ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Caching schemes for DCOP search algorithms
Full text PdfPdf (280 KB)
Source
International Conference on Autonomous Agents archive
Proceedings of The 8th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems - Volume 1 table of contents
Budapest, Hungary
SESSION: Coordination/DCOP/resource allocation table of contents
Pages 609-616  
Year of Publication: 2009
ISBN:978-0-9817381-6-1
Authors
William Yeoh  Computer Science, USC, Los Angeles, CA
Pradeep Varakantham  Robotics Institute, CMU, Pittsburgh, PA
Sven Koenig  Computer Science, USC, Los Angeles, CA
Sponsors
: The Foundation for Intelligent Physical Agents
Microsoft Research : Microsoft Research
: Wiley - Blackwell Ltd
: Whitestein Technologies
: European Office of Aerospace Research and Development, Air Force Office of Scientific Research, United States Air Force Research Laboratory
: Drexel University
Publisher
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 11,   Downloads (12 Months): 31,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  

ABSTRACT

Distributed Constraint Optimization (DCOP) is useful for solving agent-coordination problems. Any-space DCOP search algorithms require only a small amount of memory but can be sped up by caching information. However, their current caching schemes do not exploit the cached information when deciding which information to preempt from the cache when a new piece of information needs to be cached. Our contributions are three-fold: (1) We frame the problem as an optimization problem. (2) We introduce three new caching schemes (MaxPriority, MaxEffort and MaxUtility) that exploit the cached information in a DCOP-specific way. (3) We evaluate how the resulting speed up depends on the search strategy of the DCOP search algorithm. Our experimental results show that, on all tested DCOP problem classes, our MaxEffort and MaxUtility schemes speed up ADOPT (which uses best-first search) more than the other tested caching schemes, while our MaxPriority scheme speeds up BnB-ADOPT (which uses depth-first branch-and-bound search) at least as much as the other tested caching schemes.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
A. Chechetka and K. Sycara. An any-space algorithm for distributed constraint optimization. In Proceedings of the AAAI Spring Symposium on Distributed Plan and Schedule Management, pages 33--40, 2006.
2
 
3
 
4
P. Hart, N. Nilsson, and B. Raphael. A formal basis for the heuristic determination of minimum cost paths. IEEE Transactions on Systems Science and Cybernetics, SSC4(2):100--107, 1968.
 
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
R. Marinescu and R. Dechter. AND/OR branch-and-bound for graphical models. In Proceedings of IJCAI, pages 224--229, 2005.
 
10
T. Matsui, H. Matsuo, and A. Iwata. Efficient methods for asynchronous distributed constraint optimization algorithm. In Proceedings of Artificial Intelligence and Applications, pages 727--732, 2005.
 
11
 
12
A. Petcu and B. Faltings. A scalable method for multiagent constraint optimization. In Proceedings of IJCAI, pages 1413--1420, 2005.
 
13
A. Petcu and B. Faltings. MB-DPOP: A new memory-bounded algorithm for distributed optimization. In Proceedings of IJCAI, pages 1452--1457, 2007.
 
14

Collaborative Colleagues:
William Yeoh: colleagues
Pradeep Varakantham: colleagues
Sven Koenig: colleagues