| Optimal tracking of distributed heavy hitters and quantiles |
| Full text |
Pdf
(494 KB)
|
Source
|
Symposium on Principles of Database Systems
archive
Proceedings of the twenty-eighth ACM SIGMOD-SIGACT-SIGART symposium on Principles of database systems
table of contents
Providence, Rhode Island, USA
SESSION: Stream processing
table of contents
Pages 167-174
Year of Publication: 2009
ISBN:978-1-60558-553-6
|
|
Authors
|
|
| Sponsors |
|
| Publisher |
|
| Bibliometrics |
Downloads (6 Weeks): 9, Downloads (12 Months): 41, Citation Count: 0
|
|
|
ABSTRACT
We consider the the problem of tracking heavy hitters and quantiles in the distributed streaming model. The heavy hitters and quantiles are two important statistics for characterizing a data distribution. Let A be a multiset of elements, drawn from the universe U={1,...,u}. For a given 0 ≤ Φ ≤ 1, the Φ-heavy hitters are those elements of A whose frequency in A is at least Φ |A|; the Φ-quantile of A is an element x of U such that at most Φ|A| elements of A are smaller than A and at most (1-Φ)|A| elements of A are greater than x. Suppose the elements of A are received at k remote sites over time, and each of the sites has a two-way communication channel to a designated coordinator, whose goal is to track the set of Φ-heavy hitters and the Φ-quantile of A approximately at all times with minimum communication. We give tracking algorithms with worst-case communication cost O(k/ε ⋅ log n) for both problems, where n is the total number of items in A, and ε is the approximation error. This substantially improves upon the previous known algorithms. We also give matching lower bounds on the communication costs for both problems, showing that our algorithms are optimal. We also consider a more general version of the problem where we simultaneously track the Φ-quantiles for all 0 ≤ Φ ≤ 1.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
| |
1
|
|
 |
2
|
Brian Babcock , Shivnath Babu , Mayur Datar , Rajeev Motwani , Jennifer Widom, Models and issues in data stream systems, Proceedings of the twenty-first ACM SIGMOD-SIGACT-SIGART symposium on Principles of database systems, June 03-05, 2002, Madison, Wisconsin
[doi> 10.1145/543613.543615]
|
 |
3
|
|
| |
4
|
|
 |
5
|
|
| |
6
|
|
 |
7
|
Graham Cormode , Flip Korn , S. Muthukrishnan , Divesh Srivastava, Space- and time-efficient deterministic algorithms for biased quantiles over data streams, Proceedings of the twenty-fifth ACM SIGMOD-SIGACT-SIGART symposium on Principles of database systems, June 26-28, 2006, Chicago, IL, USA
[doi> 10.1145/1142351.1142389]
|
 |
8
|
|
| |
9
|
|
| |
10
|
|
| |
11
|
G. Cormode, S. Muthukrishnan, and W. Zhuang. Conquering the divide: Continuous clustering of distributed data streams. In Proc. IEEE International Conference on Data Engineering, 2007.
|
| |
12
|
Amol Deshpande , Carlos Guestrin , Samuel R. Madden , Joseph M. Hellerstein , Wei Hong, Model-driven data acquisition in sensor networks, Proceedings of the Thirtieth international conference on Very large data bases, p.588-599, August 31-September 03, 2004, Toronto, Canada
|
| |
13
|
|
| |
14
|
Anna C. Gilbert , Yannis Kotidis , S. Muthukrishnan , Martin J. Strauss, How to summarize the universe: dynamic maintenance of quantiles, Proceedings of the 28th international conference on Very Large Data Bases, p.454-465, August 20-23, 2002, Hong Kong, China
|
 |
15
|
|
 |
16
|
|
 |
17
|
|
| |
18
|
|
| |
19
|
|
 |
20
|
|
 |
21
|
|
| |
22
|
C. Olston and J. Widom. Efficient monitoring and querying of distributed, dynamic data via approximate replication. IEEE Data Engineering Bulletin, 2005.
|
 |
23
|
|
 |
24
|
|
|