ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Unifying preference and judgment aggregation
Full text PdfPdf (269 KB)
Source
International Conference on Autonomous Agents archive
Proceedings of The 8th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems - Volume 1 table of contents
Budapest, Hungary
SESSION: Economic approaches/auctions/mechanism design table of contents
Pages 217-224  
Year of Publication: 2009
ISBN:978-0-9817381-6-1
Author
Davide Grossi  University of Amsterdam, TV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Sponsors
: The Foundation for Intelligent Physical Agents
Microsoft Research : Microsoft Research
: Wiley - Blackwell Ltd
: Whitestein Technologies
: European Office of Aerospace Research and Development, Air Force Office of Scientific Research, United States Air Force Research Laboratory
: Drexel University
Publisher
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 11,   Downloads (12 Months): 34,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  

ABSTRACT

The paper proposes a unification of the two main frameworks commonly used for the analysis of collective decision-making: the framework of preference aggregation, developed from the seminal work of K. Arrow on social choice theory; and the more recent framework of judgment aggregation. Such unification provides several original insights on collective decision-making problems. The methods used are based on logic and, in particular, on formal semantics.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
K. Arrow. Social Choice and Individual Values. John Wiley, New York, 2nd edition, 1963.
 
2
S. J. Brams and P. C. Fishburn. Approval voting. The American Political Science Review, 72(3):831--847, 1978.
 
3
 
4
G. Debreu. Representation of a preference ordering by a numerical function. In R. M. Thrall, C. H. Coombs, and R. L. Davis, editors, Decision Processes. John Wiley, 1954.
 
5
F. Dietrich and C. List. Arrow's theorem in judgment aggregation. Social Choice and Welfare, 29(19--33), 2007.
 
6
M. Dummett. A propositional calculus with denumerable matrix. Journal of Symbolic Logic, 24(2):97--106, 1959.
 
7
W. Gaertner. A Primer in Social Choice Theory. Oxford University Press, 2006.
 
8
R. Hähnle. Advanced many-valued logics. In D. M. Gabbay and F. Guenther, editors, Handbook of Philosophical Logic, 2nd Edition, volume 2, pages 297--395. Kluwer, 2001.
 
9
P. Hájek. Making fuzzy description logics more general. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 154(1):1--15, 2005.
 
10
A. Horn. Logic with truth values in a linearly ordered Heyting algebra. Journal of Symbolic Logic, 34(3):395--408, 1969.
 
11
C. List and P. Pettit. Aggregating sets of judgments: Two impossibility results compared. Synthese, 140:207--235, 2004.
 
12
C. List and C. Puppe. Judgment aggregation: A survey. In Oxford Handbook of Rational and Social Choice. Oxford University Press, 2009.
 
13
A. K. Sen. The impossibility of a Paretian liberal. The Journal of Political Economy, 78:152--157, 1970.