ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Learning from measurements in exponential families
Full text PdfPdf (768 KB)
Source ACM International Conference Proceeding Series; Vol. 382 archive
Proceedings of the 26th Annual International Conference on Machine Learning table of contents
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Pages 641-648  
Year of Publication: 2009
ISBN:978-1-60558-516-1
Authors
Percy Liang  University of California, Berkeley, CA
Michael I. Jordan  University of California, Berkeley, CA
Dan Klein  University of California, Berkeley, CA
Sponsors
: MITACS
: NSF
Microsoft Research : Microsoft Research
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 18,   Downloads (12 Months): 33,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1553374.1553457
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Given a model family and a set of unlabeled examples, one could either label specific examples or state general constraints---both provide information about the desired model. In general, what is the most cost-effective way to learn? To address this question, we introduce measurements, a general class of mechanisms for providing information about a target model. We present a Bayesian decision-theoretic framework, which allows us to both integrate diverse measurements and choose new measurements to make. We use a variational inference algorithm, which exploits exponential family duality. The merits of our approach are demonstrated on two sequence labeling tasks.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Borwein, J. M., & Zhu, Q. J. (2005). Techniques of variational analysis. Springer.
 
2
Chaloner, K., & Verdinelli, I. (1995). Bayesian experimental design: A review. Statistical Science, 10, 273--304.
 
3
Chang, M., Ratinov, L., & Roth, D. (2007). Guiding semi-supervision with constraint-driven learning. Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL) (pp. 280--287).
4
 
5
 
6
Graça, J., Ganchev, K., & Taskar, B. (2008). Expectation maximization and posterior constraints. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS) (pp. 569--576).
 
7
 
8
9
 
10
Mann, G., & McCallum, A. (2008). Generalized expectation criteria for semi-supervised learning of conditional random fields. Human Language Technology and Association for Computational Linguistics (HLT/ACL) (pp. 870--878).
11
 
12
13

Collaborative Colleagues:
Percy Liang: colleagues
Michael I. Jordan: colleagues
Dan Klein: colleagues