Investigating the benefits of automated negotiations in enhancing people's negotiation skills

Subscribe (Full Service)


	Search: The ACM Digital Library The Guide

	Feedback

Investigating the benefits of automated negotiations in enhancing people's negotiation skills

Full text

Pdf (271 KB)

Source

International Conference on Autonomous Agents archive
Proceedings of The 8th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems - Volume 1 table of contents

Budapest, Hungary

SESSION: Virtual agents/agent-human interaction table of contents

Pages 345-352

Year of Publication: 2009

ISBN:978-0-9817381-6-1

Authors

Raz Lin	Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan, Israel
Yinon Oshrat	Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan, Israel
Sarit Kraus	Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan, Israel and University of Maryland, College Park, MD

Sponsors

: The Foundation for Intelligent Physical Agents
Microsoft Research : Microsoft Research
: Wiley - Blackwell Ltd
: Whitestein Technologies
: European Office of Aerospace Research and Development, Air Force Office of Scientific Research, United States Air Force Research Laboratory
: Drexel University

Publisher

International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems Richland, SC

Bibliometrics

Downloads (6 Weeks): 12, Downloads (12 Months): 31, Citation Count: 0

Additional Information:

abstract references index terms collaborative colleagues

Tools and Actions:	Review this Article Save this Article to a Binder Display Formats: BibTeX EndNote ACM Ref

ABSTRACT

Negotiation surrounds our day-to-day lives. Research in the field of automated negotiations has suggested the design and use of automated negotiators, on one hand to allow facilitation of the negotiation process by human negotiators and, on the other hand to provide automated agents that can negotiate on behalf of humans. Many papers present innovative agents and evaluate their efficacy in negotiations with other automated agents or people. Others focus on building negotiation support systems with the purpose of helping negotiators reach an agreement. Yet, the question still remains whether these systems or agents have the potential of improving people's negotiation skills. In this paper we attempt to shed more light on this topic. By means of extensive simulations with human negotiators we examine and compare several training methods and their implications on the improvement of negotiation skills of human negotiators.

REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

	1	S. R. Brown and L. E. Melamed. Experimental Design and Analysis. Sage Publications, Inc., CA, USA, 1990.
	2	Andrew Byde , Mike Yearworth , Kay-Yut Chen , Claudio Bartolini , Nir Vulkan, AutONA: a system for automated multiple 1-1 negotiation, Proceedings of the 4th ACM conference on Electronic commerce, June 09-12, 2003, San Diego, CA, USA [doi>10.1145/779928.779957]
	3	Daniel Druckman , Noam Ebner, Onstage or behind the scenes? Relative learning benefits of simulation role-play and design, Simulation and Gaming, v.39 n.4, p.465-497, December 2008 [doi>10.1177/1046878107311377]
	4	Sevan G. Ficici , Avi Pfeffer, Modeling how humans reason about others with partial information, Proceedings of the 7th international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems, May 12-16, 2008, Estoril, Portugal
	5	Catholijn M. Jonker , Valentin Robu , Jan Treur, An agent architecture for multi-attribute negotiation using incomplete preference information, Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, v.15 n.2, p.221-252, October 2007 [doi>10.1007/s10458-006-9009-y]
	6	P. Kenny, A. Hartholt, J. Gratch, W. Swartout, D. Traum, S. Marsella, and D. Piepol. Building interactive virtual humans for training environments. In Proceedings of Interservice/Industry Training, Simulation and Education Conference (I/ITSEC), 2007.
	7	Gregory E. Kersten , Sunil J. Noronha, WWW-based negotiation support: design, implementation, and use, Decision Support Systems, v.25 n.2, p.135-154, Mar. 1999 [doi>10.1016/S0167-9236(99)00012-3]
	8	Sarit Kraus , Penina Hoz-Weiss , Jonathan Wilkenfeld , David R. Andersen , Amy Pate, Resolving crises through automated bilateral negotiations, Artificial Intelligence, v.172 n.1, p.1-18, January, 2008 [doi>10.1016/j.artint.2007.05.007]
	9	Raz Lin , Sarit Kraus , Jonathan Wilkenfeld , James Barry, Negotiating with bounded rational agents in environments with incomplete information using an automated agent, Artificial Intelligence, v.172 n.6-7, p.823-851, April, 2008 [doi>10.1016/j.artint.2007.09.007]
	10	M. J. Osborne and A. Rubinstein. A Course In Game Theory. MIT Press, Cambridge MA, 1994.
	11	S. Siegel. Non-Parametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences. McGraw-Hill, NY, USA, 1956.
	12	Brigid A. Starkey , Elizabeth L. Blake, Simulation in international relations education, Simulation and Gaming, v.32 n.4, p.537-551, December 2001 [doi>10.1177/104687810103200409]
	13	L. E. Susskind and J. Corburn. Using simulations to teach negotiation: Pedagogical theory and practice. Working Paper 99--1, Program on Negotiation at Harvard Law School, 1999.
	14	E. M. Thiessen, D. P. Loucks, and J. R. Stedinger. Computer-assisted negotiations of water resources conflicts. GDN, 7(2):109--129, 1998.
	15	David Traum , Stacy C. Marsella , Jonathan Gratch , Jina Lee , Arno Hartholt, Multi-party, Multi-issue, Multi-strategy Negotiation for Multi-modal Virtual Agents, Proceedings of the 8th international conference on Intelligent Virtual Agents, September 01-03, 2008, Tokyo, Japan [doi>10.1007/978-3-540-85483-8_12]
	16	M. Wand and M. Jones. Kernel Smoothing. Chapman&Hall, London, 1995.
	17	William H. Ross, Jr. , william Pollman , Dana Perry , John Welty , Keith Jones, Interactive video negotiator training: a preliminary evaluation of the McGill negotiation simulator, Simulation and Gaming, v.32 n.4, p.451-468, December 2001 [doi>10.1177/104687810103200402]