ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Context-aware multi-stage routing
Full text PdfPdf (304 KB)
Source
International Conference on Autonomous Agents archive
Proceedings of The 8th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems - Volume 1 table of contents
Budapest, Hungary
SESSION: Multi-robotics table of contents
Pages 49-56  
Year of Publication: 2009
ISBN:978-0-9817381-6-1
Authors
Adriaan ter Mors  Almende BV, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
Jeroen van Belle  Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands
Cees Witteveen  Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands
Sponsors
: The Foundation for Intelligent Physical Agents
Microsoft Research : Microsoft Research
: Wiley - Blackwell Ltd
: Whitestein Technologies
: European Office of Aerospace Research and Development, Air Force Office of Scientific Research, United States Air Force Research Laboratory
: Drexel University
Publisher
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 14,   Downloads (12 Months): 32,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  

ABSTRACT

In context-aware route planning, a set of agents has to plan routes on a common infrastructure and each agent has to plan a conflict-free route from a source to a destination without invalidating plans made by other agents. The existence of such a conflict-free set of plans can be ensured if each agent is allowed to reserve time slots on the infrastructure resources it intends to use.

In the multi-stage variant of the context-aware routing problem, each agent has a sequence of destination locations it must visit. A naive approach to solve the multi-stage variant is to make context-aware route plans between every two subsequent locations in the sequence, and then to concatenate these plans together. It can easily be shown, however, that this concatenation approach cannot guarantee that a multi-stage plan (if it exists) can always be found, and even if it is found, then it need not be optimal. Therefore, we present a new polynomial-time algorithm for the multi-stage routing problem that always returns the optimal (shortest-time) route for a single agent, given a set of reservations made by previous agents, thus providing a set of Pareto-optimal route plans.

Obviously, the need for such a dedicated multi-stage routing algorithm depends on the frequency with which the concatenation approach fails to find a plan, or finds a rather inefficient one. Our experiments show that, given a set of reservations from 200 agents, the concatenation approach fails to find a solution in more than 50% of the cases, for random visiting sequences of six locations or more. However, if the concatenation approach does find a solution, its plan quality is often close to that of an optimal solution.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
 
2
G. Bruno, G. Ghiani, and G. Improta. Dynamic positioning of idle automated guided vehicles. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 11(2):209--215, April 2000.
3
 
4
P. E. Hart, N. Nilsson, and B. Raphael. A formal basis for the heuristic determination of minimum cost paths. IEEE Transactions on Systems Science and Cybernetics SSC4, 4(2):100--107, 1968.
 
5
W. Hatzack and B. Nebel. The operational traffic problem: Computational complexity and solutions. In A. Cesta, editor, Proceedings of the 6<sup>th</sup> European Conference on Planning (ECP'01), pages 49--60, 2001.
 
6
C. W. Kim and J. Tanchoco. Conflict-free shortest-time bidirectional AGV routeing. International Journal of Production Research, 29(1):2377--2391, 1991.
 
7
Y. Kim, T. Suzuki, and T. Narikiyo. Fms scheduling based on timed petri net model and reactive graph search. Applied mathematical modelling, 31(6):955--970, 2007.
 
8
J. Lin and P.-K. Dgen. An algorithm for routeing control of a tandem automated guided vehicle system. International Journal of Production Research, 32(12):2735--2750, December 1994.
 
9
 
10
 
11
 
12
F. Taghaboni-Dutta and J. Tanchoco. Comparison of dynamic routing techniques for automated guided vehicle system. International Journal of Production Research, 33(10):2653--2669, 1995.
 
13
 
14
A. W. ter Mors, J. Zutt, and C. Witteveen. Context-aware logistic routing and scheduling. In Proceedings of the Seventeenth International Conference on Automated Planning and Scheduling, pages 328--335, 2007.
 
15
I. F. Vis. Survey of research in the design and control of automated guided vehicle systems. European Journal of Operational Research, 170(3):677--709, May 2006.

Collaborative Colleagues:
Adriaan ter Mors: colleagues
Jeroen van Belle: colleagues
Cees Witteveen: colleagues