ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Firefly: illuminating future network-on-chip with nanophotonics
Full text PdfPdf (1.36 MB)
Source
International Symposium on Computer Architecture archive
Proceedings of the 36th annual international symposium on Computer architecture table of contents
Austin, TX, USA
SESSION: On-chip interconnection networks table of contents
Pages 429-440  
Year of Publication: 2009
ISBN:978-1-60558-526-0
Also published in ...
Authors
Yan Pan  Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA
Prabhat Kumar  Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA
John Kim  KAIST, Daejeon, South Korea
Gokhan Memik  Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA
Yu Zhang  Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA
Alok Choudhary  Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA
Sponsors
SIGARCH: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer Architecture
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 48,   Downloads (12 Months): 191,   Citation Count: 1
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1555754.1555808
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Future many-core processors will require high-performance yet energy-efficient on-chip networks to provide a communication substrate for the increasing number of cores. Recent advances in silicon nanophotonics create new opportunities for on-chip networks. To efficiently exploit the benefits of nanophotonics, we propose Firefly - a hybrid, hierarchical network architecture. Firefly consists of clusters of nodes that are connected using conventional, electrical signaling while the inter-cluster communication is done using nanophotonics - exploiting the benefits of electrical signaling for short, local communication while nanophotonics is used only for global communication to realize an efficient on-chip network. Crossbar architecture is used for inter-cluster communication. However, to avoid global arbitration, the crossbar is partitioned into multiple, logical crossbars and their arbitration is localized. Our evaluations show that Firefly improves the performance by up to 57% compared to an all-electrical concentrated mesh (CMESH) topology on adversarial traffic patterns and up to 54% compared to an all-optical crossbar (OP XBAR) on traffic patterns with locality. If the energy-delay-product is compared, Firefly improves the efficiency of the on-chip network by up to 51% and 38% compared to CMESH and OP XBAR, respectively.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
A. Al-Azzawi. Photonics: Principles and Practices. CRC Press, 2007.
 
2
V. Almeida, C. Barrios, R. Panepucci, M. Lipson, M. Foster, D. Ouzounov, and A. Gaeta. All-optical switching on a silicon chip. Optics Letters, 29:2867--2869, 2004.
3
 
4
C. A. Barrios, V. R. Almeida, and M. Lipson. Low-power-consumption short-length and high-modulation-depth silicon electro-optic modulator. Journal of Lightwave Technology, 21(4):1089--1098, 2003.
 
5
 
6
S. Bell, B. Edwards, J. Amann, R. Conlin, K. Joyce, V. Leung, J. Mackay, M. Reif, L. Bao, J. Brown, M. Mattina, C.-C. Miao, C. Ramey, D. Wentzlaff, W. Anderson, E. Berger, N. Fairbanks, D. Khan, F. Montenegro, J. Stickney, and J. Zook. Tile64 processor: A 64-core soc with mesh interconnect. In Solid-State Circuits Conference, 2008. ISSCC 2008. Digest of Technical Papers. IEEE International, pages 88--598, 2008.
 
7
N. Binkert. Personal communication, Aug. 2008.
 
8
 
9
M. Chang, J. Cong, A. Kaplan, M. Naik, G. Reinman, E. Socher, and S.-W. Tam. CMP network-on-chip overlaid with multi-band rf-interconnect. In International Symposium on High-Performance Computer Architecture (HPCA), pages 191--202, Feb. 2008.
10
 
11
12
 
13
R. Das, S. Eachempati, A. Mishra, V. Narayanan, and C. Das. Design and evaluation of a hierarchical on-chip interconnect for next-generation CMPs. In International Symposium on High-Performance Computer Architecture (HPCA), pages 175--186, Raleigh, NC, USA, Feb. 2009.
 
14
P. Gratz, C. Kim, R. McDonald, S. Keckler, and D. Burger. Implementation and evaluation of on-chip network architectures. In International Conference on Computer Design (ICCD), pages 477--484, San Jose, CA, 2006.
 
15
A. Gubenko, I. Krestnikov, D. Livshtis, S. Mikhrin, A. Kovsh, L. West, C. Bornholdt, N. Grote, and A. Zhukov. Error-free 10 gbit/s transmission using individual fabry-perot modes of low-noise quantum-dot laser. Electronic Letters, 43(25):1430--1431, 2007.
16
 
17
A. Jose and K. Shepard. Distributed loss-compensation techniques for energy-efficient low-latency on-chip communication. Solid-State Circuits, IEEE Journal of, 42(6):1415--1424, June 2007.
 
18
P. Kapur and K. C. Saraswat. Comparisons between electrical and optical interconnects for on-chip signaling. In International Interconnect Technology Conference, pages 89--91, Burlingame, CA, Jun. 2002.
 
19
P. Kermani and L. Kleinrock. Virtual cut-through: A new computer communication switching technique. Computer Networks, 3:267--286, 1979.
 
20
21
 
22
23
 
24
 
25
A. Kovsh, I. Krestnikov, D. Livshits, S. Mikhrin, J. Weimert, and A. Zhukov. Quantum dot laser with 75nm broad spectrum of emission. Optics Letters, 32(7):793--795, 2007.
 
26
 
27
A. Kumar, P. Kundu, A. P. Singh, L.-S. Peh, and N. K. Jha. A 4.6tbits/s 3.6ghz single-cycle NoC router with a novel switch allocator in 65nm CMOS. In International Conference on Computer Design (ICCD), pages 63--70, Lake Tahoe, CA, 2007.
 
28
 
29
 
30
R. Narayanan, B. Ozisikyilmaz, J. Zambreno, G. Memik, and A. Choudhary. Minebench: A benchmark suite for data mining workloads. In IEEE International Symposium on Workload Characterization (IISCW), pages 182--188, San Jose, CA, 2006.
 
31
O.I.Dosunmu, M. K. Emsley, M. S. Unlu, D. DCannon, and L. C. Kimerling. High speed resonant cavity enhanced ge photodetectors on si reflecting substrates for 1550 nm operation. In IEEE International Topical Meeting on Microwave Photonics, 2004., pages 266--268, Ogunquit, ME, 2004.
 
32
L. Pavesi and D. J. Lockwood. Silicon photonics, 2004.
 
33
M. Petracca, K. Bergman, and L. Carloni. Photonic networks-on-chip: Opportunities and challenges. pages 2789--2792, Seattle, WA, May 2008.
 
34
T. Pinkston. Design considerations for optical interconnects in parallel computers. In Proc. of the First International Workshop on Massively Parallel Processing Using Optical Interconnections, pages 306--322, Cancun, Mexico, Apr. 1994.
35
 
36
J. Tatum. Vcsels for 10 gb/s optical interconnects. In IEEE Emerging Technologies Symposium on BroadBand Communications for the Internet Era, pages 58--61, Richardson, TX, 2001.
 
37
S. R. Vangal, J. Howard, G. Ruhl, S. Dighe, H. Wilson, J. Tschanz, D. Finan, A. Singh, T. Jacob, S. Jain, V. Erraguntla, C. Roberts, Y. Hoskote, N. Borkar, and S. Borkar. An 80-Tile sub-100-w teraflops processor in 65-nm cmos. Solid-State Circuits, IEEE Journal of, 43(1):29--41, 2008.
38
 
39
Y. Vlasov and S. McNab. Losses in single-mode silicon-on-insulator strip waveguides and bends. Optics Express, 12(8):1622--1631, 2004.
40
 
41
Q. Xu, S. Manipatruni, B. Schmidt, J. Shakya, and M. Lipson. 12.5 gbit/s carrier-injection-based silicon micro-ring silicon modulators. Opt. Express, 15(2):430--436, Jan. 2007.
 
42
T. Yin, R. Cohen, M. M. Morse, G. Sarid, Y. Chetrit, D. Rubin, and M. J. Paniccia. 40gb/s ge-on-soi waveguide photodetectors by selective ge growth. In Conference on Optical Fiber communication/National Fiber Optic Engineers Conference (OFC/NFOEC), pages 24--28, San Diego, CA, 2008.


Collaborative Colleagues:
Yan Pan: colleagues
Prabhat Kumar: colleagues
John Kim: colleagues
Gokhan Memik: colleagues
Yu Zhang: colleagues
Alok Choudhary: colleagues