ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Constant-factor approximation algorithms for identifying dynamic communities
Full text MovMov (22:23),  PdfPdf (814 KB)
Source
International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining archive
Proceedings of the 15th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining table of contents
Paris, France
SESSION: Research track papers table of contents
Pages 827-836  
Year of Publication: 2009
ISBN:978-1-60558-495-9
Authors
Chayant Tantipathananandh  University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
Tanya Berger-Wolf  University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGKDD: ACM Special Interest Group on Knowledge Discovery in Data
SIGMOD: ACM Special Interest Group on Management of Data
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 49,   Downloads (12 Months): 172,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1557019.1557110
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

We propose two approximation algorithms for identifying communities in dynamic social networks. Communities are intuitively characterized as "unusually densely knit" subsets of a social network. This notion becomes more problematic if the social interactions change over time. Aggregating social networks over time can radically misrepresent the existing and changing community structure. Recently, we have proposed an optimization-based framework for modeling dynamic community structure. Also, we have proposed an algorithm for finding such structure based on maximum weight bipartite matching. In this paper, we analyze its performance guarantee for a special case where all actors can be observed at all times. In such instances, we show that the algorithm is a small constant factor approximation of the optimum. We use a similar idea to design an approximation algorithm for the general case where some individuals are possibly unobserved at times, and to show that the approximation factor increases twofold but remains a constant regardless of the input size. This is the first algorithm for inferring communities in dynamic networks with a provable approximation guarantee. We demonstrate the general algorithm on real data sets. The results confirm the efficiency and effectiveness of the algorithm in identifying dynamic communities.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
J. Aizen, D. Huttenlocher, J. Kleinberg, and A. Novak. Traffic-based feedback on the web. Proc. National Academy of Sciences, 101(Suppl.1):5254--5260, 2004.
2
 
3
J. Baumes, M. Goldberg, M. Magdon-Ismail, and W. Wallace. Discovering hidden groups in communication networks. In Proc. 2nd NSF/NIJ Symposium on Intelligence and Security Informatics, 2004.
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
D. P. Croft, R. James, P. Thomas, C. Hathaway, D. Mawdsley, K. Laland, and J. Krause. Social structure and co-operative interactions in a wild population of guppies (Poecilia reticulata). Behavioural Ecology and Sociobiology, In Press.
 
8
P. C. Cross, J. O. Lloyd-Smith, and W. M. Getz. Disentangling association patterns in fission-fusion societies using African buffalo as an example. Animal Behaviour, 69:499--506, 2005.
 
9
A. Davis, B. B. Gardner, and M. R. Gardner. Deep South. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, 1941.
 
10
R. Diestel. Graph Theory (Graduate Texts in Mathematics). Springer, August 2005.
 
11
 
12
I. R. Fischhoff, S. R. Sundaresan, J. Cordingley, H. M. Larkin, M.-J. Sellier, and D. I. Rubenstein. Social relationships and reproductive state influence leadership roles in movements of plains zebra (Equus burchellii). Animal Behaviour, 73: 825--831, 2007.
 
13
I. R. Fischhoff, S. R. Sundaresan, J. Cordingley, and D. I. Rubenstein. Habitat use and movements of plains zebra (Equus burchelli) in response to predation danger from lions. Behavioral Ecology, 18(4): 725--729, 2007.
 
14
 
15
D. Franzblau and A. Raychaudhuri. Optimal Hamiltonian completions and path covers for trees, and a reduction to maximum flow. Anziam journal, 44(2):193--204, 2002.
 
16
L. Freeman. Finding social groups: A meta-analysis of the southern women data. In R. Breiger, K. Carley, and P. Pattison, editors, Dynamic Social Network Modeling and Analysis. The National Academies Press, Washington, D.C., 2003.
 
17
L. C. Freeman. On the sociological concept of "group": a empirical test of two models. American Journal of Sociology, 98:152--166, 1993.
18
19
 
20
M. Girvan and M. E. J. Newman. Community structure in social and biological networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 99:8271--8276, 2002.
21
22
23
 
24
 
25
M. Kretzschmar and M. Morris. Measures of concurrency in networks and the spread of infectious disease. Math. Biosci., 133:165--195, 1996.
 
26
 
27
M. Magdon-Ismail, M. Goldberg, W. Wallace, and D. Siebecker. Locating hidden groups in communication networks using hidden markov models. In Proc. Intl. Conf. on Intelligence and Security Informatics (ISI 2003), Tucson, AZ, 2003.
 
28
B. Malin. Data and collocation surveillance through location access patterns. In Proc. North American Association for Computational Social and Organizational Science Conf., Pittsburgh, PA, June 2004.
 
29
L. A. Meyers, M. Newman, and B. Pourbohloul. Predicting epidemics on directed contact networks. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 240:400--418, 2006.
 
30
 
31
J. M. Read and M. J. Keeling. Disease evolution on networks: the role of contact structure. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B, 270:699--708, 2003.
 
32
E. M. Rogers. Diffusion of Innovations. Simon&Shuster, Inc., 5th edition, 2003.
 
33
D. I. Rubenstein, S. Sundaresan, I. Fischhoff, and D. Saltz. Social networks in wild asses: Comparing patterns and processes among populations. In A. Stubbe, P. Kaczensky, R. Samjaa, K. Wesche, and M. Stubbe, editors, Exploration into the Biological Resources of Mongolia, volume 10. Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, 2007. In press.
 
34
J. Scott, R. Gass, J. Crowcroft, P. Hui, C. Diot, and A. Chaintreau. CRAWDAD trace cambridge/ haggle/ imote/ infocom (v. 2006-01-31). Downloaded from http://crawdad.cs.dartmouth.edu/cambridge/haggle/imote/infocom.
35
 
36
S. R. Sundaresan, I. R. Fischhoff, J. Dushoff, and D. I. Rubenstein. Network metrics reveal differences in social organization between two fission-fusion species, Grevy's zebra and onager. Oecologia, 2006.
37
 
38
S. Wasserman and F. K. Social Network Analysis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1994.

Collaborative Colleagues:
Chayant Tantipathananandh: colleagues
Tanya Berger-Wolf: colleagues