ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
XML with incomplete information: models, properties, and query answering
Full text PdfPdf (658 KB)
Source
Symposium on Principles of Database Systems archive
Proceedings of the twenty-eighth ACM SIGMOD-SIGACT-SIGART symposium on Principles of database systems table of contents
Providence, Rhode Island, USA
SESSION: XML table of contents
Pages 237-246  
Year of Publication: 2009
ISBN:978-1-60558-553-6
Authors
Pablo Barceló  University of Chile, Santiago, Chile
Leonid Libkin  University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
Antonella Poggi  Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
Cristina Sirangelo  ENS-Cachan, Cachan, France
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGACT: ACM Special Interest Group on Algorithms and Computation Theory
SIGMOD: ACM Special Interest Group on Management of Data
SIGART: ACM Special Interest Group on Artificial Intelligence
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 12,   Downloads (12 Months): 73,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1559795.1559832
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

We study models of incomplete information for XML, their computational properties, and query answering. While our approach is motivated by the study of relational incompleteness, incomplete information in XML documents may appear not only as null values but also as missing structural information. Our goal is to provide a classification of incomplete descriptions of XML documents, and separate features - or groups of features - that lead to hard computational problems from those that admit efficient algorithms. Our classification of incomplete information is based on the combination of null values with partial structural descriptions of documents. The key computational problems we consider are consistency of partial descriptions, representability of complete documents by incomplete ones, and query answering. We show how factors such as schema information, the presence of node ids, and missing structural information affect the complexity of these main computational problems, and find robust classes of incomplete XML descriptions that permit tractable query evaluation.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
 
2
3
 
4
S. Abiteboul, R. Hull and V. Vianu. Foundations of Databases, Addison Wesley, 1995.
 
5
6
7
 
8
H. Bjorklund, W. Martens, T. Schwentick. Conjunctive query containment over trees. DBPL'07, pages 66--80.
 
9
10
 
11
D. Calvanese, G. De Giacomo, M. Lenzerini. Semi-structured data with constraints and incomplete information. Description Logics, 1998.
 
12
D. Calvanese, G. De Giacomo, M. Lenzerini. Representing and reasoning on XML documents: a description logic approach. J. Log. Comput. 9 (1999), 295--318.
13
 
14
 
15
 
16
Document Object Model (DOM). W3C Recommendation, April 2004. http://www.w3.org/TR/DOM--Level--3--Core.
 
17
18
19
20
 
21
Y. Kanza, W. Nutt, Y. Sagiv. Querying incomplete information in semistructured data. JCSS 64 (2002), 655--693.
 
22
Ph. Kolaitis and M. Vardi. A logical approach to constraint satisfaction. In Finite Model Theory and its Applications, Springer 2007, pages 339--370.
23
 
24
 
25
T. Schwentick. A little bit infinite? On adding data to finitely labelled structures. In STACS'08, pages 17--18.
 
26
L. Segoufin. Automata and logics for words and trees over an infinite alphabet. In CSL'06, pages 41--57.
27
 
28

Collaborative Colleagues:
Pablo Barceló: colleagues
Leonid Libkin: colleagues
Antonella Poggi: colleagues
Cristina Sirangelo: colleagues