ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Handle Flags: efficient and flexible selections for inking applications
Full text PdfPdf (2.35 MB)
Source
ACM International Conference Proceeding Series; Vol. 324 archive
Proceedings of Graphics Interface 2009 table of contents
Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada
SESSION: Pen and touch interfaces table of contents
Pages 167-174  
Year of Publication: 2009
ISBN ~ ISSN:0713-5424 , 978-1-56881-470-4
Authors
Tovi Grossman  Autodesk Research
Patrick Baudisch  Microsoft Research
Ken Hinckley  Microsoft Research
Sponsor
: The Canadian Human-Computer Communications Society / Société Canadienne du Dialogue Humaine Machine (CHCCS/SCDHM)
Publisher
Canadian Information Processing Society  Toronto, Ont., Canada, Canada
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 11,   Downloads (12 Months): 39,   Citation Count: 1
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  

ABSTRACT

There are a number of challenges associated with content selection in pen-based interfaces. Supplementary buttons to enter a selection mode may not be available, and selections may require a careful and error prone lasso stroke. In this paper we describe the design and evaluation of Handle Flags, a new localized technique used to select and perform commands on ink strokes in pen-operated interfaces. When the user positions the pen near an ink stroke, Handle Flags are displayed for the potential selections that the ink stroke could belong to (such as proximal strokes comprising a word or drawing). Tapping the handle allows the user to access the corresponding selection, without requiring a complex lasso stroke. Our studies show that Handle Flags offer significant benefits in comparison to traditional techniques, and are a promising technique for pen-based applications.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
2
 
3
Alvarado, C. (2004). Sketch Recognition User Interfaces: Guidelines for Design and Development. AAAI Fall Symposium on Intelligent Pen-based Interfaces. 8--14.
 
4
Buxton, W., Fiume, E., Hill, R., Lee, A. and Woo, C. (1983). Continuous Hand-Gesture Driven Input. Graphic Interface. 191--195.
 
5
Deming, K. and Lank, E. (2004). Managing Ambiguous Intention in Mode Inferencing. Proc of the AAAI Fall Symposium Series. 49--54.
6
7
8
 
9
Guiard, Y. (1987). Asymmetric division of labor in human skilled bimanual action: The kinematic chain as a model. Journal of Motor Behavior. 19(4): 486--517.
10
 
11
12
13
 
14
Lank, E. and Saund, E. (2005). Sloppy Selection: Providing an Accurate Interpretation of Imprecise Stylus Selection Gestures. Computers and Graphics. 29(4): 490--500.
15
16
17
18
19
 
20
Norman, D. A. (1981). Categorization of Action Slips. Psychology Review. 88(1): 1--15.
 
21
22
23
24
25
 
26
Saund, E., Mahoney, J., Fleet, D., Larner, D. and Lank, E. (2002). Perceptual Organization as a Foundation for Intelligent Sketch Editing. AAAI Symposium on Sketch Understanding. 118--125.
27
 
28
 
29


Collaborative Colleagues:
Tovi Grossman: colleagues
Patrick Baudisch: colleagues
Ken Hinckley: colleagues