ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Social recommender systems for web 2.0 folksonomies
Full text PdfPdf (412 KB)
Source
Conference on Hypertext and Hypermedia archive
Proceedings of the 20th ACM conference on Hypertext and hypermedia table of contents
Torino, Italy
SESSION: Recommendation and clustering table of contents
Pages 261-270  
Year of Publication: 2009
ISBN:978-1-60558-486-7
Authors
Stefan Siersdorfer  University of Hannover, Hannover, Germany
Sergej Sizov  University of Koblenz, Koblenz, Germany
Sponsors
SIGWEB: ACM Special Interest Group on Hypertext, Hypermedia, and Web
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 61,   Downloads (12 Months): 180,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1557914.1557959
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

The rapidly increasing popularity of Web 2.0 knowledge and content sharing systems and growing amount of shared data make discovering relevant content and finding contacts a difficult enterprize. Typically, folksonomies provide a rich set of structures and social relationships that can be mined for a variety of recommendation purposes. In this paper we propose a formal model to characterize users, items, and annotations in Web 2.0 environments. Our objective is to construct social recommender systems that predict the utility of items, users, or groups based on the multi-dimensional social environment of a given user. Based on this model we introduce recommendation mechanisms for content sharing frameworks. Our comprehensive evaluation shows the viability of our approach and emphasizes the key role of social meta knowledge for constructing effective recommendations in Web 2.0 applications.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
R. Albert and A. Barabasi. Statistical mechanics of complex networks. Review of Modern Physics, 74:47--97, 2001.
 
3
 
4
 
5
K. Crammer and Y. Singer. Pranking with ranking. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 14(1):641--647, 2002.
 
6
S. Deerwester, S. Dumais, T. Landauer, G. Furnas, and R. Harshman. Indexing by latent semantic analysis. Journal of the American Society of Information Science, 41(6):391 --U407, 1990.
7
8
 
9
 
10
T. Hammond, T. Hannay, B. Lund, and J. Scott. Social Bookmarking Tools (I): A General Review. D-Lib Magazine, 11(4), April 2005.
11
12
 
13
A. Hotho, R. JÄaschke, C. Schmitz, and G. Stumme. Information Retrieval in Folksonomies: Search and Ranking. In The Semantic Web: Research and Applications, volume 4011 of LNAI, pages 411--426, Heidelberg, 2006. Springer.
 
14
J. Kleinberg. Temporal dynamics of on-line information streams. In M. Garofalakis, J. Gehrke, and R. Rastogi, editors, Data Stream Management: Processing High-Speed Data Streams. Springer, 2006.
 
15
J. A. Konstan, J. Riedl, A. Borchers, and J. Herlocker. Recommender systems: A grouplens perspective. In Recommender Systems: Papers from the 1998 Workshop (AAAI Technical Report WS-98-08), pages 60--64. AAAI Press, 1998.
 
16
R. Lambiotte and M. Ausloos. Collaborative tagging as a tripartite network. ArXiv Computer Science e-prints, Dec. 2005.
 
17
 
18
B. Lund, T. Hammond, M. Flack, and T. Hannay. Social Bookmarking Tools (II): A Case Study - Connotea. D-Lib Magazine, 11(4), 2005.
19
 
20
P. Mika. Ontologies are us: A unified model of social networks and semantics. 4th International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC), Galway, Ireland, pages 522--536, 2005.
 
21
M. E. J. Newman. The structure and function of complex networks. SIAM Review, 45:167, 2003.
 
22
K. Nigam, J. Lafferty, and A. McCallum. Using maximum entropy for text classification. Workshop on Machine Learning for Information Filtering, IJCAI'99, pages 61--67, 1999.
 
23
24
 
25
C. Schmitz, A. Hotho, R. Jaeschke, and G. Stumme. Mining Association Rules in Folksonomies. pages 261--270, 2006.
 
26
G. Stumme. A finite state model for on-line analytical processing in triadic contexts. In ICFCA, pages 315--328, 2005.
27
 
28
 
29
V. Vapnik. Statistical Learning Theory. Wiley, New York, 1998.
 
30
R. Wille. Restructuring lattice theory: An approach based on hierarchies of concepts. In I. Rival, editor, Ordered Sets, pages 445--470. Reidel, Dordrecht-Boston, 1982.

Collaborative Colleagues:
Stefan Siersdorfer: colleagues
Sergej Sizov: colleagues