| Opportunistic spectrum access in cognitive radio networks: when to turn off the spectrum sensors |
| Full text |
Pdf
(187 KB)
|
| Source
|
ACM International Conference Proceeding Series
archive
Proceedings of the 4th Annual International Conference on Wireless Internet
table of contents
Maui, Hawaii
SESSION: Cognitive radio networks
table of contents
Article No. 13
Year of Publication: 2008
ISBN:978-963-9799-36-3
|
|
Authors
|
|
Dan Xu
|
University of California, Davis, CA
|
|
Xin Liu
|
University of California, Davis, CA
|
|
| Sponsors |
|
| Publisher |
|
| Bibliometrics |
Downloads (6 Weeks): 39, Downloads (12 Months): 92, Citation Count: 0
|
|
|
ABSTRACT
In cognitive radio networks, spectrum sensing is a critical to both protecting the primary users and creating spectrum access opportunities of secondary users. Channel sensing itself, including active probing and passive listening, often incurs cost, in terms of time overhead, energy consumption, or intrusion to primary users. It is thus not desirable to sense the channel arbitrarily. In this paper, we are motivated to consider the following problem. A secondary user, equipped with spectrum sensors, dynamically accesses a channel. If it transmits without/with colliding with primary users, a certain reward/penalty is obtained. If it senses the channel, accurate channel information is obtained, but a given channel sensing cost incurs. The third option for the user is to turn off the sensor/transmitter and go to sleep mode, where no cost/gain incurs. So when should the secondary user transmit, sense, or sleep, to maximize the total gain? We derive the optimal transmitting, sensing, and sleeping structure, which is a threshold-based policy. Our work sheds light on designing sensing and transmitting scheduling protocols for cognitive radio networks, especially the in-band sensing mechanism in 802.22 networks.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
| |
1
|
IEEE 802.22 WRAN WG, www.ieee802.org/22/.
|
| |
2
|
S. Haykin. Cognitive radio: Brain-empowered wireless communications. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications., 23(2):201--220, Febraury 2005.
|
| |
3
|
R. W. Thomas, L. A. DaSilva, A. B. MacKenzie, Cognitive networks, In IEEE DySPAN 2005.
|
 |
4
|
|
| |
5
|
|
 |
6
|
|
| |
7
|
P. Wang, L. Xiao, S. Zhou, and J. Wang. Optimization of detection time for channel efficiency in cognitive radio systems. In IEEE WCNC 2007.
|
| |
8
|
Y.-C. Liang, Y. Zeng, E. Peh, and A. T. Hoang. Sensing-throughput tradeoff for cognitive radio networks. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications., vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 1326C1337, April 2008.
|
| |
9
|
S. Huang, X. Liu and Z. Ding. Optimal Sensing-Transmission Structure for Dynamic Spectrum Access. available at http://www.cs.ucdavis.edu/liu/preprint/huangsensing.pdf.
|
 |
10
|
|
| |
11
|
Y. Chen, Q. Zhao, and A. Swami. Distributed Spectrum Sensing and Access in Cognitive Radio Networks with Energy Constraint. To appear in IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.
|
| |
12
|
Q. Zhao, L. Tong, A. Swami, and Y. Chen. Decentralized cognitive MAC for opportunistic spectrum access in ad hoc networks: A POMDP framework. In IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications (JSAC): Special Issue on Adaptive, Spectrum Agile and Cognitive Wireles Networks, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 589C600, 2007.
|
| |
13
|
Y. Chen, Q. Zhao, and A. Swami. Joint design and separation principle for opportunistic spectrum access in the presence of sensing errors. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, vol. 54, no. 5, pp. 2053C 2071, 2008.
|
|