ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
An implementation of argument based discussion
Full text PdfPdf (144 KB)
Source
International Conference on Autonomous Agents archive
Proceedings of The 8th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems - Volume 2 table of contents
Budapest, Hungary
DEMONSTRATION SESSION: Student demos table of contents
Pages 1425-1426  
Year of Publication: 2009
ISBN:978-0-9817381-7-8
Authors
Patrizio Barbini  University of Luxembourg, Coudenhove-Kalergi, Luxembourg
Yining Wu  University of Luxembourg, Coudenhove-Kalergi, Luxembourg
Martin Caminada  University of Luxembourg, Coudenhove-Kalergi, Luxembourg
Sponsors
: The Foundation for Intelligent Physical Agents
Microsoft Research : Microsoft Research
: Whitestein Technologies
: European Office of Aerospace Research and Development, Air Force Office of Scientific Research, United States Air Force Research Laboratory
: Drexel University
: Wiley -- Blackwell Ltd
Publisher
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 6,   Downloads (12 Months): 19,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  

ABSTRACT

With the current demonstrator, we present an implementation of formal argumentation that is not only able to evaluate an argument according to standard argumentation semantics, but is also able to engage in a discussion to defend its answer. This discussion is formal yet natural enough to be applicable in agent-to-agent as well as in agent-to-human settings.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Martin Caminada and Yining Wu. An argument game of stable semantics. Logic Journal of IGPL, in print.
 
2
M. W. A. Caminada. For the sake of the Argument. Explorations into argument-based reasoning. Doctoral dissertation Free University Amsterdam, 2004.
 
3
M. W. A. Caminada. On the issue of reinstatement in argumentation. In M. Fischer, W. van der Hoek, B. Konev, and A. Lisitsa, editors, Logics in Artificial Intelligence; 10th European Conference, JELIA 2006, pages 111--123. Springer, 2006. LNAI 4160.
 
4
 
5
 
6
H. Prakken and G. Sartor. Argument-based extended logic programming with defeasible priorities. Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics, 7:25--75, 1997.
 
7
Iyad Rahwan, Simon Parsons, and Chris Reed, editors. Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems, 4th International Workshop, ArgMAS 2007, Honolulu, HI, USA, May 15, 2007, Revised Selected and Invited Papers, volume 4946 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer, 2008.
 
8
 
9

Collaborative Colleagues:
Patrizio Barbini: colleagues
Yining Wu: colleagues
Martin Caminada: colleagues