COA: finding novel patents through text analysis

ABSTRACT

In recent years, the number of patents filed by the business enterprises in the technology industry are growing rapidly, thus providing unprecedented opportunities for knowledge discovery in patent data. One important task in this regard is to employ data mining techniques to rank patents in terms of their potential to earn money through licensing. Availability of such ranking can substantially reduce enterprise IP (Intellectual Property) management costs. Unfortunately, the existing software systems in the IP domain do not address this task directly. Through our research, we build a patent ranking software, named COA (Claim Originality Analysis) that rates a patent based on its value by measuring the recency and the impact of the important phrases that appear in the "claims" section of a patent. Experiments show that COA produces meaningful ranking when comparing it with other indirect patent evaluation metrics--citation count, patent status, and attorney's rating. In reallife settings, this tool was used by beta-testers in the IBM IP department. Lawyers found it very useful in patent rating, specifically, in highlighting potentially valuable patents in a patent cluster. In this article, we describe the ranking techniques and system architecture of COA. We also present the results that validate its effectiveness.

REFERENCES

• 1: J. Bessen, An Empirical Look at Software Patents, J. of Econ.&Management Strategy (2007), 16(1): 157--189
• 2: www.almaden.ibm.com/asr/projects/biw/
• 3: www.delphion.com
• 4: http://www.freepatentsonline.com
• 5: D. Harhoff, F. Narin, F. Scherer, and K. Vopel, Citation Frequency and the Value of Patented Inventions, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 81(3):511--515
• 6: www.ibm.com/ibm/licensing/patents/portfolio.shtml
• 7: A. B. Jaffe, and J. Lerner, Innovation and its discontents: How our broken patent system is endangering innovation and progress, and what to do about it, Princeton University Press, 2004
• 8: Kas Kasravi , Maria Risov, Patent Mining - Discover y of Business Value from Patent Repositor ies, Proceedings of the 40th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, p.54, January 03-06, 2007 [doi>10.1109/HICSS.2007.427]
• 9: H.J Knight, Patent Strategy for Researchers and Research Managers, John Willey and Sons Ltd., 2001
• 10: Jon M. Kleinberg, Authoritative sources in a hyperlinked environment, Proceedings of the ninth annual ACM-SIAM symposium on Discrete algorithms, p.668-677, January 25-27, 1998, San Francisco, California, United States
• 11: J. O. Lanjouw, A. Pakes, and J. Putnam, How to count Patent and Value Intellectual Property: The Use of Patent Renewal and Application Data, The Journal of Industrial Economics, 46(4):405--432, 1998
• 12: J. O. Lanjouw, Economic Consequence of a Changing Litigation Environment: The case of Patents, National Bureau of Economic Research, W4835, 1994
• 13: http://lucene.apache.org/java/docs/
• 14: A. L. Miele, patent Strategy: The manager's guide to profiting from patent portfolios, Willey Intellectual Property Series, 2001
• 15: Mitchell P. Marcus , Mary Ann Marcinkiewicz , Beatrice Santorini, Building a large annotated corpus of English: the penn treebank, Computational Linguistics, v.19 n.2, June 1993
• 16: www.patentcafe.com
• 17: Sergey Brin , Lawrence Page, The anatomy of a large-scale hypertextual Web search engine, Proceedings of the seventh international conference on World Wide Web 7, p.107-117, April 1998, Brisbane, Australia
• 18: B. Shaparenko, R. Caruana, J. Gehrke, and T. Jocachims, Identifying Temporal Patterns and Key Players in Document Collection, In Proceedings of the IEEE ICDM Workshop on Temporal Data Mining, Houston, TX, 2005
• 19: Benyah Shaparenko , Thorsten Joachims, Information genealogy: uncovering the flow of ideas in non-hyperlinked document databases, Proceedings of the 13th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining, August 12-15, 2007, San Jose, California, USA [doi>10.1145/1281192.1281259]
• 20: S. Shulman, Software Patents Tangle the Web, Technology Review, 2000
• 21: http://lucene.apache.org/solr/
• 22: http://www.uspto.gov
• 23: USPTO Performance and Accountability Report, 2008
• 24: B. Wang, M. Chu, J. Shyu, Patent value Measurement by Analytic Hierarchy Process, IAMOT (2006), Beijing, China

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  H. Information Systems
  H.2 DATABASE MANAGEMENT
      H.2.8 Database applications
          Subjects: Data mining

General Terms:
Algorithms, Design

Keywords:
document ranking, information retrieval, patent processing, patent visualization