ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Self-stabilizing robot formations over unreliable networks
Full text PdfPdf (482 KB)
Source
ACM Transactions on Autonomous and Adaptive Systems (TAAS) archive
Volume 4 ,  Issue 3  (July 2009) table of contents
Article No. 17  
Year of Publication: 2009
ISSN:1556-4665
Authors
Seth Gilbert  Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale, Lausanne
Nancy Lynch  Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Sayan Mitra  University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Tina Nolte  Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 42,   Downloads (12 Months): 111,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

appendices and supplements   abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1552297.1552300
What is a DOI?

APPENDICES and SUPPLEMENTS
Online appendix to self-stabilizing robot formations over unreliable networks. The appendix supports the information on article 17.


ABSTRACT

We describe how a set of mobile robots can arrange themselves on any specified curve on the plane in the presence of dynamic changes both in the underlying ad hoc network and in the set of participating robots. Our strategy is for the mobile robots to implement a self-stabilizing virtual layer consisting of mobile client nodes, stationary Virtual Nodes (VNs), and local broadcast communication. The VNs are associated with predetermined regions in the plane and coordinate among themselves to distribute the client nodes relatively uniformly among the VNs' regions. Each VN directs its local client nodes to align themselves on the local portion of the target curve. The resulting motion coordination protocol is self-stabilizing, in that each robot can begin the execution in any arbitrary state and at any arbitrary location in the plane. In addition, self-stabilization ensures that the robots can adapt to changes in the desired target formation.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Ando, H., Oasa, Y., Suzuki, I., and Yamashita, M. 1999. Distributed memoryless point convergence algorithm for mobile robots with limited visibility. IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom. 15, 5, 818--828.
 
2
Blondel, V., Hendrickx, J., Olshevsky, A., and Tsitsiklis, J. 2005. Convergence in multi-agent coordination consensus and flocking. In Proceedings of the Joint 44th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control and European Control Conference. 2996--3000.
 
3
Brown, M. D. 2007. Air traffic control using virtual stationary automata. M.S. thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
 
4
5
 
6
Clavaski, S., Chaves, M., Day, R., Nag, P., Williams, A., and Zhang, W. 2003. Vehicle networks: Achieving regular formation. In Proceedings of the American Control Conference.
 
7
Cortes, J., Martinez, S., Karatas, T., and Bullo, F. 2004. Coverage control for mobile sensing networks. IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom. 20, 2, 243--255.
8
 
9
 
10
11
 
12
Dolev, S., Gilbert, S., Lahiani, L., Lynch, N. A., and Nolte, T. A. 2005b. Virtual stationary automata for mobile networks. Tech. rep. MIT-LCS-TR-979.
 
13
Dolev, S., Gilbert, S., Lynch, N., Shvartsman, A., and Welch, J. 2003. Geoquorums: Implementing atomic memory in ad hoc networks. In Distributed Algorithms, F. E. Fich, Ed. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 2848. 306--320.
14
 
15
 
16
 
17
Fax, J. and Murray, R. 2004. Information flow and cooperative control of vehicle formations. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 49, 1465--1476.
 
18
Flocchini, P., Prencipe, G., Santoro, N., and Widmayer, P. 2001. Pattern formation by autonomous robots without chirality. In Proceedings of the Colloquium on Structural Information and Communication Complexity (SIROCCO). 147--162.
 
19
Gazi, V. and Passino, K. M. 2003. Stability analysis of swarms. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 48, 4, 692--697.
20
 
21
Herman, T. 1996. Self-stabilization bibliography: Access guide. Theoretical Comput. Sci.
 
22
Jadbabaie, A., Lin, J., and Morse, A. S. 2003. Coordination of groups of mobile autonomous agents using nearest neighbor rules. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 48, 6, 988--1001.
 
23
 
24
Lin, J., Morse, A., and Anderson., B. 2003. Multi-agent rendezvous problem. In Proceedings of the 42nd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.
 
25
Lynch, N., Mitra, S., and Nolte, T. 2005. Motion coordination using virtual nodes. In Proceedings of the 44th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC'05).
 
26
Martinez, S., Cortes, J., and Bullo, F. 2005. On robust rendezvous for mobile autonomous agents. In Proceedings of the IFAC World Congress.
 
27
Nolte, T. and Lynch, N. A. 2007a. Self-stabilization and virtual node layer emulations. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Self-Stablizing Systems (SSS). 394--408.
 
28
 
29
Nolte, T. A. 2008. Virtual stationary timed automata for mobile networks. Ph.D. thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge.
 
30
Olfati-Saber, R., Fax, J., and Murray, R. 2007. Consensus and cooperation in networked multi-agent systems. Proc. IEEE 95, 1, 215--233.
 
31
Prencipe, G. 2000. Achievable patterns by an even number of autonomous mobile robots. Tech. rep. TR-00-11. 17.
 
32
Prencipe, G. 2001. Corda: Distributed coordination of a set of autonomous mobile robots. In Proceedings of the European Research Seminar on Advances in Distributed Systems (ERSADS). 185--190.
 
33

Collaborative Colleagues:
Seth Gilbert: colleagues
Nancy Lynch: colleagues
Sayan Mitra: colleagues
Tina Nolte: colleagues