| EigenTransfer: a unified framework for transfer learning |
| Full text |
Pdf
(874 KB)
|
| Source
|
ACM International Conference Proceeding Series; Vol. 382
archive
Proceedings of the 26th Annual International Conference on Machine Learning
table of contents
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Pages 193-200
Year of Publication: 2009
ISBN:978-1-60558-516-1
|
|
Authors
|
|
Wenyuan Dai
|
Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
|
|
Ou Jin
|
Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
|
|
Gui-Rong Xue
|
Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
|
|
Qiang Yang
|
Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Clear Water Bay, Hong Kong
|
|
Yong Yu
|
Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
|
|
| Sponsors |
|
| Publisher |
|
| Bibliometrics |
Downloads (6 Weeks): 19, Downloads (12 Months): 55, Citation Count: 0
|
|
|
ABSTRACT
This paper proposes a general framework, called EigenTransfer, to tackle a variety of transfer learning problems, e.g. cross-domain learning, self-taught learning, etc. Our basic idea is to construct a graph to represent the target transfer learning task. By learning the spectra of a graph which represents a learning task, we obtain a set of eigenvectors that reflect the intrinsic structure of the task graph. These eigenvectors can be used as the new features which transfer the knowledge from auxiliary data to help classify target data. Given an arbitrary non-transfer learner (e.g. SVM) and a particular transfer learning task, EigenTransfer can produce a transfer learner accordingly for the target transfer learning task. We apply EigenTransfer on three different transfer learning tasks, cross-domain learning, cross-category learning and self-taught learning, to demonstrate its unifying ability, and show through experiments that EigenTransfer can greatly outperform several representative non-transfer learners.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
 |
1
|
Bernhard E. Boser , Isabelle M. Guyon , Vladimir N. Vapnik, A training algorithm for optimal margin classifiers, Proceedings of the fifth annual workshop on Computational learning theory, p.144-152, July 27-29, 1992, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
[doi> 10.1145/130385.130401]
|
| |
2
|
|
| |
3
|
Chung, F. R. K. (1997). Spectral Graph Theory. American Mathematical Society.
|
| |
4
|
Daumé III, H., & Marcu, D. (2006). Domain adaptation for statistical classifiers. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 26, 101--126.
|
| |
5
|
William Hersh , Chris Buckley , T. J. Leone , David Hickam, OHSUMED: an interactive retrieval evaluation and new large test collection for research, Proceedings of the 17th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval, p.192-201, July 03-06, 1994, Dublin, Ireland
|
| |
6
|
|
| |
7
|
Lang, K. (1995). Newsweeder: Learning to filter netnews. Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Machine Learning (pp. 331--339).
|
| |
8
|
|
 |
9
|
Rajat Raina , Alexis Battle , Honglak Lee , Benjamin Packer , Andrew Y. Ng, Self-taught learning: transfer learning from unlabeled data, Proceedings of the 24th international conference on Machine learning, p.759-766, June 20-24, 2007, Corvalis, Oregon
[doi> 10.1145/1273496.1273592]
|
 |
10
|
|
| |
11
|
Rosenstein, M. T., Marx, Z., Kaelbling, L. P., & Dietterich, T. G. (2005). To transfer or not to transfer. NIPS 2005 Workshop on Transfer Learning.
|
| |
12
|
Saad, Y. (1992). Numerical methods for large eigenvalue problems. Oxford rd, Manchester, UK.
|
| |
13
|
|
| |
14
|
Thrun, S. (1996). Is learning the n-th thing any easier than learning the first? Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 8 (pp. 640--646).
|
 |
15
|
|
|