| Decentralised coordination of continuously valued control parameters using the max-sum algorithm |
| Full text |
Pdf
(279 KB)
|
Source
|
International Conference on Autonomous Agents
archive
Proceedings of The 8th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems - Volume 1
table of contents
Budapest, Hungary
SESSION: Coordination/DCOP/resource allocation
table of contents
Pages 601-608
Year of Publication: 2009
ISBN:978-0-9817381-6-1
|
|
Authors
|
|
R. Stranders
|
School of Electronics and Computer Science, Southampton, UK
|
|
A. Farinelli
|
School of Electronics and Computer Science, Southampton, UK
|
|
A. Rogers
|
School of Electronics and Computer Science, Southampton, UK
|
|
N. R. Jennings
|
School of Electronics and Computer Science, Southampton, UK
|
|
| Sponsors |
|
| Publisher |
|
| Bibliometrics |
Downloads (6 Weeks): 8, Downloads (12 Months): 30, Citation Count: 0
|
|
|
ABSTRACT
In this paper we address the problem of decentralised coordination for agents that must make coordinated decisions over continuously valued control parameters (as is required in many real world applications). In particular, we tackle the social welfare maximisation problem, and derive a novel continuous version of the max-sum algorithm. In order to do so, we represent the utility function of the agents by multivariate piecewise linear functions, which in turn are encoded as simplexes. We then derive analytical solutions for the fundamental operations required to implement the max-sum algorithm (specifically, addition and marginal maximisation of general n-ary piecewise linear functions). We empirically evaluate our approach on a simulated network of wireless, energy constrained sensors that must coordinate their sense/sleep cycles in order to maximise the system-wide probability of event detection. We compare the conventional discrete max-sum algorithm with our novel continuous version, and show that the continuous approach obtains more accurate solutions (up to a 10% increase) with a lower communication overhead (up to half of the total message size).
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
| |
1
|
S. M. Aji and R. J. McEliece. The generalized distributive law. Information Theory, IEEE Transactions on, 46(2):325--343, 2000.
|
| |
2
|
|
| |
3
|
S. Fitzpatrick and L. Meertens. Distributed Sensor Networks A multiagent perspective, chapter Distributed Coordination through Anarchic Optimization, pages 257--293. Kluwer Academic, 2003.
|
| |
4
|
B. J. Frey and D. Dueck. Clustering by passing messages between data points. Science, 315(5814):972--976, 2007.
|
| |
5
|
B. Grocholsky, J. Keller, V. Kumar, and G. Pappas. Cooperative air and ground surveillance. IEEE Robotics&Automation Magazine, 13(3):16--25, 2006.
|
| |
6
|
|
 |
7
|
|
 |
8
|
|
| |
9
|
F. R. Kschischang, B. J. Frey, and H. A. Loeliger. Factor graphs and the sum-product algorithm. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 42(2):498--519, 2001.
|
| |
10
|
|
| |
11
|
R. J. Maheswaran, J. Pearce, and M. Tambe. A family of graphical-game-based algorithms for distributed constraint optimization problems. In Coordination of Large-Scale Multiagent Systems, pages 127--146. Springer-Verlag, 2005.
|
| |
12
|
|
| |
13
|
|
| |
14
|
|
| |
15
|
A. Petcu and B. Faltings. DPOP: A scalable method for multiagent constraint optimization. In Proc. of the 19th Int. Joint Conf. on Artificial Intelligence, pages 266--271, 2005.
|
| |
16
|
Y. Weiss and W. T. Freeman. On the optimality of solutions of the max-product belief propagation algorithm in arbitrary graphs. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 47(2):723--735, 2001.
|
|