ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Relationship privacy: output perturbation for queries with joins
Full text PdfPdf (454 KB)
Source
Symposium on Principles of Database Systems archive
Proceedings of the twenty-eighth ACM SIGMOD-SIGACT-SIGART symposium on Principles of database systems table of contents
Providence, Rhode Island, USA
SESSION: Extended models table of contents
Pages 107-116  
Year of Publication: 2009
ISBN:978-1-60558-553-6
Authors
Vibhor Rastogi  University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
Michael Hay  UMass Amherst, Amherst, MA, USA
Gerome Miklau  UMass Amherst, Amherst, MA, USA
Dan Suciu  University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGACT: ACM Special Interest Group on Algorithms and Computation Theory
SIGMOD: ACM Special Interest Group on Management of Data
SIGART: ACM Special Interest Group on Artificial Intelligence
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 14,   Downloads (12 Months): 67,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1559795.1559812
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

We study privacy-preserving query answering over data containing relationships. A social network is a prime example of such data, where the nodes represent individuals and edges represent relationships. Nearly all interesting queries over social networks involve joins, and for such queries, existing output perturbation algorithms severely distort query answers. We propose an algorithm that significantly improves utility over competing techniques, typically reducing the error bound from polynomial in the number of nodes to polylogarithmic. The algorithm is, to the best of our knowledge, the first to answer such queries with acceptable accuracy, even for worst-case inputs.

The improved utility is achieved by relaxing the privacy condition. Instead of ensuring strict differential privacy, we guarantee a weaker (but still quite practical) condition based on adversarial privacy. To explain precisely the nature of our relaxation in privacy, we provide a new result that characterizes the relationship between ε-indistinguishability~(a variant of the differential privacy definition) and adversarial privacy, which is of independent interest: an algorithm is ε-indistinguishable iff it is private for a particular class of adversaries (defined precisely herein). Our perturbation algorithm guarantees privacy against adversaries in this class whose prior distribution is numerically bounded.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
 
2
H. W. Block, T. H. Savits, and M. Shaked. Some concepts of negative dependence. In Ann. of Prob., 1982.
 
3
A. Campan and T. M. Truta. A clustering approach for data and structural anonymity in social networks. In PinKDD, 2008.
 
4
C. Dwork. Differential privacy. In ICALP, 2006.
 
5
C. Dwork, F. McSherry, K. Nissim, and A. Smith. Calibrating noise to sensitivity in private data analysis. In TCC, 2006.
6
7
8
 
9
Full version: http://www.cs.washington.edu/homes/vibhor/relationship_privacy.pdf.
10
 
11
12
 
13
14
 
15
M. Newman. The structure and function of complex networks. SIREV: SIAM Review, 2003.
16
 
17
 
18
J. G. Shanthikumar and H.-W. Koo. On uniform conditional stochastic order conditioned on planar regions. In Ann. of Probab., 1990.
 
19
 
20
X. Ying and X. Wu. Randomizing social networks: a spectrum preserving approach. In SIAM, 2007.
 
21
E. Zheleva and L. Getoor. Preserving the privacy of sensitive relationships in graph data. In PinKDD, 2007.
 
22


Collaborative Colleagues:
Vibhor Rastogi: colleagues
Michael Hay: colleagues
Gerome Miklau: colleagues
Dan Suciu: colleagues