ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Multiple routing configurations for fast IP network recovery
Full text PdfPdf (739 KB)
Source IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking (TON) archive
Volume 17 ,  Issue 2  (April 2009) table of contents
Pages 473-486  
Year of Publication: 2009
ISSN:1063-6692
Authors
Amund Kvalbein  Simula Research Laboratory, Lysaker, Norway
Audun Fosselie Hansen  Simula Research Laboratory, Lysaker, Norway
Tarik Čičic  Media Network Services, Norway and Department of Informatics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway and Simula Research Laboratory, Lysaker, Norway
Stein Gjessing  Simula Research Laboratory, Lysaker, Norway and University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
Olav Lysne  Simula Research Laboratory, Lysaker, Norway and University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
Publisher
IEEE Press  Piscataway, NJ, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 28,   Downloads (12 Months): 136,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: 10.1109/TNET.2008.926507

ABSTRACT

As the Internet takes an increasingly central role in our communications infrastructure, the slow convergence of routing protocols after a network failure becomes a growing problem. To assure fast recovery from link and node failures in IP networks, we present a new recovery scheme called Multiple Routing Configurations (MRC). Our proposed scheme guarantees recovery in all single failure scenarios, using a single mechanism to handle both link and node failures, and without knowing the root cause of the failure. MRC is strictly connectionless, and assumes only destination based hop-by-hop forwarding. MRC is based on keeping additional routing information in the routers, and allows packet forwarding to continue on an alternative output link immediately after the detection of a failure. It can be implemented with only minor changes to existing solutions. In this paper we present MRC, and analyze its performance with respect to scalability, backup path lengths, and load distribution after a failure. We also show how an estimate of the traffic demands in the network can be used to improve the distribution of the recovered traffic, and thus reduce the chances of congestion when MRC is used.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
2
 
3
4
 
5
6
 
7
A. Markopoulou, G. Iannaccone, S. Bhattacharyya, C.-N. Chuah, and C. Diot, "Characterization of failures in an IP backbone network," in Proc. IEEE INFOCOM, Mar. 2004, vol. 4, pp. 2307-2317.
 
8
 
9
S. Iyer, S. Bhattacharyya, N. Taft, and C. Diot, "An approach to alleviate link overload as observed on an IP backbone," in Proc. IEEE INFOCOM, Mar. 2003, pp. 406-416.
 
10
S. Rai, B. Mukherjee, and O. Deshpande, "IP resilience within an autonomous system: Current approaches, challenges, and future directions," IEEE Commun. Mag., vol. 43, no. 10, pp. 142-149, Oct. 2005.
 
11
S. Bryant, M. Shand, and S. Previdi, "IP fast reroute using not-via addresses," Internet Draft (work in progress), draft-ietf-rtgwg-ipfrrnotvia-addresses-01, Jun. 2007.
 
12
P. Francois, M. Shand, and O. Bonaventure, "Disruption free topology reconfiguration in OSPF networks," in Proc. IEEE INFOCOM, Anchorage, AK, May 2007, pp. 89-97.
 
13
 
14
P. Psenak, S. Mirtorabi, A. Roy, L. Nguen, and P. Pillay-Esnault, "MTOSPF: Multi Topology (MT) routing in OSPF," IETF Internet Draft (work in progress), draft-ietf-ospf-mt-07.txt, Nov. 2006.
 
15
T. Przygienda, N. Shen, and N. Sheth, "M-ISIS: Multi Topology (MT) routing in IS-IS," Internet Draft (work in progress), draft-ietf-isis-wg-multi-topology-11.txt, Oct. 2005.
 
16
M. Menth and R. Martin, "Network resilience through multitopology routing," in Proc. 5th Int. Workshop on Design of Reliable Communication Networks (DRCN), Oct. 2005, pp. 271-277.
 
17
 
18
B. M. Waxman, "Routing of multipoint connections," IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., vol. 6, no. 9, pp. 1617-1622, Dec. 1988.
 
19
T. Bu and D. Towsley, "On distinguishing between internet power law topology generators," in Proc. IEEE INFOCOM, New York, Jun. 2002, pp. 638-647.
 
20
Rocketfuel Topology Mapping. [Online]. Available: http://www.cs. washington.edu
 
21
A. Atlas and A. Zinin, "Basic specification for IP fast-reroute: loop-free alternates," IETF Internet Draft (work in progress), draft-ietf-rtgwg-ipfrr-spec-base-06, Mar. 2007.
 
22
M. J. O'Mahony, "Results from the COST 239 project. Ultra-high capacity optical transmission networks," in Proc. 22nd European Conf. Optical Communication (ECOC'96), Sep. 1996, pp. 11-14.
 
23
B. Fortz and M. Thorup, "Internet traffic engineering by optimizing OSPF weights," in Proc. IEEE INFOCOM, 2000, pp. 519-528.
24
 
25
A. Kvalbein, T. Čičic, and S. Gjessing, "Post-failure routing performance with multiple routing configurations," in Proc. IEEE INFOCOM, May 2007, pp. 98-106.
 
26
P. Pan, G. Swallow, and A. Atlas, "Fast reroute extensions to RSVPTE for LSP tunnels," RFC 4090, May 2005.
 
27
 
28
P. Narvaez, K.-Y. Siu, and H.-Y. Tzeng, "Local restoration algorithms for link-state routing protocols," in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Computer Communications and Networks (ICCCN'99), Oct. 1999, pp. 352-357.
 
29
Z. Zhong, S. Nelakuditi, Y. Yu, S. Lee, J. Wang, and C.-N. Chuah, "Failure inferencing based fast rerouting for handling transient link and node failures," in Proc. IEEE INFOCOM, Mar. 2005, vol. 4, pp. 2859-2863.
 
30
M. Shand and S. Bryant, "IP fast reroute framework," IETF Internet Draft (work in progress), draft-ietf-rtgwg-ipfrr-framework-07, Jun. 2007.
 
31
R. Rabbat and K.-Y. Siu, "Restoration methods for traffic engineered networks for loop-free routing guarantees," in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Communications (ICC'01), Helsinki, Finland, Jun. 2001, vol. 5, pp. 1566-1570.
 
32
 
33
 
34
 
35
Y. Wang, Z. Wang, and L. Zhang, "Internet traffic engineering without full mesh overlaying," in Proc. IEEE INFOCOM, Apr. 2001, pp. 565-571.
 
36
 
37
A. Nucci, B. Schroeder, S. Bhattacharyya, N. Taft, and C. Diot, "IGP link weight assignment for transient link failures," in Proc. 18th Int. Teletraffic Congress, Berlin, Germany, Aug. 2003.
 
38
B. Fortz and M. Thorup, "Robust optimization of OSPF/IS-IS weights," in Proc. INOC, Oct. 2003, pp. 225-230.
 
39
A. Sridharan and R. Guerin, "Making IGP routing robust to link failures," in Proc. Networking, Waterloo, Canada, 2005.

Collaborative Colleagues:
Amund Kvalbein: colleagues
Audun Fosselie Hansen: colleagues
Tarik Čičic: colleagues
Stein Gjessing: colleagues
Olav Lysne: colleagues