|
ABSTRACT
We present a logic for reasoning about strategic games. The logic is a modal formalism, based on the Coalition Logic of Propositional Control, to which we add the notions of outcomes and preferences over outcomes. We study the underlying structure of powers of coalitions as they are expressed in their effectivity function, and formalise a collection of solution concepts. We provide a sound and complete axiomatisation for the logic, and we demonstrate its features by applying it to some problems from social choice theory.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
| |
1
|
J. Abdou. Rectangular game forms. Working paper. ftp://mse.univ-paris1.fr/pub/mse/cahiers2002/B02114.pdf.
|
| |
2
|
J. Abdou and K. Keiding. Effectivity Functions in Social Choice Theory. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, 1991.
|
 |
3
|
|
| |
4
|
R. Alur, L. de Alfaro, T. A. Henzinger, S. C. Krishnan, F. Y. C. Mang, S. Qadeer, S. K. Rajamani, and S. Taşiran. mocha user manual. University of Berkeley Report, 2000.
|
| |
5
|
|
| |
6
|
C. Areces and B. ten Cate. Handbook of Modal Logic, chapter Hybrid Logics, pp. 821--868. Elsevier Science Inc. 2006.
|
| |
7
|
K. J. Arrow, A. K. Sen, and K. Suzumura, editors. Handbook of Social Choice and Welfare, volume 1. Elsevier, 2002.
|
| |
8
|
|
| |
9
|
E. Bonzon, M. C. Lagasquie-Shiex, and J. Lang. Efficient coalitions in Boolean games. In New Perspectives on Games and Interaction. Texts in Logic and Games, 4, pp. 283--297. Amsterdam University Press, 2007.
|
 |
10
|
|
| |
11
|
A. Gibbard. A Pareto-consistent libertarian claim. Journal of Economic Theory, 7(4), pp. 388--410, 1974.
|
| |
12
|
P. Girard. Modal logic for belief and preference change. PhD thesis, Stanford University, 2008.
|
| |
13
|
|
| |
14
|
S. Hansson. Preference Logic. In Handbook of Philosophical Logic: Volume IV, Second edition, D. Gabbay and F. Guenthner, editors, Springer, pp. 319--393, 2001.
|
| |
15
|
J. F. Horty and N. D. Belnap, Jr. The deliberative stit: A study of action, omission, and obligation. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 24(6), pp. 583--644, 1995.
|
| |
16
|
E. Maskin and T. Sjöström. Handbook of Social Choice and Welfare, chapter Implementation Theory, pp. 237--288. Volume 1 of Arrow et al. {7}, 2002.
|
| |
17
|
M. J. Osborne and A. Rubinstein. A Course in Game Theory. The MIT Press, 1994.
|
| |
18
|
R. Parikh. Social software. Synthese, 132(3), pp. 187--211, 2002.
|
| |
19
|
M. Pauly. A modal logic for coalitional power in games. Journal of Logic and Computation, 12(1), pp. 149--166, 2002.
|
| |
20
|
B. Peleg, H. Peters, and T. Storcken. Nash consistent representation of constitutions: A reaction to the Gibbard paradox. Mathematical Social Sciences, 43, pp. 267--287, 2002.
|
| |
21
|
Nicolas Troquard , Wiebe Hoek , Michael Wooldridge, Model Checking Strategic Equilibria, Model Checking and Artificial Intelligence: 5th International Workshop, MoChArt 2008, Patras, Greece, July 21, 2008. Revised Selected and Invited Papers, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2009
[doi> 10.1007/978-3-642-00431-5_11]
|
| |
22
|
J. van Benthem. Open problems in logic and games. In S. N. Artëmov, H. Barringer, A. S. d'Avila Garcez, L. C. Lamb, and J. Woods, editors, We Will Show Them! Essays in Honour of Dov Gabbay, volume 1, pp. 229--264. King's College Publications, London, 2005.
|
| |
23
|
J. van Benthem, O. Roy, and P. Girard. Everything else being equal: A modal logic approach to Ceteris Paribus preferences. In Journal of Philosophical Logic, 38(1), pp. 83--125, 2008.
|
| |
24
|
J. van Benthem, S. van Otterloo, and O. Roy. Preference Logic, Conditionals, and Solution Concepts in Games. In H. Lagerlund, S. Lindström, and R. Sliwinski, editors, Modality Matters, pp. 61--76. University of Uppsala, 2006.
|
| |
25
|
|
|