| Structure learning of Bayesian networks using constraints |
| Full text |
Pdf
(686 KB)
|
| Source
|
ACM International Conference Proceeding Series; Vol. 382
archive
Proceedings of the 26th Annual International Conference on Machine Learning
table of contents
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Pages 113-120
Year of Publication: 2009
ISBN:978-1-60558-516-1
|
|
Authors
|
|
Cassio P. de Campos
|
Dalle Molle Institute for Artificial Intelligence (IDSIA), Switzerland
|
|
Zhi Zeng
|
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (RPI), Troy NY
|
|
Qiang Ji
|
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (RPI), Troy NY
|
|
| Sponsors |
|
| Publisher |
|
| Bibliometrics |
Downloads (6 Weeks): 16, Downloads (12 Months): 60, Citation Count: 0
|
|
|
ABSTRACT
This paper addresses exact learning of Bayesian network structure from data and expert's knowledge based on score functions that are decomposable. First, it describes useful properties that strongly reduce the time and memory costs of many known methods such as hill-climbing, dynamic programming and sampling variable orderings. Secondly, a branch and bound algorithm is presented that integrates parameter and structural constraints with data in a way to guarantee global optimality with respect to the score function. It is an any-time procedure because, if stopped, it provides the best current solution and an estimation about how far it is from the global solution. We show empirically the advantages of the properties and the constraints, and the applicability of the algorithm to large data sets (up to one hundred variables) that cannot be handled by other current methods (limited to around 30 variables).
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
| |
1
|
Asuncion, A., & Newman, D. (2007). UCI machine learning repository. http://www.ics.uci.edu/~mlearn/MLRepository.html.
|
| |
2
|
|
| |
3
|
Bouckaert, R. (1994). Properties of bayesian belief network learning algorithms. Conf. on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (pp. 102--109). M. Kaufmann.
|
| |
4
|
Chickering, D., Meek, C., & Heckerman, D. (2003). Large-sample learning of bayesian networks is np-hard. Conf. on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (pp. 124--13). M. Kaufmann.
|
| |
5
|
|
| |
6
|
|
| |
7
|
|
| |
8
|
Koivisto, M. (2006). Advances in exact bayesian structure discovery in bayesian networks. Conf. on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (pp. 241--248) AUAI Press.
|
| |
9
|
|
| |
10
|
Silander, T., & Myllymaki, P. (2006). A simple approach for finding the globally optimal bayesian network structure. Conf. on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence. (pp. 445--452) AUAI Press.
|
| |
11
|
Singh, A. P., & Moore, A. W. (2005). Finding optimal bayesian networks by dynamic programming (Technical Report). Carnegie Mellon Univ. CALD-05-106.
|
| |
12
|
Suzuki, J. (1996). Learning bayesian belief networks based on the minimum description length principle: An efficient algorithm using the B&B technique. Int. Conf. on Machine Learning (pp. 462--470).
|
| |
13
|
Teyssier, M., & Koller, D. (2005). Ordering-based search: A simple and effective algorithm for learning bayesian networks. Conf. on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence. (pp. 584--590) AUAI Press.
|
| |
14
|
|
| |
15
|
|
|