| Analysis of micro-behavior and bounded rationality in double auction markets using co-evolutionary GP |
| Full text |
Pdf
(415 KB)
|
Source
|
ACM/SIGEVO Summit on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation
archive
Proceedings of the first ACM/SIGEVO Summit on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation
table of contents
Shanghai, China
POSTER SESSION: Poster sessions
table of contents
Pages: 807-810
Year of Publication: 2009
ISBN:978-1-60558-326-6
|
|
Authors
|
|
Shu-Heng Chen
|
National Chengchi University, Taipei, Taiwan Roc
|
|
Ren-Jie Zeng
|
National Chengchi University, Taipei, Taiwan Roc
|
|
Tina Yu
|
Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, NF, Canada
|
|
| Sponsors |
|
| Publisher |
|
| Bibliometrics |
Downloads (6 Weeks): 2, Downloads (12 Months): 18, Citation Count: 0
|
|
|
ABSTRACT
We investigate the dynamics of trader behaviors using a co-evolutionary genetic programming system to simulate a double-auction market. The objective of this study is two-fold. First, we seek to evaluate how, if any, the difference in trader rationality/intelligence influences trading behavior. Second, besides rationality, we also analyze how, if any, the co-evolution between two learnable traders impacts their trading behaviors. We have found that traders with different degrees of rationality may exhibit different behavior depending on the type of market they are in. When the market has a profit zone to explore, the more intelligent trader demonstrate more intelligent behaviors. Also, when the market has two learnable buyers, their co-evolution produced more profitable transactions than when there was only one learnable buyer in the market. We have analyzed the learnable traders' strategies and found their behavior are very similar to humans in decision making. We will conduct human subject experiments to validate these results in the near future.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
| |
1
|
W.B. Arthur. On designing economic agents that behave like human agents. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 3:1--22, 1993.
|
| |
2
|
S.-H. Chen and C.-C. Tai. Trading restrictions, price dynamics and allocative efficiency in double auction markets: an analysis based on agent-based modeling and simulations. Advances in Complex Systems, 6(3):283 -- 302, 2003.
|
| |
3
|
S.-H. Chen, R.-J. Zeng, and T. Yu. Co-evolving trading strategies to analyze bounded rationality in double auction markets. In R. Riolo, T. Soule and B. Worzel, editors, Genetic Programming: Theory and Practice VI, pages 195 -- 213. Springer, 2009.
|
| |
4
|
S.-H. Chen, R.-J. Zeng, and T. Yu. Bounded Rationality and Market Micro-Behaviors: Case Studies Based on Agent-Based Double Auction Markets submitted, 2009.
|
| |
5
|
|
| |
6
|
A. E. Roth and A. Ockenfels. Last-minute bidding and the rules for ending second-price auction: evidence from Ebay and Amazon auctions on the Internet. American Economic Review, 92:1093 -- 1103, 2002.
|
| |
7
|
H. A. Simon. Behavioral economics and bounded rationality. In H. A. Simon, editor, Models of Bounded Rationality, pages 267 -- 298. MIT Press, 1997.
|
| |
8
|
V. Smith. Experimental economics: induced value theory. American Economic Review, 66(2):274 -- 279, 1976.
|
|