Top-level decisions through public deliberation on the internet: evidence from the evolution of Java governance

ABSTRACT

This study found internet-enabled public deliberation having a direct impact on top-level decisions and it identified institutional mechanisms by which this occurs. Most government initiatives aimed at promoting online deliberation all short of expectations. The participatory governance model developed in this study presents design and process parameters along which more interactive and engaging online experiences can be modeled. The applicability of the propositions is demonstrated by systematically collecting online data and analyzing public deliberation during the evolution of Java governance. Self-selection of participants and opposing views, mutual adjustment, and high influence combined with incremental decision-making were shown to be critical for institutionalizing a broadly supported governance approach.

REFERENCES

• 1: Balnaves, Mark, Debra Mayrhofer, and Brian Shoesmith. "Media professions and the new humanism." Journal of Media&Cultural Studies. Vol 18 (2004): 191--203.
• 2: Judit Bar-Ilan , Mazlita Mat-Hassan , Mark Levene, Methods for comparing rankings of search engine results, Computer Networks: The International Journal of Computer and Telecommunications Networking, v.50 n.10, p.1448-1463, 14 July 2006 [doi>10.1016/j.comnet.2005.10.020]
• 3: Barber, Benjamin. Strong democracy: participatory politics for a new age. Berkeley CA: University of California Press, 1984.
• 4: Ted Becker, Rating the impact of new technologies on democracy, Communications of the ACM, v.44 n.1, p.39-43, Jan. 2001 [doi>10.1145/357489.357503]
• 5: Bichard, Shannon L. "Building blogs: a multi-dimensional analysis of the distribution of frames on the 2004 presidential candidate web sites." Journalism&Mass Communication Quarterly. Vol 83 Issue 2 (2006): 329--345.
• 6: Charnley, Mitchell V. Reporting. New York NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1975.
• 7: Edith Cohen , Balachander Krishnamurthy, A short walk in the Blogistan, Computer Networks: The International Journal of Computer and Telecommunications Networking, v.50 n.5, p.615-630, 6 April 2006 [doi>10.1016/j.comnet.2005.05.027]
• 8: Cohen, Joshua and Archon Fung. "Radical democracy." Swiss Journal of Political Science. Vol 10 Issue 4 (2004): 23--34.
• 9: Stephen Coleman , Giles Moss, Governing at a distance - politicians in the blogosphere, Information Polity, v.13 n.1-2, p.7-20, January 2008
• 10: Dahl, Robert A. "A Rejoinder." Association for Computing Machinery. Journal of the Association for Computing Machinery. Vol 53 (1991): 226--231.
• 11: de Nooy, Wouter, Andrej Mrvar, and Vladimir Batagelj. "Exploratory social network analysis with Pajek". An introduction to qualitative research. Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press, 2005.
• 12: Sándor Dominich , Adrienn Skrop, PageRank and Interaction Information Retrieval: Research Articles, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, v.56 n.1, p.63-69, January 2005 [doi>10.1002/asi.v56:1]
• 13: Ferguson, Ross and Barry Griffiths. "Thin democracy? Parliamentarians, citizens and the influence of blogging on political engagement." Parliamentary Affairs. Vol 59 Issue 2 (2006): 366--374.
• 14: Fiorina, Morris P. "Extreme voices: a dark side of civic engagement". Civic engagement in American democracy. Eds. Theda Skocpol and Morris P Fiorina. Washington DC: Brookings Institution Press, 1999.
• 15: Mary Francoli , Stephen Ward, 21st century soapboxes? MPs and their blogs, Information Polity, v.13 n.1-2, p.21-39, January 2008
• 16: Fung, Archon. "Democratic theory and political science: a pragmatic method of constructive engagement." American Political Science Review. Vol 101 Issue 3 (2007): 443--458.
• 17: Fung, Archon. "Varieties of participation in complex governance." Public Administration Review. Vol 66 (2006): 66--75.
• 18: Garcia, Helio Fred and Laurel Hart. "Beware (and prepare for) the blogosphere era." Strategy&Leadership. Vol 35 Issue 6 (2007): 51--53.
• 19: Gibson, Rachel K, Wainer Lusoli, and Stephen Ward. "Online participation in the UK: testing a 'contextualised' model of internet effects." British Journal of Politics&International Relations. Vol 7 Issue 4 (2005): 561--583.
• 20: Glaser, Barney G. and Anselm Strauss. The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago IL: Aldine, 1967.
• 21: Griffiths, Mary. "E-citizens: blogging as democratic practice." Electronic Journal of E-Government. Vol 2 Issue 3 (2004): 155--166.
• 22: Habermas, Jürgen, Sara Lennox, and Frank Lennox. "The public sphere: an encyclopedia article." New German Critique. Vol 3 (1974 {1964}): 49--55.
• 23: Huang, Chun-Yao et al. "Bloggers' motivations and behaviors: a model." Journal of Advertising Research. Vol 47 Issue 4 (2007): 472--484.
• 24: Jäger, Siegfried. Kritische Diskursanalyse. Duisburg DE: DISS, 2001.
• 25: Kaschesky, Michael. Institutional change in the Java application server field: A study on institutional entrepreneurship. Doctoral Thesis. Birmingham UK: Aston Business School, 2008.
• 26: Kavanaugh, Andrea, B. Joon Kim, and Manuel A Perez-Quinones. "Net gains in political participation: secondary effects of internet on community." Information, Communication&Society. Vol 11 Issue 7 (2008): 933--963.
• 27: Lawson-Borders, Gracie and Rita Kirk. "Blogs in campaign communication." American Behavioral Scientist. Vol 49 Issue 4 (2005): 548--559.
• 28: Lee, Jae Kook. "The effect of the internet on homogeneity of the media agenda" Journalism&Mass Communication Quarterly. Vol 84 Issue 4 (2007): 745--760.
• 29: Lindblom, Charles E. The intelligence of democracy. New York NY: Free Press, 1965.
• 30: McKenna, Laura. "'Getting the word out': policy bloggers use their soap box to make change." Review of Policy Research. Vol 24 Issue 3 (2007): 209--229.
• 31: Pettigrew, Andrew M. "Longitudinal field research on change: theory and practice." Organization Science. Vol 1 Issue 3 (1990): 267--292.
• 32: Doug Schuler, Community networks: building a new participatory medium, Communications of the ACM, v.37 n.1, p.38-51, Jan. 1994 [doi>10.1145/175222.175225]
• 33: Strauss, Anselm and Juliet Corbin. Basics of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks CA: SAGE Publications, 1990.
• 34: Sweetser, Trammell, Kaye D. "Candidate campaign blogs: directly reaching out to the youth vote." American Behavioral Scientist. Vol 50 Issue 9 (2007): 1255--1263.
• 35: Elaine G. Toms , Adam R. Taves, Measuring user perceptions of web site reputation, Information Processing and Management: an International Journal, v.40 n.2, p.291-317, March 2004 [doi>10.1016/j.ipm.2003.08.007]
• 36: Trammell, Kaye D and Ana Keshelashvili. "Examining the new influencers: a self-presentation study of a-list blogs." Journalism&Mass Communication Quarterly. Vol 82 Issue 4 (2005): 968--982.
• 37: Ul-Haq, Rehan. "Searching the internet." Qualitative Market Research. Vol 4 Issue 4 (2001): 238--248.
• 38: Wallsten, Kevin. "Agenda setting and the blogosphere: an analysis of the relationship between mainstream media and political blogs." Review of Policy Research. Vol 24 Issue 6 (2007): 567--587.
• 39: Weick, Karl E. The social psychology of organizing (2nd ed.). Reading MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing, 1979.
• 40: Scott Wright, Read My Day? Communication, campaigning and councillors' blogs, Information Polity, v.13 n.1-2, p.41-55, January 2008
• 41: Wright, Scott. "Electrifying democracy: ten years of policy and practice." Parliamentary Affairs. Vol 59 Issue 2 (2006): 236--249.

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  I. Computing Methodologies
  I.6 SIMULATION AND MODELING
      I.6.5 Model Development

Keywords:
e-government, government, innovation, participation, policy making, politics, public administration, public consultation