: ACM Special Interest Group on Management of Data
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 62,   Downloads (12 Months): 240,   Citation Count: 1
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1559845.1559882
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

On script-generated web sites, many documents share common HTML tree structure, allowing wrappers to effectively extract information of interest. Of course, the scripts and thus the tree structure evolve over time, causing wrappers to break repeatedly, and resulting in a high cost of maintaining wrappers. In this paper, we explore a novel approach: we use temporal snapshots of web pages to develop a tree-edit model of HTML, and use this model to improve wrapper construction. We view the changes to the tree structure as suppositions of a series of edit operations: deleting nodes, inserting nodes and substituting labels of nodes. The tree structures evolve by choosing these edit operations stochastically.

Our model is attractive in that the probability that a source tree has evolved into a target tree can be estimated efficiently--in quadratic time in the size of the trees--making it a potentially useful tool for a variety of tree-evolution problems. We give an algorithm to learn the probabilistic model from training examples consisting of pairs of trees, and apply this algorithm to collections of web-page snapshots to derive HTML-specific tree edit models. Finally, we describe a novel wrapper-construction framework that takes the tree-edit model into account, and compare the quality of resulting wrappers to that of traditional wrappers on synthetic and real HTML document examples.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
Tobias Anton. Xpath-wrapper induction by generating tree traversal patterns. In LWA, pages 126--133, 2005.
 
3
Internet archive: http://www.archive.org/.
 
4
 
5
Marc Bernard, Amaury Habrard, and Marc Sebban. Learning stochastic tree edit distance. In ECML, pages 42--53, 2006.
 
6
 
7
8
9
 
10
 
11
12
 
13
 
14
Internet movie database: http://www.imdb.com/.
 
15
Kevin Knight and JonathaGraehl. An overview of probabilistic tree transducers for natural language processing. In Proceedings of the CICLing, 2005.
 
16
17
 
18
Nickolas Kushmerick, Daniel S. Weld, and Robert B. Doorenbos. Wrapper induction for information extraction. In IJCAI, pages 729--737, 1997.
 
19
Kristina Lerman, Steven N. Minton, and Craig A. Knoblock. Wrapper maintenance: A machine learning approach. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 18:2003, 2003.
 
20
A. McCallum, K. Bellare, and P. Pereira. A conditional random field for discriminatively-trained finite-state string edit distance. In UAI, 2005.
 
21
 
22
I. Muslea, S. Minton, and C. Knoblock. Stalker: Learning extraction rules for semistructured, 1998.
 
23
Jussi Myllymaki and Jared Jackson. Robust web data extraction with xml path expressions. Technical report, IBM Research Report RJ 10245, May 2002.
 
24
Andrew Ng and Michael Jordan. On discriminative vs. generative classifiers: A comparison of logistic regression and naive bayes. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 2001 (NIPS 14), 2002.
 
25
Jorge Nocedal and Stephen J. Wright. Numerical Optimization. Springer, 1999.
 
26
 
27
J. S. Provan and M. O. Ball. The complexity of counting cuts and of computing the probability that a graph is connected. SIAM J. Comput., 12(4):777--788, 1983.
 
28
 
29
 
30
 
31
L. Valiant. The complexity of enumeration and reliability problems. SIAM J. Comput., 8:410--421, 1979.
 
32


Collaborative Colleagues:
Nilesh Dalvi: colleagues
Philip Bohannon: colleagues
Fei Sha: colleagues