ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Digital Library logoTake a look at the new version of this page: [ beta version ]. Tell us what you think.
Optimized expected information gain for nonlinear dynamical systems
Full text PdfPdf (659 KB)
Source ACM International Conference Proceeding Series; Vol. 382 archive
Proceedings of the 26th Annual International Conference on Machine Learning table of contents
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Pages: 97-104  
Year of Publication: 2009
ISBN:978-1-60558-516-1
Authors
Alberto Giovanni Busetto  ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland and Competence Center for Systems Physiology and Metabolic Diseases, Zurich, Switzerland and Life Science Zurich PhD Program on Systems Biology of Complex Diseases
Cheng Soon Ong  ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
Joachim M. Buhmann  ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland and Competence Center for Systems Physiology and Metabolic Diseases, Zurich, Switzerland
Sponsors
: MITACS
: NSF
Microsoft Research : Microsoft Research
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 3,   Downloads (12 Months): 33,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1553374.1553387
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

This paper addresses the problem of active model selection for nonlinear dynamical systems. We propose a novel learning approach that selects the most informative subset of time-dependent variables for the purpose of Bayesian model inference. The model selection criterion maximizes the expected Kullback-Leibler divergence between the prior and the posterior probabilities over the models. The proposed strategy generalizes the standard D-optimal design, which is obtained from a uniform prior with Gaussian noise. In addition, our approach allows us to determine an information halting criterion for model identification. We illustrate the benefits of our approach by differentiating between 18 published biochemical models of the TOR signaling pathway, a model selection problem in systems biology. By generating pivotal selection experiments, our strategy outperforms the standard Aoptimal, D-optimal and E-optimal sequential design techniques.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Baldi, P., & Itti, L. (2005). Attention: bits versus wows. Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. on Neural Networks and Brain, Beijing, China (pp. PL56--PL61).
 
2
Banga, J. R., & Balsa-Canto, E. (2008). Parameter estimation and optimal experimental design. Essays in Biochemistry, 45, 195--209.
 
3
 
4
Busetto, A. G., & Buhmann, J. M. (2009). Structure identification by optimized interventions. Journal of Machine Learning Research Proceedings of the Int. Conf. on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, Clear-water Beach, Florida USA (pp. 49--56).
 
5
Chaloner, K., & Verdinelli, I. (1995). Bayesian experimental design: a review. Statistical Science, 10, 273--304.
 
6
Heine, T., Kawohla, M., & King, R. (2008). Derivative-free optimal experimental design. Chemical Engineering Science, Model-Based Experimental Analysis, 63, 4873--4880.
 
7
Kitano, H. (2002). Computational systems biology. Nature, 420, 206--210.
 
8
Kitano, H., Funahashi, A., Matsuoka, Y., & Oda, K. (2005). Using process diagrams for the graphical representation of biological networks. Nature Biotechnology, 23, 961--966.
 
9
Kuepfer, L., Peter, M., Sauer, U., & Stelling, J. (2007). Ensemble modeling for analysis of cell signaling dynamics. Nature Biotechnology, 25, 1001--1006.
 
10
 
11
van den Berg, J., Curtis, A., & Trampert, J. (2003). Optimal nonlinear Bayesian experimental design: an application to amplitude versus offset experiments. Geophysical Journal Int., 155, 411--421.
 
12
Wagner, A. (2005). Robustness and evolvability in living systems (Princeton studies in complexity). Princeton University Press.

Collaborative Colleagues:
Alberto Giovanni Busetto: colleagues
Cheng Soon Ong: colleagues
Joachim M. Buhmann: colleagues