| Bounded practical social reasoning in the ESB framework |
| Full text |
Pdf
(454 KB)
|
Source
|
International Conference on Autonomous Agents
archive
Proceedings of The 8th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems - Volume 2
table of contents
Budapest, Hungary
SESSION: Agent reasoning/deliberation/decision mechanisms
table of contents
Pages 1097-1104
Year of Publication: 2009
ISBN:978-0-9817381-7-8
|
|
Authors
|
|
| Sponsors |
|
| Publisher |
|
| Bibliometrics |
Downloads (6 Weeks): 17, Downloads (12 Months): 30, Citation Count: 0
|
|
|
ABSTRACT
Reasoning about others, as performed by agents in order to coordinate their behaviours with those of others, commonly involves forming and updating beliefs about hidden system properties such as other agents' mental states. In this paper we introduce the Expectation-Strategy-Behaviour (ESB) framework which provides a generic machinery for such practical social reasoning and can be easily coupled with deliberative, knowledge-based architectures such as BDI. We present a conceptual model of ESB, its formal semantics, and simple initial reasoning algorithms that illustrate how the principles of ESB can be used to implement bounded "social" rationality in multiagent designs. A case study is used to show how ESB substantially simplifies the design of agents that include social reasoning functionality.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
| |
1
|
Rummy.com - The Rules of Rummy, 2008. http://rummy.com/rummyrules.html.
|
| |
2
|
M. E. Bratman, D. J. Israel, and M. E. Pollack. Plans and resource-bounded practical reasoning. Computational Intelligence, 4(4):349--355, 1988.
|
| |
3
|
F. Dignum, D. Kinny, and L. Sonenberg. From Desires, Obligations and Norms to Goals. Cognitive Science Quarterly, 2(3--4):407--430, 2002.
|
| |
4
|
P. Gärdenfors, editor. Belief Revsion (Cambridge Tracts in Theoretical Computer Science). Cambridge University Press, 1992.
|
| |
5
|
|
| |
6
|
N. Jennings. Commitments and conventions: The foundation of coordination in multiagent systems. Knowledge Engineering Review, 8(3):223--50, 1993.
|
| |
7
|
A. S. Rao and M. Georgeff. An abstract architecture for rational agents. In W. S. C. Rich and B. Nebel, editors, Proceedings of Knowledge Represenation and Reasoning (KR&R-92), 1992.
|
 |
8
|
|
| |
9
|
G. Weiß, editor. Multiagent Systems. A Modern Approach to Distributed Artificial Intelligence. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1999.
|
| |
10
|
M. Wooldridge. Reasoning about Rational Agents. The MIT Press, 2000.
|
| |
11
|
|
| |
12
|
M. Wooldridge, M.-P. Huget, M. Fisher, and S. Parsons. Model checking for multiagent systems: The MABLE language and its applications. Int. J. Artif. Intell. T., 15(2):195--225, 2006.
|
|