Making ecology research results useful for resource management: a case study in visual analytics

ABSTRACT

This paper addresses challenges to resource managers' use of scientific research, and reports strategies and informatics tools to ameliorate those challenges. Our work involves repurposing fundamental ecology research data for resource managers, in particular for field foresters who make decisions regarding which trees to leave when harvesting timber stands. We describe needs of managers (e.g., interpreting and implementing value statements from policy, and communicating and justifying decisions to stakeholders) and visual analytics tools and artifacts to repurpose scientific data to those needs. We conclude that visual analytics can produce successful boundary objects to overcome some challenges inherent in differences of approach between researchers and managers, but its use to repurpose data in this way will require further research and development in visual analytics and in the cognitive and social sciences. As adequate informatics tools become available to produce artifacts for repurposing scientific data, interdisciplinary collaboration among research ecologists, resource managers, and biometricians will likely still be needed to produce the artifacts. In particular, future collaboration is necessary to define and test new visual analytics in response to changing policy.

REFERENCES

• 1: Carey, A. B. and R. O. Curtis, 1996, Conservation of Biodiversity: A Useful Paradigm for Forest Ecosystem Management. Wildlife Society Bulletin 24: 610--620.
• 2: Carey, A. B., J. Kershner, B. Biswell and L. Dominguez de Toledo, 1999, Ecological Scale and Forest Development: Squirrels, Dietary Fungi, and Vascular Plants in Managed and Unmanaged Forests. Wildlife Monographs: 3--71.
• 3: Paul R. Carlile, Transferring, Translating, and Transforming: An Integrative Framework for Managing Knowledge Across Boundaries, Organization Science, v.15 n.5, p.555-568, October 2004 [doi>10.1287/orsc.1040.0094]
• 4: Cash, D. W., 2001, "In Order to Aid in Diffusing Useful and Practical Information": Agricultural Extension and Boundary Organizations. Science, Technology,&Human Values 26: 431--453.
• 5: Cash, D. W., W. C. Clark, F. Alcock, N. M. Dickson, N. Eckley, D. H. Guston, J. Jager and R. B. Mitchell, 2003, Knowledge systems for sustainable development. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 100: 8086--8091.
• 6: Cushing, J. and T. Wilson, 2004, Eco-Informatics for Decision Makers: Advancing a Research Agenda Report of an NSF- and USGS/NBII-sponsored Workshop on Eco- Informatics for Resource Management Decision Makers. The Evergreen State College, Olympia.
• 7: Edwards, P. N., S. J. Jackson, G. C. Bowker and C. P. Knobel, 2007, Understanding Infrastructure: Dynamics, Tensions, and Design Report of a Workshop on "History&Theory of Infrastructure: Lessons for New Scientific Cyberinfrastructures".
• 8: Franklin, J. F. and J. A. MacMahon, 2000, Messages from a mountain. Science 288: 1183--1185.
• 9: Heywood, I., S. Cornelius and S. Carver, 1998, An Introduction to Geographical Information Systems. Prentice Hall.
• 10: Ishii, H. and E. D. Ford, 2001, The role of epicormic shoot production in maintaining foliage in old Pseudotsuga menziesii (Douglas-fir) trees. Canadian Journal of Botany 79: 251--264.
• 11: Lach, D., 2009, Moving Science and Immovable Values: Clumsy Solutions for Old-Growth Forests, T. A. Spies and S. L. Duncan, eds. Old Growth in a New World: A Pacific Northwest Icon Reexamined. Island Press, Washington D.C.
• 12: Lach, D., H. Ingram and S. Rayner, 2005, Maintaining the Status Quo: How Institutional Norms and Practices Create Conservative Water Organizations. Texas Law Review 83: 2027--2053.
• 13: Lach, D., P. List, B. Steel and B. Shindler, 2003, Advocacy and Credibility of Ecological Scientists in Resource Decision-making: A Regional Study. BioScience 53: 170--178.
• 14: Lee, K. N., 1993, Compass and Gyroscope Integrating Science and Politics for the Environment. Island Press, Washington, D.C. Covelo, California.
• 15: McGaughey, B., 2008, Personal Communication. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Seattle, WA.
• 16: R Development Core Team, 2007, R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.
• 17: Scott, J. M., J. L. Rachlow and R. T. Lackey, 2008, The science-policy interface: what is an appropriate role for professional societies? Bioscience 58: 865--869.
• 18: Shapira, Z., 1995, Risk Taking: A Managerial Perspective. Russell Sage, New York.
• 19: Star, S. L. and J. R. Griesemer, 1989, Institutional Ecology, 'Translations' and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39. Social Studies of Science 19: 387--420.
• 20: Thomas, J. J., K. A. Cook and National Visualization and Analytics Center, 2005, Illuminating the Path: The Research and Development Agenda for Visual Analytics, J. J. Thomas and K. A. Cook, eds.
• 21: Van Pelt, R., 2007, Identifying Mature and Old Forests in Western Washington. p. 104. Washington State Department of Natural Resources, Olympia, WA.
• 22: Van Pelt, R. and N. M. Nadkarni, 2004, Horizontal and vertical distribution of canopy structural elements of Pseudotsuga menziesii forests in the Pacific Northwest. Forest Science 50.
• 23: WA State DNR, 2007, Forest Practices Illustrated: A Simplified Guide to Forest Practices Rules in Washington State. p. 151. Washington State Department of Natural Resources, Olympia, WA.

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  H. Information Systems
  H.2 DATABASE MANAGEMENT
      H.2.8 Database applications

General Terms:
Design, Human Factors, Management

Keywords:
boundary objects, data reuse, ecoinformatics, science-informed policy and resource management, visual analytics