ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Bounded practical social reasoning in the ESB framework
Full text PdfPdf (454 KB)
Source
International Conference on Autonomous Agents archive
Proceedings of The 8th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems - Volume 2 table of contents
Budapest, Hungary
SESSION: Agent reasoning/deliberation/decision mechanisms table of contents
Pages 1097-1104  
Year of Publication: 2009
ISBN:978-0-9817381-7-8
Authors
Iain Wallace  The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
Michael Rovatsos  The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
Sponsors
: The Foundation for Intelligent Physical Agents
Microsoft Research : Microsoft Research
: Whitestein Technologies
: European Office of Aerospace Research and Development, Air Force Office of Scientific Research, United States Air Force Research Laboratory
: Drexel University
: Wiley -- Blackwell Ltd
Publisher
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 17,   Downloads (12 Months): 30,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  

ABSTRACT

Reasoning about others, as performed by agents in order to coordinate their behaviours with those of others, commonly involves forming and updating beliefs about hidden system properties such as other agents' mental states. In this paper we introduce the Expectation-Strategy-Behaviour (ESB) framework which provides a generic machinery for such practical social reasoning and can be easily coupled with deliberative, knowledge-based architectures such as BDI. We present a conceptual model of ESB, its formal semantics, and simple initial reasoning algorithms that illustrate how the principles of ESB can be used to implement bounded "social" rationality in multiagent designs. A case study is used to show how ESB substantially simplifies the design of agents that include social reasoning functionality.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Rummy.com - The Rules of Rummy, 2008. http://rummy.com/rummyrules.html.
 
2
M. E. Bratman, D. J. Israel, and M. E. Pollack. Plans and resource-bounded practical reasoning. Computational Intelligence, 4(4):349--355, 1988.
 
3
F. Dignum, D. Kinny, and L. Sonenberg. From Desires, Obligations and Norms to Goals. Cognitive Science Quarterly, 2(3--4):407--430, 2002.
 
4
P. Gärdenfors, editor. Belief Revsion (Cambridge Tracts in Theoretical Computer Science). Cambridge University Press, 1992.
 
5
 
6
N. Jennings. Commitments and conventions: The foundation of coordination in multiagent systems. Knowledge Engineering Review, 8(3):223--50, 1993.
 
7
A. S. Rao and M. Georgeff. An abstract architecture for rational agents. In W. S. C. Rich and B. Nebel, editors, Proceedings of Knowledge Represenation and Reasoning (KR&R-92), 1992.
8
 
9
G. Weiß, editor. Multiagent Systems. A Modern Approach to Distributed Artificial Intelligence. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1999.
 
10
M. Wooldridge. Reasoning about Rational Agents. The MIT Press, 2000.
 
11
 
12
M. Wooldridge, M.-P. Huget, M. Fisher, and S. Parsons. Model checking for multiagent systems: The MABLE language and its applications. Int. J. Artif. Intell. T., 15(2):195--225, 2006.

Collaborative Colleagues:
Iain Wallace: colleagues
Michael Rovatsos: colleagues