Dynamics in argumentation with single extensions

Subscribe (Full Service)


	Search: The ACM Digital Library The Guide

	Feedback

Dynamics in argumentation with single extensions: attack refinement and the grounded extension

Full text

Pdf (156 KB)

Source

International Conference on Autonomous Agents archive
Proceedings of The 8th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems - Volume 2 table of contents

Budapest, Hungary

SESSION: Interactions table of contents

Pages 1213-1214

Year of Publication: 2009

ISBN:978-0-9817381-7-8

Authors

Guido Boella	Università di Torino, Torino, Italy
Souhila Kaci	CRIL, CNRS UMR, IUT de Lens, France
Leendert van der Torre	University of Luxembourg, Luxembourg

Sponsors

: The Foundation for Intelligent Physical Agents
Microsoft Research : Microsoft Research
: Whitestein Technologies
: European Office of Aerospace Research and Development, Air Force Office of Scientific Research, United States Air Force Research Laboratory
: Drexel University
: Wiley -- Blackwell Ltd

Publisher

International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems Richland, SC

Bibliometrics

Downloads (6 Weeks): 10, Downloads (12 Months): 19, Citation Count: 0

Additional Information:

abstract references index terms collaborative colleagues

Tools and Actions:	Review this Article Save this Article to a Binder Display Formats: BibTeX EndNote ACM Ref

ABSTRACT

We introduce nine attack refinement principles stating whether the extension stays the same if we add a single attack, and we show that the grounded extension satisfies five of them. We define also an extension called acyclic attack refinement by adding a loop condition, and we show that the grounded extension satisfies one of the acyclic attack refinement principles. Moreover, we define an extension called conditional attack refinement taking alternative attackers into account, and we give an example of a conditional attack refinement principle satisfied by the grounded extension.

REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

	1	Pietro Baroni , Massimiliano Giacomin, On principle-based evaluation of extension-based argumentation semantics, Artificial Intelligence, v.171 n.10-15, p.675-700, July, 2007 [doi>10.1016/j.artint.2007.04.004]
	2	Howard Barringer, Dov M. Gabbay, and John Woods. Temporal dynamics of support and attack networks: From argumentation to zoology. In Mechanizing Mathematical Reasoning, volume 2605 of LNCS, pages 59--98. Springer, 2005.
	3	Martin Caminada. On the issue of reinstatement in argumentation. In Logics in Artificial Intelligence, 10th European Conference, JELIA 2006, volume 4160 of LNCS, pages 111--123. Springer, 2006.
	4	Claudette Cayrol, Florence Dupin de Saint-Cyr, and Marie-Christine Lagasquie-Schiex. Revision of an argumentation system. In 11th International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR'08), pages 124--134, 2008.
	5	Phan Minh Dung, On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games, Artificial Intelligence, v.77 n.2, p.321-357, Sept. 1995 [doi>10.1016/0004-3702(94)00041-X]
	6	Nicolás D. Rotstein, Martín O. Moguillansky, Alejandro J. Garcia, and Guillermo R. Simari. An abstract argumentation framework for handling dynamics. In Proceedings of the Argument, Dialogue and Decision Workshop in NMR 2008, pages 131--139, 2008.