ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Hedonic coalition nets
Full text PdfPdf (257 KB)
Source
International Conference on Autonomous Agents archive
Proceedings of The 8th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems - Volume 1 table of contents
Budapest, Hungary
SESSION: Coalitions table of contents
Pages 417-424  
Year of Publication: 2009
ISBN:978-0-9817381-6-1
Authors
Edith Elkind  Nanyang Technological University, Singapore and University of Southampton, United Kingdom
Michael Wooldridge  University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
Sponsors
: The Foundation for Intelligent Physical Agents
Microsoft Research : Microsoft Research
: Wiley - Blackwell Ltd
: Whitestein Technologies
: European Office of Aerospace Research and Development, Air Force Office of Scientific Research, United States Air Force Research Laboratory
: Drexel University
Publisher
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 11,   Downloads (12 Months): 33,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  

ABSTRACT

In hedonic games, players have the opportunity to form coalitions, and have preferences over the coalitions they might join. Such games can be used to model a variety of settings ranging from multi-agent coordination to group formation in social networks. However, the practical application of hedonic games is hindered by the fact that the naive representation for such games is exponential in the number of players. In this paper, we study hedonic coalition nets---a succinct, rule-based representation for hedonic games. This formalism is based on marginal contribution nets, which were developed by Ieong and Shoham for representing coalitional games with transferable utility. We show that hedonic coalition nets are universally expressive, yet are at least as succinct as other existing representation schemes for hedonic games. We then investigate the complexity of many natural decision problems for hedonic coalition nets. In particular, we provide a complete characterisation of the computational difficulty of problems related to coalitional stability for hedonic games represented with hedonic nets.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
C. Ballester. NP-completeness in hedonic games. Games and Econ. Beh., 49:1--30, 2004.
 
2
S. Banerjee, H. Konishi, T. Sönmez. Core in a simple coalition formation game. Social Choice and Welfare, 18:135--153, 2001.
 
3
 
4
A. Bogomolnaia and M. O. Jackson. The stability of hedonic coalition structures. Games and Econ. Beh., 38:201--230, 2002.
 
5
K. Cechlarova and J. Hajdukova. Computational complexity of stable partitions with B-preferences. Int. Jnl of Game Th., 31(3):353--364, 2002.
 
6
 
7
 
8
D. Dimitrov, P. Borm, R. Hendrickx, and S. Sung. Simple priorities and core stability in hedonic games. Social Choice and Welfare, 26(2):421--433, 2006.
 
9
 
10
 
11
M. R. Garey and D. S. Johnson. Computers and Intractability. W. H. Freeman, 1979.
12
 
13
E. Malizia, L. Palopoli, and F. Scarcello. Infeasibility certificates and the complexity of the core in coalitional games. In Proc. IJCAI-07, 2007.
 
14
 
15
S. C. Sung and D. Dimitrov. On core membership testing for hedonic coalition formation games. Oper. Res. Letters, 35:155--158, 2007.

Collaborative Colleagues:
Edith Elkind: colleagues
Michael Wooldridge: colleagues