ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Learning, indexing, and diagnosing network faults
Full text MovMov (10:59),  PdfPdf (540 KB)
Source
International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining archive
Proceedings of the 15th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining table of contents
Paris, France
SESSION: Research track papers table of contents
Pages 857-866  
Year of Publication: 2009
ISBN:978-1-60558-495-9
Authors
Ting Wang  Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA
Mudhakar Srivatsa  IBM T.J. Watson Research Center, Hawthorne, NY, USA
Dakshi Agrawal  IBM T.J. Watson Research Center, Hawthorne, NY, USA
Ling Liu  Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGKDD: ACM Special Interest Group on Knowledge Discovery in Data
SIGMOD: ACM Special Interest Group on Management of Data
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 45,   Downloads (12 Months): 104,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1557019.1557113
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Modern communication networks generate massive volume of operational event data, e.g., alarm, alert, and metrics, which can be used by a network management system (NMS) to diagnose potential faults. In this work, we introduce a new class of indexable fault signatures that encode temporal evolution of events generated by a network fault as well as topological relationships among the nodes where these events occur. We present an efficient learning algorithm to extract such fault signatures from noisy historical event data, and with the help of novel space-time indexing structures, we show how to perform efficient, online signature matching. We provide results from extensive experimental studies to explore the efficacy of our approach and point out potential applications of such signatures for many different types of networks including social and information networks.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
 
2
 
3
]]H. Akaike. A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Trans. Auto. Cont., 19(6), 1974.
 
4
]]A.-L. Barabási. Linked: The New Science of Networks. Perseus Publishing, 2002.
 
5
6
 
7
]]A. Dempster, N. Laird, and D. Rubin. Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the em algorithm. J. Royal Stat. Soci. B, 39(1), 1977.
 
8
9
 
10
]]I. E. T. Force. OSPF version 2. http://www.ietf.org/rfc.
11
12
 
13
14
 
15
 
16
]]X. Meng, G. Jiang, H. Zhang, H. Chen, and K. Yoshihira. Automatic profiling of network event sequences: algorithm and application. In IEEE INFOCOM, 2008.
 
17
 
18
 
19
]]F. Salfner. Event-based failure prediction: an extended hidden markov model approach. Department of Computer Science, Humboldt-Universitat zu Berlin, Germany, 2008.
 
20
]]M. Steinder and A. Sethi. A survey of fault localization techniques in computer networks. Sci. Comput. Prog., 53, 2004.
 
21
]]P. Wu, R. Bhatnagar, L. Epshtein, M. Bhandaru, and S. Zhongwen. Alarm correlation engine. In NOMS, 1998.
 
22
]]S. Yemini, S. Kliger, E. Mozes, Y. Yemini, and D. Ohsie. High speed and robust event correlation. Communications Magazine, IEEE, 34(5), 1996.
23
24
25

Collaborative Colleagues:
Ting Wang: colleagues
Mudhakar Srivatsa: colleagues
Dakshi Agrawal: colleagues
Ling Liu: colleagues