|
ABSTRACT
Multitouch workstations support direct-touch, bimanual, and multifinger interaction. Previous studies have separately examined the benefits of these three interaction attributes over mouse-based interactions. In contrast, we present an empirical user study that considers these three interaction attributes together for a single task, such that we can quantify and compare the performances of each attribute. In our experiment users select multiple targets using either a mouse-based workstation equipped with one mouse, or a multitouch workstation using either one finger, two fingers (one from each hand), or multiple fingers. We find that the fastest multitouch condition is about twice as fast as the mouse-based workstation, independent of the number of targets. Direct-touch with one finger accounts for an average of 83% of the reduction in selection time. Bimanual interaction, using at least two fingers, one on each hand, accounts for the remaining reduction in selection time. Further, we find that for novice multitouch users there is no significant difference in selection time between using one finger on each hand and using any number of fingers for this task. Based on these observations we conclude with several design guidelines for developing multitouch user interfaces.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
 |
1
|
|
 |
2
|
|
| |
3
|
W. Barnert. A comparison of one-handed and two-handed direct and indirect computer interaction. Technical report, Department of Computer Science, Tufts University, Medford, Mass., 11 2005.
|
 |
4
|
|
 |
5
|
Eric A. Bier , Maureen C. Stone , Ken Pier , William Buxton , Tony D. DeRose, Toolglass and magic lenses: the see-through interface, Proceedings of the 20th annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques, p.73-80, August 02-06, 1993, Anaheim, CA
[doi> 10.1145/166117.166126]
|
 |
6
|
|
 |
7
|
|
| |
8
|
J. Diedrichsen, E. Hazeltine, S. Kennerley, and R. B. Ivry. Moving to directly cued locations abolishes spatial interference during bimanual actions. Psychological Science, 12(6):493--498, 2001.
|
 |
9
|
R. F. Dillon , Jeff D. Edey , Jo W. Tombaugh, Measuring the true cost of command selection: techniques and results, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems: Empowering people, p.19-26, April 01-05, 1990, Seattle, Washington, United States
[doi> 10.1145/97243.97247]
|
 |
10
|
Clifton Forlines , Daniel Wigdor , Chia Shen , Ravin Balakrishnan, Direct-touch vs. mouse input for tabletop displays, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, April 28-May 03, 2007, San Jose, California, USA
[doi> 10.1145/1240624.1240726]
|
| |
11
|
Y. Guiard. Asymmetric division of labor in human skilled bimanual action: The kinematic chain as a mode. Journal of Motor Behavior, 19(4):486--517, 1987.
|
| |
12
|
Y. Guiard and T. Ferrand. Asymmetry in bimanual skills. In Manual asymmetries in motor performance, CRC Press., 1995.
|
 |
13
|
|
 |
14
|
Mark Hancock , Sheelagh Carpendale , Andy Cockburn, Shallow-depth 3d interaction: design and evaluation of one-, two- and three-touch techniques, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, April 28-May 03, 2007, San Jose, California, USA
[doi> 10.1145/1240624.1240798]
|
 |
15
|
Ken Hinckley , Mary Czerwinski , Mike Sinclair, Interaction and modeling techniques for desktop two-handed input, Proceedings of the 11th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology, p.49-58, November 01-04, 1998, San Francisco, California, United States
[doi> 10.1145/288392.288572]
|
 |
16
|
|
 |
17
|
Ken Hinckley , Randy Pausch , Dennis Proffitt , James Patten , Neal Kassell, Cooperative bimanual action, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, p.27-34, March 22-27, 1997, Atlanta, Georgia, United States
[doi> 10.1145/258549.258571]
|
 |
18
|
Paul Kabbash , William Buxton , Abigail Sellen, Two-handed input in a compound task, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems: celebrating interdependence, p.417-423, April 24-28, 1994, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
[doi> 10.1145/191666.191808]
|
| |
19
|
|
| |
20
|
J. A. S. Kelso, D. L. Southard, and D. Goodman. On the coordination of two-handed movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 5(2):229--238, 1979.
|
| |
21
|
J. A. S. Kelso, D. L. Southard, and D. Goodman. On the nature of human interlimb coordination. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 203(4384):1029--1031, 1979.
|
 |
22
|
|
 |
23
|
Celine Latulipe , Stephen Mann , Craig S. Kaplan , Charlie L. A. Clarke, symSpline: symmetric two-handed spline manipulation, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in computing systems, April 22-27, 2006, Montréal, Québec, Canada
[doi> 10.1145/1124772.1124825]
|
| |
24
|
MERL - DiamondTouch. http://www.merl.com/projects/DiamondTouch/.
|
| |
25
|
Microsoft Surface. http://www.microsoft.com/surface/index.html.
|
| |
26
|
|
 |
27
|
|
| |
28
|
|
| |
29
|
Russell Owen , Gordon Kurtenbach , George Fitzmaurice , Thomas Baudel , Bill Buxton, When it gets more difficult, use both hands: exploring bimanual curve manipulation, Proceedings of Graphics Interface 2005, May 09-11, 2005, Victoria, British Columbia
|
| |
30
|
Perceptive Pixel. http://www.perceptivepixel.com/.
|
 |
31
|
|
| |
32
|
Stacey D. Scott , Karen D. Grant , Regan L. Mandryk, System guidelines for co-located, collaborative work on a tabletop display, Proceedings of the eighth conference on European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, p.159-178, September 14-18, 2003, Helsinki, Finland
|
| |
33
|
|
 |
34
|
|
|