| Tractable nonparametric Bayesian inference in Poisson processes with Gaussian process intensities |
| Full text |
Pdf
(799 KB)
|
| Source
|
ACM International Conference Proceeding Series; Vol. 382
archive
Proceedings of the 26th Annual International Conference on Machine Learning
table of contents
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Pages 9-16
Year of Publication: 2009
ISBN:978-1-60558-516-1
|
|
Authors
|
|
| Sponsors |
|
| Publisher |
|
| Bibliometrics |
Downloads (6 Weeks): 17, Downloads (12 Months): 45, Citation Count: 0
|
|
|
ABSTRACT
The inhomogeneous Poisson process is a point process that has varying intensity across its domain (usually time or space). For nonparametric Bayesian modeling, the Gaussian process is a useful way to place a prior distribution on this intensity. The combination of a Poisson process and GP is known as a Gaussian Cox process, or doubly-stochastic Poisson process. Likelihood-based inference in these models requires an intractable integral over an infinite-dimensional random function. In this paper we present the first approach to Gaussian Cox processes in which it is possible to perform inference without introducing approximations or finitedimensional proxy distributions. We call our method the Sigmoidal Gaussian Cox Process, which uses a generative model for Poisson data to enable tractable inference via Markov chain Monte Carlo. We compare our methods to competing methods on synthetic data and apply it to several real-world data sets.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
| |
1
|
Adams, R. P., Murray, I., & MacKay, D. J. C. (2009). The Gaussian process density sampler. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 21 (pp. 9--16).
|
| |
2
|
Cox, D. R. (1955). Some statistical methods connected with series of events. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 17, 129--164.
|
 |
3
|
|
| |
4
|
Cunningham, J., Yu, B., Shenoy, K., & Sahani, M. (2008b). Inferring neural firing rates from spike trains using Gaussian processes. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 20 (pp. 329--336).
|
| |
5
|
Diggle, P. (1985). A kernel method for smoothing point process data. Applied Statistics, 34, 138--147.
|
| |
6
|
Duane, S., Kennedy, A. D., Pendleton, B. J., & Roweth, D. (1987). Hybrid Monte Carlo. Physics Letters B, 195, 216--222.
|
| |
7
|
Gregory, P. C., & Loredo, T. J. (1992). A new method for the detection of a periodic signal of unknown shape and period. The Astrophysical Journal, 398, 146--168.
|
| |
8
|
Heikkinen, J., & Arjas, E. (1999). Modeling a Poisson forest in variable elevations: a nonparametric Bayesian approach. Biometrics, 55, 738--745.
|
| |
9
|
Jarrett, R. G. (1979). A note on the intervals between coal-mining disasters. Biometrika, 66, 191--193.
|
| |
10
|
Kottas, A., & Sansóó, B. (2007). Bayesian mixture modeling for spatial Poisson process intensities, with applications to extreme value analysis. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 137, 3151--3163.
|
| |
11
|
Lewis, P. A. W., & Shedler, G. S. (1979). Simulation of a nonhomogeneous Poisson process by thinning. Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, 26, 403--413.
|
| |
12
|
Møller, J., Syversveen, A. R., & Waagepetersen, R. P. (1998). Log Gaussian Cox processes. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 25, 451--482.
|
| |
13
|
Murray, I., Ghahramani, Z., & MacKay, D. (2006). MCMC for doubly-intractable distributions. Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence 22 (pp. 359--366).
|
| |
14
|
|
| |
15
|
Rathbun, S. L., & Cressie, N. (1994). Asymptotic properties of estimators for the parameters of spatial inhomogeneous Poisson point processes. Advances in Applied Probability, 26, 122--154.
|
| |
16
|
Ripley, B. D. (1977). Modelling spatial patterns. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 39, 172--212.
|
|