ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Complexity of wavelength assignment in optical network optimization
Full text PdfPdf (284 KB)
Source IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking (TON) archive
Volume 17 ,  Issue 2  (April 2009) table of contents
Pages 646-657  
Year of Publication: 2009
ISSN:1063-6692
Authors
Matthew Andrews  Bell Laboratories, Murray Hill, NJ
Lisa Zhang  Bell Laboratories, Murray Hill, NJ
Publisher
IEEE Press  Piscataway, NJ, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 20,   Downloads (12 Months): 56,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: 10.1109/TNET.2009.2014226

ABSTRACT

We study the complexity of a set of design problems for optical networks. Under wavelength division multiplexing (WDM) technology, demands sharing a common fiber are transported on distinct wavelengths. Multiple fibers may be deployed on a physical link.

Our basic goal is to design networks of minimum cost, minimum congestion and maximum throughput. This translates to three variants in the design objectives: 1) MIN-SUMFIBER: minimizing the total cost of fibers deployed to carry all demands; 2) MIN-MAXFIBER: minimizing the maximum number of fibers per link to carry all demands; and 3) MAX-THROUGHPUT: maximizing the carried demands using a given set of fibers.

We also have two variants in the design constraints: 1) CHOOSEROUTE: Here we need to specify both a routing path and a wavelength for each demand; 2) FIXEDROUTE: Here we are given demand routes and we need to specify wavelengths only. The FIXEDROUTE variant allows us to study wavelength assignment in isolation.

Combining these variants, we have six design problems. Previously we have shown that general instances of the problems MIN-SUMFIBER-CHOOSEROUTE and MIN-MAXFIBER-FIXEDROUTE have no constant-approximation algorithms. In this paper, we prove that a similar statement holds for all four other problems. Our main result shows that MIN-SUMFIBER-FIXEDROUTE cannot be approximated within any constant factor unless NP-hard problems have efficient algorithms. This, together with the previous hardness result of MIN-MAXFIBER-FIXEDROUTE, shows that the problem of wavelength assignment is inherently hard by itself.

We also study the complexity of problems that arise when multiple demands can be time-multiplexed onto a single wavelength (as in time-domain wavelength interleaved networking (TWIN) networks) and when wavelength converters can be placed along the path of a demand.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
M. Andrews and L. Zhang, "Wavelength assignment in optical networks with fixed fiber capacity," in Proc. 31st ICALP, Turke, Finland, Jul. 12-16, 2004, pp. 134-145.
 
2
M. Andrews and L. Zhang, "Bounds on fiber minimization in optical networks with fixed fiber capacity," in Proc. IEEE INFOCOM'05, Miami, FL, Mar. 13-17, 2005, pp. 409-419.
3
 
4
K. Kumaran, C. J. Nuzman, and I. Widjaja, "Wavelength assignment for partially transparent networks with reach constraints," J. Opt. Netw., vol. 2, no. 8, pp. 285-302, 2003.
 
5
S. Antonakopoulos and L. Zhang, "Heuristics for fiber installation in optical network optimization," in Proc. IEEE GLOBECOM, Washington, DC, Nov. 26-30, 2007, pp. 2342-2347.
6
7
 
8
 
9
 
10
 
11
D. Banerjee and B. Mukherjee, "A practical approach for routing and wavelength assignment in large wavelength-routed optical networks," IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 903-908, Jun. 1996.
 
12
13
 
14
 
15
P. Fishburn, Interval Orders and Interval Graphs. New York: Wiley, 1985.
 
16
 
17
 
18
C. Nomikos, A. Pagourtzis, and S. Zachos, "Minimizing request blocking in all-optical rings," in Proc. IEEE INFOCOM'03, San Francisco, CA, Mar. 30-Apr. 3, 2003.
 
19
P. J. Wan and L. Liu, "Maximal throughput wavelength-routed optical networks," DIMACS Ser. Discrete Math. Theor. Comput. Sci., vol. 46, pp. 15-26, 1998.
 
20
 
21
 
22
 
23
 
24
 
25
 
26
 
27
C. Chekuri, M. Mydlarz, and F. B. Shepherd, "Multicommodity demand flow in a tree," in Proc. 30th ICALP, Eindhoven, The Netherlands, Jun. 30-Jul. 4, 2003, pp. 410-425.
 
28
T. Erlebach, A. Pagourtzis, K. Potika, and S. Stefanakos, "Resource allocation problems in multifiber WDM tree networks," in Proc. 29th Int. Workshop Graph Theor. Concepts in Comput. Sci., Elspect, The Netherlands, Jun. 19-21, 2003, pp. 218-229.
 
29
B. Shepherd and A. Vetta, "Lighting fibers in a dark network," IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., vol. 22, no. 9, pp. 1583-1588, Nov. 2004.
 
30
 
31
X. Jia, D. Du, X. Hu, H. Huang, and D. Li, "Placement of wavelength converters for minimal wavelength usage in WDM networks," in Proc. IEEE INFOCOM'02, New York, Jun. 23-27, 2002, pp. 1425-1431.
 
32
S. Fortune, W. Sweldens, and L. Zhang, "Line system design for DWDM networks," in Proc. 11th Int. Telecommun. Netw. Strategy Planning Symp. (Networks), Vienna, Austria, 2004.
 
33
E. Anshelevich and L. Zhang, "Path decomposition under a new cost metric," in Proc. 12th Annu. ESA, Bergen, Norway, Sep. 14-17, 2004, pp. 28-39.
 
34
A. Koster and A. Zymolka, "Minimum converter wavelength assignment in all-optical networks," Konrad-Zuse-Zentrum fur Informationstechnik Berlin, Berlin-Dahlem, Germany, Tech. Rep. ZIB-Report 03-45, 2003.
 
35
 
36
 
37
 
38
V. Guruswami and K. Talwar, "Hardness of low congestion routing in undirected graphs," Elec. Colloq. Comput. Complexity, vol. 13, 2006.
 
39
 
40
 
41
42
43
 
44
M. Garey, D. Johnson, G. Miller, and C. Papadimitriou, "The complexity of coloring circular arcs and chords," SIAM J. Algorithms Discrete Math., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 216-227, 1980.
 
45

Collaborative Colleagues:
Matthew Andrews: colleagues
Lisa Zhang: colleagues