|
ABSTRACT
While there has been much work on developing frameworks and models of norms and normative systems, consideration of the impact of norms on the practical reasoning of agents has attracted less attention. The problem is that traditional agent architectures and their associated languages provide no mechanism to adapt an agent at runtime to norms constraining their behaviour. This is important because if BDI-type agents are to operate in open environments, they need to adapt to changes in the norms that regulate such environments. In response, in this paper we provide a technique to extend BDI agent languages, by enabling them to enact behaviour modification at runtime in response to newly accepted norms. Our solution consists of creating new plans to comply with obligations and suppressing the execution of existing plans that violate prohibitions. We demonstrate the viability of our approach through an implementation of our solution in the AgentSpeak(L) language.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
 |
1
|
Huib Aldewereld , Frank Dignum , Andrés García-Camino , Pablo Noriega , Juan Antonio Rodríguez-Aguilar , Carles Sierra, Operationalisation of norms for usage in electronic institutions, Proceedings of the fifth international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems, May 08-12, 2006, Hakodate, Japan
[doi> 10.1145/1160633.1160669]
|
| |
2
|
|
| |
3
|
|
| |
4
|
Noura Faci , Sanjay Modgil , Nir Oren , Felipe Meneguzzi , Simon Miles , Michael Luck, Towards a Monitoring Framework for Agent-Based Contract Systems, Proceedings of the 12th international workshop on Cooperative Information Agents XII, September 10-12, 2008, Prague, Czech Republic
[doi> 10.1007/978-3-540-85834-8_23]
|
| |
5
|
A. J. I. Jones and I. Pörn. 'ought' and 'must'. Synthese, 66(1):89--93, 1986.
|
| |
6
|
M. J. Kollingbaum and T. J. Norman. Norm adoption and consistency in the NoA agent architecture. In PROMAS 2003, volume 3067 of LNCS, pages 169--186. Springer, 2003.
|
| |
7
|
A. Lomuscio and M. Sergot. Deontic interpreted systems. Studia Logica, 75(1):63--92, 2003.
|
| |
8
|
F. Lopez y Lopez, M. Luck, and M. d'Inverno. A normative framework for agent-based systems. In Proc. 1st Int. Symp. on Normative Multi-Agent Systems, 2005.
|
| |
9
|
Felipe Meneguzzi , Michael Luck, Leveraging New Plans in AgentSpeak(PL), Declarative Agent Languages and Technologies VI: 6th International Workshop, DALT 2008, Estoril, Portugal, May 12, 2008, Revised Selected and Invited Papers, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2008
[doi> 10.1007/978-3-540-93920-7_8]
|
| |
10
|
N. Oren, M. Luck, and T. J. Norman. Argumentation for normative reasoning. In Proc. Symp. Behaviour Regulation in Multi-Agent Systems, pages 55--60, 2008.
|
| |
11
|
N. Oren, S. Panagiotidi, J. Vazquez-Salceda, S. Modgil, M. Luck, and S. Miles. Towards a formalisation of electronic contracting environments. In Proc. 12th COIN Workshop, pages 61--68, 2008.
|
| |
12
|
I. Pörn. Logic of Power. Blackwell Publishers, 1970.
|
| |
13
|
|
 |
14
|
|
| |
15
|
J. Vázquez-Salceda, H. Aldewereld, and F. Dignum. Norms in multiagent systems: from theory to practice. Computer Systems: Science&Engineering, 20(4), 2005.
|
| |
16
|
R. Vieira, Á. F. Moreira, M. Wooldridge, and R. H. Bordini. On the formal semantics of speech-act based communication in an agent-oriented programming language. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 29:221--267, 2007.
|
|