ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Learning structurally consistent undirected probabilistic graphical models
Full text PdfPdf (730 KB)
Source ACM International Conference Proceeding Series; Vol. 382 archive
Proceedings of the 26th Annual International Conference on Machine Learning table of contents
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Pages 905-912  
Year of Publication: 2009
ISBN:978-1-60558-516-1
Authors
Sushmita Roy  University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM
Terran Lane  University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM
Margaret Werner-Washburne  University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM
Sponsors
: MITACS
: NSF
Microsoft Research : Microsoft Research
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 14,   Downloads (12 Months): 29,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1553374.1553490
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

In many real-world domains, undirected graphical models such as Markov random fields provide a more natural representation of the statistical dependency structure than directed graphical models. Unfortunately, structure learning of undirected graphs using likelihood-based scores remains difficult because of the intractability of computing the partition function. We describe a new Markov random field structure learning algorithm, motivated by canonical parameterization of Abbeel et al. We provide computational improvements on their parameterization by learning per-variable canonical factors, which makes our algorithm suitable for domains with hundreds of nodes. We compare our algorithm against several algorithms for learning undirected and directed models on simulated and real datasets from biology. Our algorithm frequently outperforms existing algorithms, producing higher-quality structures, suggesting that enforcing consistency during structure learning is beneficial for learning undirected graphs.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
Aragon, A. D., Rodriguez, A. L., Meirelles, O. et al. (2008). Characterization of differentiated quiescent and nonquiescent cells in yeast stationary-phase cultures. Mol. Biol. Cell, E07-07-0666+.
 
3
Besag, J. (1977). Efficiency of pseudolikelihood estimation for simple gaussian fields. Biometrika, 64, 616--618.
 
4
 
5
Friedman, N., Nachman, I., & Pe'er, D. (1999). Learning bayesian network structure from massive datasets: The sparse candidate algorithm. Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (pp. 206--215).
 
6
 
7
 
8
Lauritzen, S. L. (1996). Graphical models. Oxford Statistical Science Series. New York, USA: Oxford University Press.
 
9
Lee, S.-I., Ganapathi, V., & Koller, D. (2007). Efficient structure learning of markov networks using l1-regularization. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 19 (pp. 817--824). MIT Press.
 
10
Li, F., & Yang, Y. (2005). Using modified lasso regression to learn large undirected graphs in a probabilistic framework. American Association for Artificial Intelligence (pp. 801--806).
 
11
Margolin, A., Nemenman, I., Basso, K. et al. (2005). Aracne: An algorithm for the reconstruction of gene regulatory networks in a mammalian cellular context. BMC Bioinformatics, (Suppl 1): S7.
 
12
Paget, R. D. (1999). Nonparametric markov random field models for natural texture images. Doctoral dissertation, University of Queensland.
 
13
 
14
Schmidt, M., Niculescu-Mizil, A., & Murphy, K. (2007). Learning graphical model structure using l1-regularization paths. 22nd international conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 1278--1283).

Collaborative Colleagues:
Sushmita Roy: colleagues
Terran Lane: colleagues
Margaret Werner-Washburne: colleagues