ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Scholarly research process: investigating the effects of link type and directionality
Full text PdfPdf (775 KB)
Source
Conference on Hypertext and Hypermedia archive
Proceedings of the 20th ACM conference on Hypertext and hypermedia table of contents
Torino, Italy
SESSION: Link analysis table of contents
Pages 99-108  
Year of Publication: 2009
ISBN:978-1-60558-486-7
Authors
Mark Leslie Alford  The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
Emilia Mendes  The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
Sponsors
SIGWEB: ACM Special Interest Group on Hypertext, Hypermedia, and Web
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 18,   Downloads (12 Months): 55,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1557914.1557934
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Hypertext research has discovered new ways to explore, represent and visualise data and has led to many improvements in the usability and usefulness of systems. However, in the field of scholarly writing research, several studies discuss the need for improving the current state of affairs [18][24][29]. This research aimed to investigate whether typed and/or bi-directional links have an effect on users' performance and confidence when undertaking a literature survey [18], considered one of the phases of a scholarly writing process [29]. Two empirical studies were conducted - a survey and a formal experiment, and results showed that both typed and bi-directional links had significant effect on users' performance and confidence when undertaking common early scholarly writing tasks, specifically benefiting tasks relating to surveying existing literature.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
2
 
3
4
5
 
6
Borgman, C. L., and Furner, J. 2002. Scholarly communication and bibliometrics, Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 36.
7
8
9
 
10
11
 
12
Dillon, A., Richardson, J., and McKnight, C. 1989. The human factors of journal usage and the design of electronic text, Interacting with Computers, 1(2), pp. 183--189.
13
14
15
16
 
17
Kampa, S. R. 2002. Who are the experts? e-scholars in the semantic Web, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Southampton.
 
18
 
19
20
21
 
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
 
29
30
31
32
33
34
 
35
 
36
Stix, V., and Uren, V. S. 2003. Semantic structuring of concepts found in scholarly literature: An empirical study using a fuzzy clustering approach, In Proceedings SCI'03.
37
38
39
40
 
41
Yee, K., 1998. CritLink: Better Hyperlinks for the WWW. In Proceedings of Hypertext'98, pp. 20--24, 1998.

Collaborative Colleagues:
Mark Leslie Alford: colleagues
Emilia Mendes: colleagues