ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Contextualising tags in collaborative tagging systems
Full text PdfPdf (609 KB)
Source
Conference on Hypertext and Hypermedia archive
Proceedings of the 20th ACM conference on Hypertext and hypermedia table of contents
Torino, Italy
SESSION: Recommendation and clustering table of contents
Pages 251-260  
Year of Publication: 2009
ISBN:978-1-60558-486-7
Authors
Ching-man Au Yeung  University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
Nicholas Gibbins  University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
Nigel Shadbolt  University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
Sponsors
SIGWEB: ACM Special Interest Group on Hypertext, Hypermedia, and Web
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 44,   Downloads (12 Months): 138,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1557914.1557958
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Collaborative tagging systems are now popular tools for organising and sharing information on the Web. While collaborative tagging offers many advantages over the use of controlled vocabularies, they also suffer from problems such as the existence of polysemous tags. We investigate how the different contexts in which individual tags are used can be revealed automatically without consulting any external resources. We consider several different network representations of tags and documents, and apply a graph clustering algorithm on these networks to obtain groups of tags or documents corresponding to the different meanings of an ambiguous tag. Our experiments show that networks which explicitly take the social context into account are more likely to give a better picture of the semantics of a tag.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
M. Adam. Folksonomies -- cooperative classification and communication through shared metadata. http://www.adammathes.com/academic/computer-mediated-communication/folksonomies.html, 2004.
 
2
C. M. Au Yeung, N. Gibbins, and N. Shadbolt. Understanding the semantics of ambiguous tags in folksonomies. In the International Workshop on Emergent Semantics and Ontology Evolution (ESOE2007) at ISWC/ASWC 2007, November 2007.
 
3
 
4
C. M. Au Yeung, N. Gibbins, and N. Shadbolt. A study of user profile generation from folksonomies. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Social Web and Knowledge Management at WWW2008, 2008.
 
5
S. Auer, C. Bizer, G. Kobilarov, J. Lehmann, R. Cyganiak, and Z. Ives. Dbpedia: A nucleus for a web of open data. In Proceedings of the 6thInternational Semantic Web Conference (ISWC), volume 4825 of LNCS, pages 722--735. Springer, 2008.
 
6
G. Begelman, P. Keller, and F. Smadja. Automated tag clustering: Improving search and exploration in the tag space. In Collaborative Web Tagging Workshop at WWW2006, Edinburgh, Scotland, 2006.
7
 
8
C. Cattuto, A. Baldassarri, V. D. P. Servedio, and V. Loreto. Emergent community structure in social tagging systems. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Complex Systems, Dresden, Germany, October 2007.
 
9
C. Cattuto, D. Benz, A. Hotho, and G. Stumme. Semantic analysis of tag similarity measures in collaborative tagging systems. In Proceedings of the 3rd Workshop on Ontology Learning and Population (OLP3), Patras, Greece, July 2008.
 
10
11
 
12
S. C. Deerwester, S. T. Dumais, T. K. Landauer, G. W. Furnas, and R. A. Harshman. Indexing by latent semantic analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 41(6):391--407, 1990.
 
13
 
14
15
 
16
R. Lambiotte and M. Ausloos. Collaborative tagging as a tripartite network. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Computational Science, page 1114--1117. Springer-Verlag, 2006.
 
17
18
 
19
20
 
21
M. E. J. Newman. Analysis of weighted networks. Physical Review E, 70:056131, 2004.
 
22
M. E. J. Newman. Mathematics of networks. In The New Palgrave Encyclopedia of Economics, 2nd edition. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, 2007.
 
23
M. E. J. Newman and M. Girvan. Finding and evaluating community structure in networks. Physical Review E, 69:026113, 2004.
 
24
S. Niwa, T. Doi, and S. Honiden. Folksonomy tag organization method based on the tripartite graph analysis. In IJCAI Workshop on Semantic Web for Collaborative Knowledge Acquisition, January 2007.
25
 
26
E. Quintarelli. Folksonomies: power to the people. ISKO Italy-UniMIB meeting, June 2005.
 
27
F. Radicchi, C. Castellano, F. Cecconi, V. Loreto, and D. Parisi. Defining and identifying communities in networks. Proc. of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 101:2658, 2004.
 
28
 
29
 
30
K. Shen and L. Wu. Folksonomy as a complex network. The Computing Research Repository, September 2005.
 
31
D. W. J. Stefanowski. Carrot2 and language properties in web search results clustering. In Proceedings of the International Atlantic Web Intelligence Conference, 2003.
32
33
 
34
35
 
36
 
37
M. Zhou, S. Bao, X. Wu, and Y. Yu. An unsupervised model for exploring hierarchical semantics from social annotations. In The Semantic Web, 6th International Semantic Web Conference, 2nd Asian Semantic Web Conference, ISWC 2007 + ASWC 2007, volume 4825 of LNCS, pages 680--693. Springer, 2007.

Collaborative Colleagues:
Ching-man Au Yeung: colleagues
Nicholas Gibbins: colleagues
Nigel Shadbolt: colleagues