Multi-channel marketing: an experiment on leading citizens to online public services

ABSTRACT

Governments have a variety of channels at their disposal to help them interact with their citizens. Having realized that citizens still prefer the traditional channels, governments are now focusing on ways to lead them to the web. Previously, we have shown that citizens prefer the use of soft instruments, such as communication. Communication instruments are characterized by the transfer of information from government to citizens, for example, by means of mass media or a letter. This study focuses on how a communication instrument -- in this case a personal letter -- can be used to lead citizens to the digital channel. We also show the effects of the instrument both in terms of channel usage and citizen perceptions. Based on a field experiment, carried out in cooperation with a Dutch national government agency, we show that unobtrusive channel marketing can be effectively used to increase usage of government e-services, without negatively affecting citizens' current level of satisfaction with service delivery.

REFERENCES

• 1: Ebbers, W., Pieterson, W.&Noordman, H. 2008 Electronic government: Rethinking channel management strategies. Government Information Quarterly, 25, 181--201.
• 2: van Deursen, A.&Pieterson, W. 2006 The Internet as a service channel in the Public Sector. In: ICA Conference, Dresden, Germany.
• 3: Pieterson, W.&Ebbers, W. 2008 The Use of Service Channels by Citizens in the Netherlands; implications for multi-channel management. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 74.
• 4: Australian Government. 2005 Australians' use of and satisfaction with e-government services. Commonwealth of Australia, Barton.
• 5: van Deursen, A., van Dijk, J. A. G. M.&Ebbers, W. 2006 Why E-government Usage Lags Behind: Explaining the Gap between Potential and Actual Usage of Electronic Public Services in the Netherlands. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 269--280.
• 6: van Dijk, J., Pieterson, W., van Deursen, A.&Ebbers, W. 2007 E-services for Citizen: The Dutch Usage Case. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 4656, 155--166.
• 7: Willem Pieterson , Jan van Dijk, Channel choice determinants; an exploration of the factors that determine the choice of a service channel in citizen initiated contacts, Proceedings of the 8th annual international conference on Digital government research: bridging disciplines & domains, May 20-23, 2007, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
• 8: Teerling, M.&Pieterson, W. 2009 of Conference Government Multichannel Marketing; How to seduce citizens to the web channels? HICCS, 2009 of Conference, Hawaii.
• 9: Bartels, G. C., Nelissen, W.&Ruelle, H. 1998 De transactionele overheid communicatie als instrument: zes thema's in de overheidsvoorlichting. Kluwer BedrijfsInformatie, Deventer, 510.
• 10: Williamson, O. 1975 Markets and Hierarchy; Analysis and Antitrust Implications. Free Press, New York.
• 11: Williamson, O. 2993 transaction Cost Economics Meets Pesnerian Law and Economics. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 149, 99--118.
• 12: Kumar, V., Mukerji, B., Butt, L.&Persuad, A. 2007 factors for Successful e-Government Adoption a Conceptual framework. The Electronic Journal of e-Government, 5, 63--76.
• 13: Municipality of Amsterdam. 2008 Promotie Digitale Dienstverlening in Amsterdam, Advies en Tips. In: Traineepool 10. Municipality of Amsterdam, Amsterdan.
• 14: Raes, L. 2008 Een geïntegreerd multikanaal e-government een lange weg tussen realiteit en realisatie. Corve, Brussels.
• 15: Iyer, L., Baqir, M. N.&Vollmer, T. 2006 A Comparative Analysis of E-government Strategies. In: E-Government: Macro Issues, 141--152.
• 16: Doria Pilling , Heike Boeltzig, Moving toward e-government: effective strategies for increasing access and use of the internet among non-internet users in the U.S. and U.K., Proceedings of the 8th annual international conference on Digital government research: bridging disciplines & domains, May 20-23, 2007, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
• 17: Daniela V. Dimitrova , Yu-Che Chen, Profiling the Adopters of E-Government Information and Services, Social Science Computer Review, v.24 n.2, p.172-188, May 2006 [doi>10.1177/0894439305281517]
• 18: Warkentin, M., Gefen, D., Pavlou, P. A.&Rose, G. M. 2002 Encouraging Citizen Adoption of E-government by Building Trust. Electronic Markets, 12, 157--162.
• 19: Falk, T., Schepers, J., Hammerschmidt, M.&Bauer, H., H,. 2007 Identifying Cross-Channel Dissynergies for Multichannel Service Providers. Journal of Service Research, 10, 143--160.
• 20: Myers, J. 2004 Steering Customers to the Right Channels. McKinsey Quarterly: McKinsey on Marketing, October 2004.
• 21: Accenture. 2006 Leadership in Customer Service, Building the Trust. Accenture.
• 22: Dholakia, R. R., Miao, Z.&Nikhilesh, D. 2005 Multichannel Retailing: A Case Study of Early Experiences. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 1963--74.
• 23: Flumian, M., Coa, A.&Kernaghan, K. 2007 Transforming Service to Canadians: the Service Canada Model. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 73, 557--568.
• 24: Alexander Schellong , Dieter Mans, Citizens preferences towards one-stop government, Proceedings of the 2004 annual national conference on Digital government research, p.1-3, May 24-26, 2004, Seattle, WA

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  K. Computing Milieux
  K.4 COMPUTERS AND SOCIETY
      K.4.0 General

General Terms:
Design, Human Factors, Management, Theory

Keywords:
channel marketing, e-government, e-services, multi-channeling, service channels