ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Robot assisted localization of sensor networks guided by rigidity
Full text PdfPdf (175 KB)
Source ACM International Conference Proceeding Series archive
Proceedings of the 4th Annual International Conference on Wireless Internet table of contents
Maui, Hawaii
SESSION: Wireless sensor networks I table of contents
Article No. 8  
Year of Publication: 2008
ISBN:978-963-9799-36-3
Authors
Saroja Kanchi  Flint, MI
Changhua Wu  Flint, MI
Sponsors
: ICST
: Intel
: XIRRUS
Publisher
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 11,   Downloads (12 Months): 17,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  

ABSTRACT

In this paper, we propose a robot assisted localization guided by rigidity checking. For a network to be localizable, it must be rigid, which means given the existing edge constraints, there is only one location for each node in it. Many networks, however, are not rigid. To localize these nonrigid network, a robot can be used to add additional distance measure between nodes so that the network becomes rigid and localizable. To facilitate the localization and reduce the travel cost of the robot, the rigid subregions of the network are first identified. The identification of rigid subregions provides a guide for the movement of robots. A brief introduction to rigidity theory is presented in this paper. Experiments that evaluate the performance of the proposed approach are presented. The experimental results prove that the proposed approach is sound and gives excellent results compared to previous approaches for localization.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
I. Akyildiz, W. Su, Y. Sankarasubramaniam, and E. Cayirci. A survey on sensor networks. IEEE Commun. Mag., 40:102--114, 2002.
 
2
N. Bulusu, J. Heidemann, and D. Estrin. GPS-less low cost outdoor localization for very small devices. Technical Report 00-729, Computer science department, University of Southern California, Los Angles, CA, 2000.
 
3
T. Eren, D. Goldenberg, W. Whitley, Y. Yang, A. Morse, B. Anderson, and P. Belheumer. Rigidity, computation, and randomization of network localization, 2004.
 
4
D. Goldenberg, A. Krishnamurthy, W. Maness, R. Yang, A. Young, and A. Savvides. Network localization in partially localizable networks. In Proceedings of INFOCOM 2005.
5
 
6
 
7
G. Laman. On graphs and rigidity of plane skeletal structures. Journal of Engineering Mathematics, pages 331--340, 4 1970.
8
9
 
10
N. B. Priyantha, H. Balakrishnan, E. D. Demaine, and S. Teller. Mobile-assisted localization in wireless sensor networks. In IEEE Conference on Computer Communications (InfoCom05), 2005.
 
11
C. Savarese, J. Rabaey, and J. Beutel. Locationing in distributed ad hoc wireless sensor networks. In Proc. 2001 Int'l Conf. Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing (ICASSP 2001), volume 4, pages 2037--2040, May 2001.
 
12
S. N. Simic and S. Sastry. Distributed environmental monitoring using random sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Information Processing in Sensor Networks, pages 582--592, 2003.
 
13
C. Wu, W. Sheng, and Y. Zhang. Mobile self-localization using multi-dimensional scaling in robotic sensor networks. The International Journal of Intelligent Control and Systems, 11(3), September 2006.
 
14

Collaborative Colleagues:
Saroja Kanchi: colleagues
Changhua Wu: colleagues