ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Structure learning of Bayesian networks using constraints
Full text PdfPdf (686 KB)
Source ACM International Conference Proceeding Series; Vol. 382 archive
Proceedings of the 26th Annual International Conference on Machine Learning table of contents
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Pages 113-120  
Year of Publication: 2009
ISBN:978-1-60558-516-1
Authors
Cassio P. de Campos  Dalle Molle Institute for Artificial Intelligence (IDSIA), Switzerland
Zhi Zeng  Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (RPI), Troy NY
Qiang Ji  Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (RPI), Troy NY
Sponsors
: MITACS
: NSF
Microsoft Research : Microsoft Research
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 16,   Downloads (12 Months): 60,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1553374.1553389
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

This paper addresses exact learning of Bayesian network structure from data and expert's knowledge based on score functions that are decomposable. First, it describes useful properties that strongly reduce the time and memory costs of many known methods such as hill-climbing, dynamic programming and sampling variable orderings. Secondly, a branch and bound algorithm is presented that integrates parameter and structural constraints with data in a way to guarantee global optimality with respect to the score function. It is an any-time procedure because, if stopped, it provides the best current solution and an estimation about how far it is from the global solution. We show empirically the advantages of the properties and the constraints, and the applicability of the algorithm to large data sets (up to one hundred variables) that cannot be handled by other current methods (limited to around 30 variables).


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Asuncion, A., & Newman, D. (2007). UCI machine learning repository. http://www.ics.uci.edu/~mlearn/MLRepository.html.
 
2
 
3
Bouckaert, R. (1994). Properties of bayesian belief network learning algorithms. Conf. on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (pp. 102--109). M. Kaufmann.
 
4
Chickering, D., Meek, C., & Heckerman, D. (2003). Large-sample learning of bayesian networks is np-hard. Conf. on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (pp. 124--13). M. Kaufmann.
 
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
Koivisto, M. (2006). Advances in exact bayesian structure discovery in bayesian networks. Conf. on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (pp. 241--248) AUAI Press.
 
9
 
10
Silander, T., & Myllymaki, P. (2006). A simple approach for finding the globally optimal bayesian network structure. Conf. on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence. (pp. 445--452) AUAI Press.
 
11
Singh, A. P., & Moore, A. W. (2005). Finding optimal bayesian networks by dynamic programming (Technical Report). Carnegie Mellon Univ. CALD-05-106.
 
12
Suzuki, J. (1996). Learning bayesian belief networks based on the minimum description length principle: An efficient algorithm using the B&B technique. Int. Conf. on Machine Learning (pp. 462--470).
 
13
Teyssier, M., & Koller, D. (2005). Ordering-based search: A simple and effective algorithm for learning bayesian networks. Conf. on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence. (pp. 584--590) AUAI Press.
 
14
 
15

Collaborative Colleagues:
Cassio P. de Campos: colleagues
Zhi Zeng: colleagues
Qiang Ji: colleagues