ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
A logic of games and propositional control
Full text PdfPdf (238 KB)
Source
International Conference on Autonomous Agents archive
Proceedings of The 8th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems - Volume 2 table of contents
Budapest, Hungary
SESSION: Commitments/logical approaches table of contents
Pages 961-968  
Year of Publication: 2009
ISBN:978-0-9817381-7-8
Authors
Nicolas Troquard  University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
Wiebe van der Hoek  University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
Michael Wooldridge  University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
Sponsors
: The Foundation for Intelligent Physical Agents
Microsoft Research : Microsoft Research
: Whitestein Technologies
: European Office of Aerospace Research and Development, Air Force Office of Scientific Research, United States Air Force Research Laboratory
: Drexel University
: Wiley -- Blackwell Ltd
Publisher
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 12,   Downloads (12 Months): 21,   Citation Count: 1
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  

ABSTRACT

We present a logic for reasoning about strategic games. The logic is a modal formalism, based on the Coalition Logic of Propositional Control, to which we add the notions of outcomes and preferences over outcomes. We study the underlying structure of powers of coalitions as they are expressed in their effectivity function, and formalise a collection of solution concepts. We provide a sound and complete axiomatisation for the logic, and we demonstrate its features by applying it to some problems from social choice theory.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
J. Abdou. Rectangular game forms. Working paper. ftp://mse.univ-paris1.fr/pub/mse/cahiers2002/B02114.pdf.
 
2
J. Abdou and K. Keiding. Effectivity Functions in Social Choice Theory. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, 1991.
3
 
4
R. Alur, L. de Alfaro, T. A. Henzinger, S. C. Krishnan, F. Y. C. Mang, S. Qadeer, S. K. Rajamani, and S. Taşiran. mocha user manual. University of Berkeley Report, 2000.
 
5
 
6
C. Areces and B. ten Cate. Handbook of Modal Logic, chapter Hybrid Logics, pp. 821--868. Elsevier Science Inc. 2006.
 
7
K. J. Arrow, A. K. Sen, and K. Suzumura, editors. Handbook of Social Choice and Welfare, volume 1. Elsevier, 2002.
 
8
 
9
E. Bonzon, M. C. Lagasquie-Shiex, and J. Lang. Efficient coalitions in Boolean games. In New Perspectives on Games and Interaction. Texts in Logic and Games, 4, pp. 283--297. Amsterdam University Press, 2007.
10
 
11
A. Gibbard. A Pareto-consistent libertarian claim. Journal of Economic Theory, 7(4), pp. 388--410, 1974.
 
12
P. Girard. Modal logic for belief and preference change. PhD thesis, Stanford University, 2008.
 
13
 
14
S. Hansson. Preference Logic. In Handbook of Philosophical Logic: Volume IV, Second edition, D. Gabbay and F. Guenthner, editors, Springer, pp. 319--393, 2001.
 
15
J. F. Horty and N. D. Belnap, Jr. The deliberative stit: A study of action, omission, and obligation. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 24(6), pp. 583--644, 1995.
 
16
E. Maskin and T. Sjöström. Handbook of Social Choice and Welfare, chapter Implementation Theory, pp. 237--288. Volume 1 of Arrow et al. {7}, 2002.
 
17
M. J. Osborne and A. Rubinstein. A Course in Game Theory. The MIT Press, 1994.
 
18
R. Parikh. Social software. Synthese, 132(3), pp. 187--211, 2002.
 
19
M. Pauly. A modal logic for coalitional power in games. Journal of Logic and Computation, 12(1), pp. 149--166, 2002.
 
20
B. Peleg, H. Peters, and T. Storcken. Nash consistent representation of constitutions: A reaction to the Gibbard paradox. Mathematical Social Sciences, 43, pp. 267--287, 2002.
 
21
 
22
J. van Benthem. Open problems in logic and games. In S. N. Artëmov, H. Barringer, A. S. d'Avila Garcez, L. C. Lamb, and J. Woods, editors, We Will Show Them! Essays in Honour of Dov Gabbay, volume 1, pp. 229--264. King's College Publications, London, 2005.
 
23
J. van Benthem, O. Roy, and P. Girard. Everything else being equal: A modal logic approach to Ceteris Paribus preferences. In Journal of Philosophical Logic, 38(1), pp. 83--125, 2008.
 
24
J. van Benthem, S. van Otterloo, and O. Roy. Preference Logic, Conditionals, and Solution Concepts in Games. In H. Lagerlund, S. Lindström, and R. Sliwinski, editors, Modality Matters, pp. 61--76. University of Uppsala, 2006.
 
25


Collaborative Colleagues:
Nicolas Troquard: colleagues
Wiebe van der Hoek: colleagues
Michael Wooldridge: colleagues