| Online learning by ellipsoid method |
| Full text |
Pdf
(653 KB)
|
| Source
|
ACM International Conference Proceeding Series; Vol. 382
archive
Proceedings of the 26th Annual International Conference on Machine Learning
table of contents
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Pages 1153-1160
Year of Publication: 2009
ISBN:978-1-60558-516-1
|
|
Authors
|
|
Liu Yang
|
Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA
|
|
Rong Jin
|
Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI
|
|
Jieping Ye
|
Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ
|
|
| Sponsors |
|
| Publisher |
|
| Bibliometrics |
Downloads (6 Weeks): 9, Downloads (12 Months): 36, Citation Count: 0
|
|
|
ABSTRACT
In this work, we extend the ellipsoid method, which was originally designed for convex optimization, for online learning. The key idea is to approximate by an ellipsoid the classification hypotheses that are consistent with all the training examples received so far. This is in contrast to most online learning algorithms where only a single classifier is maintained at each iteration. Efficient algorithms are presented for updating both the centroid and the positive definite matrix of ellipsoid given a misclassified example. In addition to the classical ellipsoid method, an improved version for online learning is also presented. Mistake bounds for both ellipsoid methods are derived. Evaluation with the USPS dataset and three UCI data-sets shows encouraging results when comparing the proposed online learning algorithm to two state-of-the-art online learners.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
| |
1
|
Amit, Y., Shalev-Shwartz, S., & Singer, Y. (2007). Online classification for complex problems using simultaneous projections. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (pp. 17--24).
|
| |
2
|
Crammer, K. (2004). Online learning of complex categorial problems. Doctoral dissertation, Hebrew Univeristy of Jerusalem.
|
| |
3
|
|
| |
4
|
|
| |
5
|
|
 |
6
|
Michael Fink , Shai Shalev-Shwartz , Yoram Singer , Shimon Ullman, Online multiclass learning by interclass hypothesis sharing, Proceedings of the 23rd international conference on Machine learning, p.313-320, June 25-29, 2006, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
[doi> 10.1145/1143844.1143884]
|
| |
7
|
|
| |
8
|
|
| |
9
|
|
 |
10
|
|
| |
11
|
|
| |
12
|
Kivinen, J., Smola, A. J., & C. Williamson, R. (2002). Online learning with kernels. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 52, 2165--2176.
|
| |
13
|
|
| |
14
|
|
| |
15
|
Rosenblatt, F. (1958). The perceptron: A probabilistic model for information storage and organization in the brain. Psychological Review, 65, 386--407.
|
| |
16
|
Shalev-Shwartz, S., & Singer, Y. (2006). Online learning meets optimization in the dual. Proc. of the 19th Annual Conf. on Learning Theory (pp. 423--437).
|
| |
17
|
Shor, N. (1977). Cut-off method with space extension in convex programming problems. Cybernetics, 12, 94--94.
|
|