The social life of social networks

Subscribe (Full Service)


	Search: The ACM Digital Library The Guide

	Feedback

The social life of social networks: Facebook linkage patterns in the 2008 U.S. presidential election

Full text

Pdf (868 KB)

Source

ACM International Conference Proceeding Series; Vol. 390 archive
Proceedings of the 10th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research: Social Networks: Making Connections between Citizens, Data and Government table of contents

SESSION: Social networks in government and politics table of contents

Pages 6-15

Year of Publication: 2009

ISBN:978-1-60558-535-2

Authors

Scott P. Robertson	University of Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu, HI
Ravi K. Vatrapu	Center for Applied ICT (CAICT), Denmark
Richard Medina	University of Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu, HI

Sponsor

: Digital Government Society of North America

Publisher

Digital Government Society of North America

Bibliometrics

Downloads (6 Weeks): 67, Downloads (12 Months): 161, Citation Count: 0

Additional Information:

abstract references index terms collaborative colleagues

Tools and Actions:	Review this Article Save this Article to a Binder Display Formats: BibTeX EndNote ACM Ref

ABSTRACT

This paper examines the linkage patterns of people who posted links on the Facebook "walls" of Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, and John McCain over two years prior to the 2008 U.S. Presidential election. Linkage patterns indicate the destinations to which participants in these social networking dialogues wished to send other participants. We show a strong integration of the Web 2.0 and new media technologies of social networking, online video, and blogs. Outside of video content, users tended to direct others to groups and applications within the Facebook community, but this homophilous behavior was more common for infrequent posters. Ten internet domains accounted for 90% of all links, and the top ten contained a mixture of news, candidate, and blog sites. We offer a discussion of the Facebook candidate walls as a public sphere for political discourse and introduce some design concepts for visualizing and navigating the walls.

REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

	1	Lada A. Adamic , Natalie Glance, The political blogosphere and the 2004 U.S. election: divided they blog, Proceedings of the 3rd international workshop on Link discovery, p.36-43, August 21-25, 2005, Chicago, Illinois [doi>10.1145/1134271.1134277]
	2	Dahlgren, P. 2005. The Internet, Public spheres, and political communication: Dispersion and deliberation. Political Communication, 22 (2), 147--162.
	3	J. Donath , D. Boyd, Public Displays of Connection, BT Technology Journal, v.22 n.4, p.71-82, October 2004 [doi>10.1023/B:BTTJ.0000047585.06264.cc]
	4	Foot, K. A. and Schneider, S. M. 2006. Web Campaigning. MIT Press, Cambride, MA.
	5	Foot, K. A., Schneider, S. M., Dougherty, M., Xenos, M.,&Larsen, E. 2003. Analyzing linking practices: Candidate sites in the 2002 US Electoral Web Sphere. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 8(4). Available at http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol8/issue4/foot.html.
	6	Smith, A.&Raine, L. 2008. The Internet and the 2008 Election. Washington, DC: Pew Internet and American Life Project (June 15). DOI= http://www.pewinternet.org/pdfs/PIP_2008_election.pdf
	7	Habermas, J. 1991. The public sphere. In Mukerji, C.&Schudson, M. eds. Rethinking Popular Culture: Contemporary Perspectives in Cultural Studies, University of California Press, Berkeley, 398--404.
	8	Habermas, J. 1991. The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
	9	Susan C. Herring , Inna Kouper , John C. Paolillo , Lois Ann Scheidt , Michael Tyworth , Peter Welsch , Elijah Wright , Ning Yu, Conversations in the Blogosphere: An Analysis "From the Bottom Up", Proceedings of the Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'05) - Track 4, p.107.2, January 03-06, 2005 [doi>10.1109/HICSS.2005.167]
	10	Cliff Lampe , Nicole Ellison , Charles Steinfield, A face(book) in the crowd: social Searching vs. social browsing, Proceedings of the 2006 20th anniversary conference on Computer supported cooperative work, November 04-08, 2006, Banff, Alberta, Canada [doi>10.1145/1180875.1180901]
	11	McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L. and Cook, J. 2001. Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27 (1). 415--444.
	12	Nie, N. H. 2001. Sociability, interpersonal relations, and the Internet: Reconciling conflicting findings. American Behavioral Scientist, 45(3), 426--437.
	13	PEW Internet and American Life Project, 2008. Social Networking and Online Videos Take Off: Internet's Broader Role in Campaign 2008. DOI= http://peoplepress.org/reports/pdf/384.pdf
	14	Putnam, R. D. 2000. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. NY: Simon&Schuster.
	15	Quan-Haase, A., Wellman, B., with, Witte, J.,&Hampton, K. 2002. Capitalizing on the Internet: Social contact, civic engagement, and sense of community. In B. Wellman&C. Haythornthwaite. eds. Internet and Everyday Life, Oxford: Blackwell, 291--324.
	16	Wellman, B., Quan-Haase, A., Witte, J.,&Hampton, K. N. 2001. Does the Internet increase, decrease, or supplement social capital? Social networks, participation, and community commitment. American Behavioral Scientist, 45 (3), 437--456.
	17	Westling, M. 2007. Expanding the Public Sphere: The Impact of Facebook on Political Communication. DOI= http://www.thenewvernacular.com/projects/facebook_and_political_communication.pdf
	18	Anthony G. Wilhelm, Democracy in the Digital Age: Challenges to Political Life in Cyberspace, Routledge, New York, NY, 2000
	19	Williams, B. and Gulati, G. 2008. The political impact of Facebook: Evidence from the 2006 midterm elections and 2008 nomination contest. Politics and Technology Review, 1, 11--21.