ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
PEIR, the personal environmental impact report, as a platform for participatory sensing systems research
Full text PdfPdf (2.63 MB)
Source
International Conference On Mobile Systems, Applications And Services archive
Proceedings of the 7th international conference on Mobile systems, applications, and services table of contents
Kraków, Poland
SESSION: Experimental platforms table of contents
Pages 55-68  
Year of Publication: 2009
ISBN:978-1-60558-566-6
Authors
Min Mun  University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, USA
Sasank Reddy  University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, USA
Katie Shilton  University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, USA
Nathan Yau  University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, USA
Jeff Burke  University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, USA
Deborah Estrin  University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, USA
Mark Hansen  University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, USA
Eric Howard  University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, USA
Ruth West  University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, USA
Péter Boda  Nokia Research Center Palo Alto, Palo Alto, USA
Sponsors
SIGMOBILE: ACM Special Interest Group on Mobility of Systems, Users, Data and Computing
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 64,   Downloads (12 Months): 171,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1555816.1555823
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

PEIR, the Personal Environmental Impact Report, is a participatory sensing application that uses location data sampled from everyday mobile phones to calculate personalized estimates of environmental impact and exposure. It is an example of an important class of emerging mobile systems that combine the distributed processing capacity of the web with the personal reach of mobile technology. This paper documents and evaluates the running PEIR system, which includes mobile handset based GPS location data collection, and server-side processing stages such as HMM-based activity classification (to determine transportation mode); automatic location data segmentation into "trips''; lookup of traffic, weather, and other context data needed by the models; and environmental impact and exposure calculation using efficient implementations of established models. Additionally, we describe the user interface components of PEIR and present usage statistics from a two month snapshot of system use. The paper also outlines new algorithmic components developed based on experience with the system and undergoing testing for integration into PEIR, including: new map-matching and GSM-augmented activity classification techniques, and a selective hiding mechanism that generates believable proxy traces for times a user does not want their real location revealed.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
J. Burke, D. Estrin, M. Hansen, A. Parker, N. Ramanathan, S. Reddy, and M.B. Srivastava. Participatory sensing. In ACM Sensys WSW Workshop, 2006.
 
2
Ecorio. http://ecorio.org, 2008.
 
3
Carbondiem. http://carbonhero.com, 2008.
 
4
Ubigreen. http://dub.washington.edu/ubigreen, 2008.
 
5
E. Moretti J. Currie, S. DellaVigna and V. Pathania. The effect of fast food restaurants on obesity. Working Paper 14721, National Bureau of Economic Research, February 2009.
 
6
CA. Pope III, M. Ezzati, DW. Dockery. Fine-Particulate Air Pollution and Life Expectancy in the United States. New England Journal of Medicine, 360(4):376--386, 2009.
 
7
K. Shilton, J. Burke, D. Estrin, M. Hansen, and M. Srivastava. Participatory Privacy in Urban Sensing. MODUS, 2008.
 
8
K. Shilton, J. Burke, D. Estrin, and M. Hansen. Privacy and Participation in Urban Sensing. Interaction, 21:235--272, 2008.
 
9
K. Shilton, J. Burke, D. Estrin, M. Hansen, and M. Srivastava. Achieving Participatory Privacy Regulation: Guidelines for Urban Sensing. CENS, UCLA, 2008.
 
10
Gpsbabel. http://gpsbabel.sourceforge.net, 2008.
 
11
A. Joki, J. Burke, and D. Estrin. Campaignr-a framework for participatory data collection on mobile phones. Technical report, CENS, UCLA, 2007.
 
12
Nokia nokoscope. http://alpha.nokoscope.com, 2008.
 
13
Postgis. http://postgis.refractions.net, 2008.
 
14
Wordpress. http://wordpress.org, 2008.
 
15
Modest maps. http://modestmaps.com, 2008.
 
16
D. J. Patterson, L. Liao, D. Fox, and H. Kautz. Inferring High-Level Behavior from Low-Level Sensors. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 73--89, 2003.
 
17
 
18
 
19
L. Liao, D. Fox, and H. Kautz. Location-based activity recognition using relational Markov networks. In Proc. of the International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI), 2005.
 
20
M.A. Quddus, W.Y. Ochieng, and R.B. Noland. Current map-matching algorithms for transport applications: State-of-the art and future research directions. Transportation Research Part C, 15(5):312--328, 2007.
 
21
LR Rabiner. A tutorial on hidden Markov models and selected applications inspeech recognition. Proceedings of the IEEE, 77(2):257--286, 1989.
 
22
G. Rigoll, A. Kosmala, and S. Eickeler. High Performance Real-Time Gesture Recognition Using Hidden Markov Models. LNCS, pages 69--80, 1998.
 
23
GD Forney Jr. The viterbi algorithm. Proceedings of the IEEE, 61(3):268--278, 1973.
 
24
Google maps with my location. http://google.com/mobile/gmm/mylocation/, 2008.
 
25
I. Anderson and H. Muller. Practical activity recognition using GSM data. Technical report, CSTR-06-016, Computer Science, University of Bristol, 2006.
 
26
T. Sohn, A. Varshavsky, A. LaMarca, M.Y. Chen, T. Choudhury, I. Smith, S. Consolvo, J. Hightower, W.G. Griswold, and E. de Lara. Mobility Detection Using Everyday GSM Traces. LNCS, 4206:212, 2006.
 
27
64 million smart phones shipped worldwide in 2006. http://canalys.com/pr/2007/r2007024.htm, 2006.
 
28
 
29
S. Consolvo, D.W. McDonald, T. Toscos, M.Y. Chen, J. Froehlich, B. Harrison, P. Klasnja, A. LaMarca, L. LeGrand, R. Libby, et al. Activity sensing in the wild: a field trial of ubifit garden. 2008.
 
30
Y. Zheng, L. Liu, L. Wang, and X. Xie. Learning transportation mode from raw gps data for geographic applications on the web. 2008.
 
31
S. Reddy, J. Burke, D. Estrin, M. Hansen, and M. Srivastava. Determining Transportation Mode On Mobile Phones.
 
32
E. Miluzzo, N.D. Lane, S.B. Eisenman, and A.T. Campbell. CenceMe-Injecting Sensing Presence into Social Networking Applications. LNCS, 4793:1, 2007.
 
33
M. Mun, D. Estrin, J. Burke, and M. Hansen. Parsimonious Mobility Classification using GSM and WiFi Traces, 2008.
 
34
ESRI. ArcGIS 8. ESRI, Redlands, CA.
 
35
La county department of public health facility list. http://publichealth.lacounty.gov/rating/, 2008.
 
36
MF Barth, PA Miller, and AE MacDonald. MADIS: The Meteorological Assimilation Data Ingest System. In Symp. on Observations, Data Assimilation, and Probabilistic Prediction, pages 20--25, 2002.
 
37
U.s. census bureau zip code tabulation areas. http://census.gov/geo/ZCTA/zcta.html, 2008.
 
38
Southern california association of governments traffic flow model. http://scag.ca.gov, 2008.
 
39
CAR. Board. EMFAC: Emissions Factor Model, 2000.
 
40
C.J. Stone, M. Hansen, C. Kooperberg, and Y.K. Truong. Polynomial splines and their tensor products in extended linear modeling. Ann. Statist, 1997.
 
41
R. Ihaka and R. Gentleman. R: A Language for Data Analysis and Graphics. Journal of Computational Graphical Statistics, 5:299--314, 1996.
 
42
S. Amin, S. Andrews, S. Apte, J. Arnold, J. Ban, M. Benko, A.M. Bayen, B. Chiou, C. Claudel, C. Claudel, et al. Mobile century-using GPS mobile phones as traffic sensors: a field experiment. In World congress on ITS, pages 16--20, 2008.
 
43
P. Ong, M. Graham, and D. Houston. Policy and Programmatic Importance of Spatial Alignment of Data Sources, 2006.
44
 
45
H. Nissenbaum. Protecting Privacy in an Information Age: The Problem of Privacy in Public. Law and Philosophy, 17(5):559--596, 1998.
 
46
J.E. COHEN. Privacy, Visibility, Transparency, and Exposure. Univ. of Chicago Law Review, 75(1), 2008.
47
48
 
49
J. Krumm. Inference Attacks on Location Tracks. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 4480:127, 2007.
 
50
L. Bannon. Forgetting as a feature, not a bug: the duality of memory and implications for ubiquitous computing. CoDesign, 2(1):3--15, 2006.
 
51
J.F. Blanchette and D.G. Johnson. Data Retention and the Panoptic Society: The Social Benefits of Forgetfulness. The Information Society, 18(1):33--45, 2002.
 
52
V. Mayer-Schoenberger. Useful Void: The Art of Forgetting in the Age of Ubiquitous Computing. 2007.
 
53
R. Perlman. The Ephemerizer: Making Data Disappear. Info. System Security, 1(1):51--68, 2005.

Collaborative Colleagues:
Min Mun: colleagues
Sasank Reddy: colleagues
Katie Shilton: colleagues
Nathan Yau: colleagues
Jeff Burke: colleagues
Deborah Estrin: colleagues
Mark Hansen: colleagues
Eric Howard: colleagues
Ruth West: colleagues
Péter Boda: colleagues