|
ABSTRACT
The process of planning in complex, multi-actor environment depends strongly on the ability of the individual actors to perform intelligent decommitment upon specific changes in the environment. Reasoning about decommitment alternatives during the planning process contributes to flexibility and robustness of the resulting plan. In this article we formally introduce and discuss three specific decommitment rules: (i) relaxation, (ii) delegation and (iii) full decommitment. We argue that appropriate selection, setting and preference ordering of the decommitment rules contributes to robustness (measured as a number of failures) of the overall plans. The presented claims are supported by empirical experiments.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
| |
1
|
|
| |
2
|
C. Boutilier, T. Dean, and S. Hanks. Decision-theoretic planning: Structural assumptions and computational leverage. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 11:1--94, 1999.
|
| |
3
|
|
| |
4
|
|
| |
5
|
H. Levesque, P. Cohen, and J. Nunes. On acting together. In AAAI-90 Proceedings, Eighth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, volume 2, pages 94--99, Cambridge, MA, USA, 1990. MIT Press.
|
| |
6
|
S. M. Majercik and M. L. Littman. MAXPLAN: A new approach to probabilistic planning. In Artificial Intelligence Planning Systems, pages 86--93, 1998.
|
| |
7
|
A. Mallya, P. Yolum, and M. Singh. Resolving commitments among autonomous agents. In F. Dignum, editor, Advances in Agent Communication. International Workshop on Agent Communication Languages, ACL 2003, volume 2922 of LNCS, pages 166--82. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany, 2003.
|
| |
8
|
D. J. Musliner, E. H. Durfee, and K. G. Shin. CIRCA: A cooperative intelligent real time control architecture. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 23(6):1561--1574, -- 1993.
|
| |
9
|
|
| |
10
|
|
| |
11
|
M. Veloso and P. Stone. Flecs: Planning with a flexible commitment strategy. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 3:25--52, 1995.
|
| |
12
|
M. Wooldridge. Reasoning about Rational Agents. Intelligent robotics and autonomous agents. The MIT Press, 2000.
|
| |
13
|
M. Wooldridge and N. Jennings. Cooperative problem solving. Journal of Logics and Computation, 9(4):563--594, 1999.
|
| |
14
|
Ping Xuan , Victor R. Lesser, Incorporating Uncertainty in Agent Commitments, 6th International Workshop on Intelligent Agents VI, Agent Theories, Architectures, and Languages (ATAL),, p.57-70, July 15-17, 1999
|
CITED BY
|
|
Antonín Komenda , Jiří Vokřínek , Michal Pěchouček , Gerhard Wickler , Jeff Dalton , Austin Tate, Distributed planning and coordination in non-deterministic environments, Proceedings of The 8th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, May 10-15, 2009, Budapest, Hungary
|
INDEX TERMS
Primary Classification:
I.
Computing Methodologies
I.2
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
I.2.11
Distributed Artificial Intelligence
Subjects:
Intelligent agents
Additional Classification:
I.
Computing Methodologies
I.2
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
I.2.8
Problem Solving, Control Methods, and Search
Subjects:
Plan execution, formation, and generation
General Terms:
Experimentation,
Measurement,
Performance,
Reliability,
Verification
Keywords:
commitments based planning,
decommitment rule,
non-deterministic environment,
social commitment
|