ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
DRAM errors in the wild: a large-scale field study
Full text PdfPdf (535 KB)
Source
Joint International Conference on Measurement and Modeling of Computer Systems archive
Proceedings of the eleventh international joint conference on Measurement and modeling of computer systems table of contents
Seattle, WA, USA
SESSION: Memory and storage table of contents
Pages 193-204  
Year of Publication: 2009
ISBN:978-1-60558-511-6
Authors
Bianca Schroeder  University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
Eduardo Pinheiro  Google Inc., Mountain View, CA, USA
Wolf-Dietrich Weber  Google Inc., Mountain View, CA, USA
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGMETRICS: ACM Special Interest Group on Measurement and Evaluation
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 189,   Downloads (12 Months): 339,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1555349.1555372
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Errors in dynamic random access memory (DRAM) are a common form of hardware failure in modern compute clusters. Failures are costly both in terms of hardware replacement costs and service disruption. While a large body of work exists on DRAM in laboratory conditions, little has been reported on real DRAM failures in large production clusters. In this paper, we analyze measurements of memory errors in a large fleet of commodity servers over a period of 2.5 years. The collected data covers multiple vendors, DRAM capacities and technologies, and comprises many millions of DIMM days.

The goal of this paper is to answer questions such as the following: How common are memory errors in practice? What are their statistical properties? How are they affected by external factors, such as temperature and utilization, and by chip-specific factors, such as chip density, memory technology and DIMM age?

We find that DRAM error behavior in the field differs in many key aspects from commonly held assumptions. For example, we observe DRAM error rates that are orders of magnitude higher than previously reported, with 25,000 to 70,000 errors per billion device hours per Mbit and more than 8% of DIMMs affected by errors per year. We provide strong evidence that memory errors are dominated by hard errors, rather than soft errors, which previous work suspects to be the dominant error mode. We find that temperature, known to strongly impact DIMM error rates in lab conditions, has a surprisingly small effect on error behavior in the field, when taking all other factors into account. Finally, unlike commonly feared, we don't observe any indication that newer generations of DIMMs have worse error behavior.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Mosys adds soft-error protection, correction. Semiconductor Business News, 28 Jan. 2002.
 
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
T. Hamamoto, S. Sugiura, and S. Sawada. On the retention time distribution of dynamic random access memory (dram). IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, 45(6):1300--1309, 1998.
 
9
A. H. Johnston. Scaling and technology issues for soft error rates. In Proc. of the 4th Annual Conf. on Reliability, 2000.
 
10
 
11
T. C. May and M. H. Woods. Alpha-particle-induced soft errors in dynamic memories. IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, 26(1), 1979.
 
12
T. C. May and M. H. Woods. Alpha-particle-induced soft errors in dynamic memories. IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, 26(1), 1979.
13
 
14
 
15
 
16
E. Normand. Single event upset at ground level. IEEE Transaction on Nuclear Sciences, 6(43):2742--2750, 1996.
 
17
 
18
 
19
 
20
 
21
 
22
 
23
J. F. Ziegler and W. A. Lanford. Effect of Cosmic Rays on Computer Memories. Science, 206:776--788, 1979.

Collaborative Colleagues:
Bianca Schroeder: colleagues
Eduardo Pinheiro: colleagues
Wolf-Dietrich Weber: colleagues